O.J. Simpson Confesses Hypothetically for $3.5 million

I don't think OJ did it, but I think he knows who killed Nicole and Ron.
 
GoldenAgeHero said:
any proof, besides your biased statement?
don't you think he's guilty?
It's just like Michael Jackson(who is guilty)
 
unstoppable said:
don't you think he's guilty?
It's just like Michael Jackson(who is guilty)

Actually it's been proven more than once that Michael Jackson didn't molest those children. DNA results, conflicting stories, and ulterior motives proved that Michael didn't molest those kids.

OJ, on the other hand, made himself look guilty by running from the police and talking about "suicide".

In the end you have one who didn't do it(Michael) and you have one who I think knows who did it.
 
LastSunrise1981 said:
Actually it's been proven more than once that Michael Jackson didn't molest those children. DNA results, conflicting stories, and ulterior motives proved that Michael didn't molest those kids.

OJ, on the other hand, made himself look guilty by running from the police and talking about "suicide".

In the end you have one who didn't do it(Michael) and you have one who I think knows who did it.
Can't you say that Jackson made himself look guilty by admitting to sleeping in the same bed as little boys?
 
0330chewbacca.jpg


Wilhelm-Scream said:
It Was being played FROM THE GEICO?!?!?!

LMAO

Indeed. :woot::up:
 
blind_fury said:
Um, hello? he was found innocent.

He wasn't found innocent, just not guilty.

They aren't the same.

The justice system cannot really find people innocent of any crime, just that there isn't enough evidence to find them guilty.
 
Tangled Web said:
Can't you say that Jackson made himself look guilty by admitting to sleeping in the same bed as little boys?

Possibly yes. But Michael didn't get into a white bronco, try to evade police, and talk about comitting suicide either. Michael admitting to sleeping in the same beds didn't do him any favors either, but as I said, conflicting reports, DNA results, strong witness stories, and ulterior motives proved Michael was and is innocent.

While we're on the subject of Michael Jackson. Apparently there is a recording of the first accusers father and his brother making plans to ruin Michael Jackson.

In the recording it said the father mentioned he plans to get "rich" off of this and wanted to get money from Michael Jackson. Take it for what you will.

But yes, I think Michael did make himself look a little guilty/naive for admitting to sleeping in the same beds with the kids. Either way what's done is done and I don't believe he did anything to those children.

And I doubt we're ever going to find out who really killed Nicole and Ron.
 
He must be doing it to finance the search for the real killer.
 
LastSunrise1981 said:
I don't think OJ did it, but I think he knows who killed Nicole and Ron.


Sure, he see's the killer every time he shaves
 
I don't think he did it, but I think he paid for it. :cmad:
 
I can still remember the trial and how the news was following it, I was young then but I was very much interested in seeing what was going on. I can still remember when they showed OJ trying on those gloves and showing how it did not fit him.
 
The only thing I remember about the OJ Case is that everyone when nuts(happy) when he was found not guilty. Of course I live in black neighborhood so it makes plenty of sense.
 
unstoppable said:
It's just like Michael Jackson(who is guilty)

All Michael Jackson is guilty of is being weird and naive. It's the media who want you to think he's some sick paedophile, when that simply isn't the case.

Michael Jackson is undoubtedly a very strange man, but in no way is he the sick predator the media have presented him as over the years. Given that he's never come any way near normality in his entire life, and has had so much adulation and wealth and yes-men since a young age, and is incredibly naive.....it makes sense he's so odd.

But as a placard at his trial was daubed, he's smooth, but he's not a criminal.

Let's not forget, Jackson was aquitted on ALL charges. He is guilty of absolutely nothing. And the trial lasted months. Everybody was against him. Everybody was looking at every minute detail, repeatedly. And there was nothing there.
 
blind_fury said:
Um, hello? he was found innocent.

No, he was found not guilty. There is a gigantic difference.
 
Kevin Roegele said:
All Michael Jackson is guilty of is being weird and naive. It's the media who want you to think he's some sick paedophile, when that simply isn't the case.

Michael Jackson is undoubtedly a very strange man, but in no way is he the sick predator the media have presented him as over the years. Given that he's never come any way near normality in his entire life, and has had so much adulation and wealth and yes-men since a young age, and is incredibly naive.....it makes sense he's so odd.

But as a placard at his trial was daubed, he's smooth, but he's not a criminal.

Let's not forget, Jackson was aquitted on ALL charges. He is guilty of absolutely nothing. And the trial lasted months. Everybody was against him. Everybody was looking at every minute detail, repeatedly. And there was nothing there.

I don't buy Jackson being entirely innocent. I don't think he did it with the particular child of whom he was accused of molesting and put on trial for.

I do think back in 1992 he did it. You don't pay someone 30 million dollars to shut up if you're innocent.
 
Matt said:
I don't buy Jackson being entirely innocent. I don't think he did it with the particular child of whom he was accused of molesting and put on trial for.

I do think back in 1992 he did it. You don't pay someone 30 million dollars to shut up if you're innocent
.

And as a loving parent you don't accept money either over your childs well-being.

Nice try.

The fact that the family accepted money over their child proves that Michael didn't do it. And it's already been documented, recorded, and stated that the father and the uncle planned a scam to get money from Jackson and created the story of molestation.

Bottom line Not Guilty and innocent are the same things really. When you're not guilty of a crime you're innocent in general. At least that is how I look at it.
 
That is very disturbing. I bet it'll be a bestseller:o
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"