Filmfreak
Sidekick
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2012
- Messages
- 4,597
- Reaction score
- 5,789
- Points
- 103
That argument could have a more solid foundation if we had already seen an attempt that feels like what you're describing. This is uncharted waters for Matrix. The only thing that we've seen where the Wachowskis weren't as active was The Animatrix and it was probably better than anything they came up after the original.Which, hey, I actually probably like more than the original movie even if it objectively isn't as good. So that's where we differ.
Whether it is a "brand" because of the sequels or not is kind of a moot point because they are a lot of things, many of them bad, but what they are not is assembly line corporate IP trash. They're idiosyncratic, personal movies about things the creators care deeply about. Resurrections in particular.
And while what you say has been true about other film series, there are also cases where taking the property from someone who has shown everything he could have and giving it to someone new made all the difference. There is not a shred of doubt in my mind that a Ridley Scott directed Blade Runner would never have been anywhere near as good as it was with someone like Villeneuve. And even if they didn't have best results for the most part I definitely think that it was a good idea for Lucas to walk away from Star Wars and for Spielberg to walk away from Indiana Jones. Also the Wachowskis are vastly overrated anyway. They are responsible for a couple of more really good projects, but probably 2/3 of their filmography is plain awful.
Hey I can very much see this being generic crappy film, I'm just saying I'm willing to give someone else a chance. Obviously if I had liked Resurrections as much as you did, or at all
