Actually you did. And talking about the cap being raised just proved it even more because you're aknowledging there was a cap. BTW, devs can now request up to 450 megs but it involves a bit more then just asking and Microsoft saying ok, like you insinuated, sort of like how everything I linked showed that.
I acknowledged there was a "cap" in the other thread. I just said it wasn't a 100% full cap. It is more of a guideline for developers that can be exceeded as long as they get permission from MS. It's not like they could never exceed it, no matter what because MS has set it up as a rule.
Also, before you said that Castlevania was merely an exception to the rule, yet now you're acknowledging that the rule actually dictates that you can exceed said cap. It wasn't a set-in-stone rule that you
had to make a game 50 megs no matter what, like you seemed to be trying to tell me in that other thread.
And let's not forget that you started that arguement blindly claiming there was no 50 meg limit and that it didn't exist whatsoever until I proved it to you 3 times over.
I didn't say it didn't exist. It's just not important, since it can be exceeded. Thus it is not a true "hard cap." It's there as a guideline, not as the end-all, be-all like I was trying to say in the other thread.
You just can't help yourself.
I can't, really. You hit the nail on the head.
Actually I didn't compare the launch on the Wii to the PS3. All I said what Nintendo missed their 4 million target by 800k and no one cared because they aren't Sony, it's not like I was, say, makinga post talking about how Nintendo missed their shipments by an equal or greater amount realtive to Sony etc. Nice job on the reading comp.
The whole basis of the idea that no one cared because it wasn't Sony was not true though. It's because they still had a stellar launch nonetheless, and had little to no manufacturing and shipping problems unlike Sony. Hell, that's the only reason
I have singled-out Sony's launch. Well, and the poor launch titles but I guess the Xbox 360's wasn't too great either.
And your logic of you loving Nintendo not making you an Xbot doesn't work since they aren't entirely mutually exclusive. I love Nintendo, but yet you call me a Sony bot, so drop yet another flawed line of reasoning and you might be better off.
But being a Xbot requires for you to be in love with everything Xbox and some measure of hate for every other company, or at least this is the definition that I have gotten out of the name. See, I call you a "Sony wh***", which means you're in love with Sony. I don't call you a Sony "bot", which would imply that you eat, drink, and sleep everything Sony and don't see anything else as good enough.
I love Nintendo and Microsoft about the same, which means I'm not a Xbot. I may be a Xbox wh***, but I definitely do not have my head crammed so far up my ass that all I can see is MS and Xbox. Hell, I USED TO love Playstation (less so with Playstation 2) but just the crap that Sony's done in the last few years has disgusted me.
Actually your entire post history is what I based that remark on. Not any one comment, but you're right, Xbot might not be as appropreate as just Sony hater. I do expected you the launch into a diatrib of why you think Sony sucks, but you probably won't now that I just pointed out what you were going to do.
You're right there, I do hate Sony pretty much outright. And actually, I never was going to launch into a diatribe as to why Sony sucks. I never even thought about it. It's not like all I do is plot about how to next make Sony look like a bunch of idiots. They do it for themselves, really.
Hey you're welcome to your opinion. Just thought I'd make a fun post about Nintendo not meeting their goals. Nothing serious as the
, picard smiley, and the mention of 7.1 billion in the bank and then not having any spaces should have made apparent. Theirs nothing to raise your sheilds over here, but one comment sent you into full attack mode. Whatever.
See, I expect it out of you, though. That's the problem, every argument I've ever been in with you has given me the impression that you are willing to make
any company look bad as long as Sony looks better in the process. Coupled with the fact that I don't easily see sarcasm through the computer, seeing as I can't hear/see your voice or facial expressions.
Try reading the original post sometime, that wasn't why they didn't sell the 4 million. You keep toping yourself.
I'm sorry, I meant produced/shipped. If you would read the original post, there's a little part in there that clearly says they
SHIPPED and sold only 3.19 million consoles. Not that they shipped 4 million but only sold 3.19. You can't blame them for not being able to teleport Wiis straight to the retailers. It's plain economics.
