terry78
My name is Stefan, sweet thang
- Joined
- Mar 8, 2004
- Messages
- 88,381
- Reaction score
- 8,384
- Points
- 203
Michael Oliver, who fired 31 times,
I wonder if these guys are going to come out of this clean. Since like 2 of the cops are black cops...also Sean was no saint either, plus why was he at a strip club to get some ass? When he was a girlfriend...
yeah, i doubt that the whole thing is racially motivated 3 of the cops were black, the other were white. from what i've heard of the story seems like the cops thought they had legitimate reason. 50 shots is the use of excessive force. and its not like thier lives were in immediate danger. did they even find agun in the car?
Wouldn't he have to reload??
Jesus H Christ, there wasn't even a gun! What the hell are these cops doing, firing so many bullets at a car that isn't even shooting back?
the cops both had two guns in each hand, with 2 more guns on their leg, and another under their hat
and what does the H stand for in Jesus H christ??
Course they didn't know that. If you were a cop and firing 30 shots at what you concieve to be a threat, so you can go home to your family, why would you hesitate?The news report says no gun was found.
Course they didn't know that. If you were a cop and firing 30 shots at what you concieve to be a threat, so you can go home to your family, why would you hesitate?
Course they didn't know that. If you were a cop and firing 30 shots at what you concieve to be a threat, so you can go home to your family, why would you hesitate?
1. It's a lot different being in a situation than looking at it in hindsight. You'd be surprised on what you'd do or what you percieve to be or not be a threat.There are a couple of things wrong with that, Erz.
Number 1: I'm pretty sure that you'd have to reload your gun to fire 31 shots. By the time it comes to reloading, a good trained cop should realise that there is no threat.
Number 2: Would YOU want cops walking the streests that have ****ed up so badly? They throw out doctors when they make bad mistakes resulting in death, so why not cops?
Number 3: They fired first. The cops fired first - at a threat that was non-existent. It's pure incompetence.
1. It's a lot different being in a situation than looking at it in hindsight. You'd be surprised on what you'd do or what you percieve to be or not be a threat.
2. For some of the cops involved, this was the first time they ever fired a gun on duty and not on a range. I think that shows it was the circumstance and not the incompetance of the cops. And don't compare apples and oranges.
3. So cops should only fire back when fired upon? How many dead cops would that leave?
While I feel for the family, police officers have the daunting task of having a split second to act. Many of the officers involved have never fired a shot on the job before that moment.
1 cop 31 shots
2 cop 11 shots
3 cop 4 shots
4 cop 3 shots
5 cop 1 shot