No, you don't.
Again, every movie and every project is its own entity. Even when you assemble the same cast and crew, different results happen. Look at Iron Man and Iron Man 2. Iron Man was awesome. 2? ...not so much. Did the fact that the first one was so good do anything to safeguard against the second's demise? No.
Like I said, I do agree, it would be difficult to do a JLA film - just as it was difficult to do an Avengers movie, but it's not about "not" being able to make GL or WW or Flash work in a solo film. It's merely about a JLA film taking precedence due to the potential financial upside.
And actually, financially speaking, I would think it would be much "safer" to introduce Flash and Wonder Woman in a JLA movie, have them be absolutely awesome in it, then through that win over people enough to actually be invigorated and excited about a solo movie featuring them.
Oh yes, I totally agree that it's a risk.Granted it's good. That's the thing to remember, by throwing all your eggs in one basket your risking all the characters future on film.
Oh yes, I totally agree that it's a risk.
At the same time, every time a superhero movie fails, it affects all of the other properties. If GL put up amazing numbers, do you really think Flash and WW would still be in production hell?
They're making a Lobo movie ?
Wonder Woman can potentially be the first successful superhero movie with a female lead. Men AND women love Wonder Woman equally, but they're making a Lobo movie...
I'm done.
Their reasons for not doing Wonder Woman are understandable. The reasons why it wouldn't be profitable make sense.
Warners screwing up Green Lantern and consequently burying Flash and all the others is unforgivable though.
On infinite earths a Lobo movie can not be more profitable than a Wonder Woman movie.
For every person that doesn't know Wonder Woman, there's five thousand that don't know or give a ***** about Lobo.
I guarantee it.
On infinite earths a Lobo movie can not be more profitable than a Wonder Woman movie.
For every person that doesn't know Wonder Woman, there's five thousand that don't know or give a ***** about Lobo.
I guarantee it.
Just the mere fact that they are even thinking about Lobo over more time-tested, A-List characters like Wonder Woman, just shows that they don't get it. Just the name "Wonder Woman" is woven into the fabric of our society. Even folks that don't read comics, know this name.
DC is just clueless. I love their characters. But they are in the wrong creative hands. Man..........
And with Avengers closing in on 1 BILLION dollars....they are panicking over there and they will make even more stupid decisions. Just watch.
On infinite earths a Lobo movie can not be more profitable than a Wonder Woman movie.
For every person that doesn't know Wonder Woman, there's five thousand that don't know or give a ***** about Lobo.
I guarantee it.
Maybe I am wrong but I think that WB can make a decent quality Wonder Woman for a budget of 150 million.
If the movie is good, It will make near 300 million worldwide.
Lobo is a space movie, for all the CG it will cost more money than sword and sandal.
Kick the Clash of Titans franchise out, give Carano an acting lesson or Arterton a fighting lesson, gear it as a semi chick flick -> Wonder Woman. Budget $110 million.