• Super Maintenance

    Xenforo Cloud upgraded our forum to XenForo version 2.3.4. This update has created styling issues to our current templates.

    Starting January 9th, site maintenance is ongoing until further notice, but please report any other issues you may experience so we can look into.

    We apologize for the inconvenience.

NFL - Game On

Man, I was giving the Jags and Titans a hard time for their pathetic offenses......9ers 3, Rams 0 with 2 minutes left in the half. Of course, these guys have an excuse and it's pouring rain, but the Rams O didn't look good before that either.
 
Man, I was giving the Jags and Titans a hard time for their pathetic offenses......9ers 3, Rams 0 with 2 minutes left in the half. Of course, these guys have an excuse and it's pouring rain, but the Rams O didn't look good before that either.
At least the Rams eventually won, 12-6.
 
At least the Rams eventually won, 12-6.
Yeah......and they outscored the Titans AND the Jags by 5 and 2 points respectively. The game also featured a combined total of 2 points more!! Only game this year without a TD. :funny:
 
Yeah......and they outscored the Titans AND the Jags by 5 and 2 points respectively. The game also featured a combined total of 2 points more!! Only game this year without a TD. :funny:
The MVPs of the game were definitely the kickers. :o
 
I was just checking out my new favorite website "Tankathon" LOL and I noticed something interesting. If the Raiders win even one game, they could fall from pick #1 to #8 because they have a more difficult schedule than any of the 3 win teams. The ONLY team with a more difficult schedule is the other 2 win team, the NY Giants.

FYI, the first tiebreaker is the strength of schedule. The team with the more difficult schedule is considered better and therefore gets the lower pick. You would think head to head on 2 teams who had identical records would be first, but I don't think that's the case in the draft.

The Jags is a BIG game. :funny:
 
I was just checking out my new favorite website "Tankathon" LOL and I noticed something interesting. If the Raiders win even one game, they could fall from pick #1 to #8 because they have a more difficult schedule than any of the 3 win teams. The ONLY team with a more difficult schedule is the other 2 win team, the NY Giants.

FYI, the first tiebreaker is the strength of schedule. The team with the more difficult schedule is considered better and therefore gets the lower pick. You would think head to head on 2 teams who had identical records would be first, but I don't think that's the case in the draft.

The Jags is a BIG game. :funny:
Just watch, the Giants will screw up their chances of getting a high pick by winning meaningless games
 
Just watch, the Giants will screw up their chances of getting a high pick by winning meaningless games
They have a pretty tough schedule.

Ravens
Falcons
Colts
Eagles

A couple of those games are winnable, but if I had to bet, I think I'd put money on the Giants getting pick 1. Even if they get pick 2, they'll get their QB. The problem for them is that if "they" win another game, they could drop to 8 also because teams 3-8 (3 win teams) all have easier schedules than they do.
 
Wow.....never saw that one coming.

Man, the niners are and absolute train wreck. I've always thought that Purdy was a serviceable QB. He'll do fine on a very good team, but isn't going to make an average team much better. To be fair, that can be said for probably 80% of the QBs out there.
 
Wow.....never saw that one coming.

Man, the niners are and absolute train wreck. I've always thought that Purdy was a serviceable QB. He'll do fine on a very good team, but isn't going to make an average team much better. To be fair, that can be said for probably 80% of the QBs out there.
And to think the 49ers were in the last Super Bowl, too. They lost to the Chiefs, but still.
 
I was just checking out my new favorite website "Tankathon" LOL and I noticed something interesting. If the Raiders win even one game, they could fall from pick #1 to #8 because they have a more difficult schedule than any of the 3 win teams. The ONLY team with a more difficult schedule is the other 2 win team, the NY Giants.

FYI, the first tiebreaker is the strength of schedule. The team with the more difficult schedule is considered better and therefore gets the lower pick. You would think head to head on 2 teams who had identical records would be first, but I don't think that's the case in the draft.

The Jags is a BIG game. :funny:

You just know the Raiders are going to end up winning a game. It almost feels inevitable.
 
You just know the Raiders are going to end up winning a game. It almost feels inevitable.
There's been many a season that I've been rooting for a tank and I can only think of one when you are wrong......Jamarcus Russelll. :funny:


The Falcons, Saints, and Chargers are all fighting for playoff berths or a leg up in the playoffs. While the Falcons and Saints are possibilities, they need wins badly. The Jags have the easiest schedule I can ever remember .(Jets, Raiders, Titans, Colts), but if they lose to the Raiders.......
 
Last edited:
There's been many a season that I've been rooting for a tank and I can only think of one when you are wrong......Jamarcus Russelll. :funny:


The Falcons, Saints, and Chargers are all fighting for playoff berths or a leg up in the playoffs. While the Falcons and Saints are possibilities, they need wins badly. The Jags have the easiest schedule I can ever remember .(Jets, Raiders, Titans, Colts), but if they lose to the Raiders.......

That's true. We can only hope to lose out. But as a Raiders fan, I expect to not get what I want lol!

Also, Shedeur throwing ball to Nabers in NYC. Sportscenter ran with that clip.

I won't be mad with either Sanders or Ward... but missing out on either of them in this draft will suck.
 
That's true. We can only hope to lose out. But as a Raiders fan, I expect to not get what I want lol!

Also, Shedeur throwing ball to Nabers in NYC. Sportscenter ran with that clip.

I won't be mad with either Sanders or Ward... but missing out on either of them in this draft will suck.
I think the Giants will take Cam no matter what (if he's on the board and they don't end up at 7 or 8 LOL). The fact that Sanders has said he'll sit out, will weigh on them. Plus you really don't want a guy on your team who doesn't want to be there (just ask SF :funny: ). IF Sanders were to walk away for a year, the Giants end up with nothing. It's not worth the chance; even if you think that chance is remote.
 
That's true. We can only hope to lose out. But as a Raiders fan, I expect to not get what I want lol!

Also, Shedeur throwing ball to Nabers in NYC. Sportscenter ran with that clip.

I won't be mad with either Sanders or Ward... but missing out on either of them in this draft will suck.
If the Raiders are going to win any of their remaining games, it's probably going to be against Jacksonville, since they're 3-10, I think.
 
If the Raiders are going to win any of their remaining games, it's probably going to be against Jacksonville, since they're 3-10, I think.
That's certainly the most likely scenario and, like I said, if they win that one game, they'll probably end up with the 7-8 pick. Big changes for one game. Let's go "Magic" Mac Jones!!! :funny:

I'm actually looking forward to going to the game with my self designed "Tank Bowl" T-Shirt. LOL
 
Last edited:
Man, the early games are pretty brutal. Looking forward to Pitt/Philly though.....Good thing I've got the ticket because they aren't showing it in SoCal. Bills/Lions will be interesting. I think the Bills are gonna be playing pissed after losing to the Rams....


Jets v Jags.....one of those 3-10 teams is gonna lose. LOL
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
201,242
Messages
21,928,248
Members
45,723
Latest member
ZyroZach
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"