OK, i summised my points in this thread simply, so they could be understood easily, as a lot of people in their early teens are on this site.
Uh, so? What does that have to do with
your incompetence and shallow criticism?
If I need to explain how the editing was second rate at best to you, that is quite shocking.
Actually, you
can't and
don't know how to properly explain what was wrong with the editing in The Prestige. As you have proven time and again in our previous encounters, you can't reason your way out of a paper bag, let alone substantially elaborate on the problems with a particular film's editing. The day you learn to properly express your thoughts with precision and clarity will be the day your comments achieve any kind of merit or legitimacy.
As for my reading and comprehension skills, they are just fine, I flew through school with A's etc, yet decided that a forum website did not require my devout attention, considering I actually write to a degree for my profession, I doubt that this is a worthwhile avenue to pursue.
Please. I can't imagine anyone who has honestly graduated out of schools with high honors to be so careless and dumb in expressing himself, even if on a message board. That's one of the qualities of such people. All the countless hours of education get ingrained in the person's mind and character. Their proper language proficiency is not just an acquired skill, it becomes a habit. That is why in my very personal opinion, you 'flying through school with A's etc' is either bulls**t or you didn't attend schools with good enough standards.
How I make my posts condescending without verbal tone can only be contributed to my word usage.
D'uh. It took you this long to figure it out?
Hey, I'm using condescending words...maybe that is why my posts sound condescending! *Zing!*
Which, becuase I may analyse things differently to you and phrase it as such, does not necessarily mean I'm being arrogant.
Actually, difference of opinion has nothing to do with it. In fact, I'd have actually welcomed it if it weren't for the fact that you don't know how to make any sense.
A lot of people on here think BB is a great movie, then again these people(as I have often found is the case), have a low exposure to cinema as a whole. So by referring to other films etc, and using a comparative analysis(which is generally considered the easiest and most comprehensible way) to convey these thoughts would seem logical rather than anything else.
Comparative analysis is only valid when there is a relevant and rational basis for comparison between the constituents. Judging BB for not being the next groundbreaking achievement in filmmaking is not only illogical, but also ridiculously idiotic when the purpose of the movie is to provide some good summer escapist entertainment.
Secondly, my main beef with your posts was not the criticism of Batman Begins (quite the contrary, I myself admit to a good handful of the problems with the film that have been pointed out repeatedly before), but rather your pretentious 'examination' of the 'depth' and 'complexity' of B89 as well as your resoundingly hollow and worthless critique of other Nolan films like The Prestige and Memento.
If you could turn your attention to my actual points, rather than myself, we could possibly have a discussion?
Why do peanut-brains can't grasp the painfully simple notion that attacking an opinion and attacking the opinion holder are
not two mutually exclusive concepts? Your views and opinions reflect upon you and if your opinions are as mired in the gutter of self-importance, what does that tell me about you? Seriously, give it a thought.
Secondly, if you've been reading my posts, I
have given tremendous attention to your points. And the conclusions I drew thereof were exactly what I subsequently used to expose your own ineptness and failures. So please, don't play the blame game with me when the only one who is reluctant to address the
points raised thus far in this 'discussion' is you.
And that too because you and I both know you're not up to the task. Otherwise, instead of conjuring up pitiful excuses and vain attempts at self-defense since the last two posts, you would have actually written something of substance and value to the principle argument at hand.