MadVillainy
C'mon Son
- Joined
- Oct 29, 2008
- Messages
- 32,733
- Reaction score
- 9,402
- Points
- 103
What's with all the talk of Reynolds' career?
People are talking about Reynolds career because some saw GL as his chance at ultimate superstardom.
What's with all the talk of Reynolds' career?
Routh probably won't ever get a lead role in a movie because, from what I've heard, when he isn't playing Superman he's pretty wooden.
Will Smith, Johnny Depp, whatever. Seriously, ask everyone you know. Ask you're grandma if she knows who George Clooney is. Ask that weird Indian dude you work with. The only edge Smith and Depp is is kids, and that's because Clooney isn't willing to stoop to their level for mega-super-duper "I got a billion" BS stardom, which only makes him cooler than both of them put together.
Remember when Johnny Depp was an exciting actor? Thanks, Pirates. Can I have back the guy who did Dead Man and Donnie Brasco now?
Clooney's biggest grossing films ever (The Ocean's trilogy and The Perfect Storm) came *after* B&R. None of them made more than $200 mil, since someone asked, but each of those 4 grossed substantially more than the $107 mil that B&R did. Clooney's star power is associated more with his offscreen life than his actual b.o., though --- pretty much the same with Angelina Jolie, for instance. He's the kind of guy who makes for regular cover fare for everything from The Enquirer to Entertainment Weekly to Time Magazine.
Ryan Reynolds, by comparison, doesn't have that luxury. Yes, he probably will be unfairly blamed for GL's lack of success ("failure" is too strong a word at this point), and yes, it will probably be a temporary setback in his career. I don't think it's going to end his career at all, though....I don't think *any* CBM, no matter how abysmal, has ended anyone's career.
Clooney can do everything? any proof?
thanks
His filmography as producer and director is a good enough proof, IMHO. And he can even rejects roles like the Lone Ranger in a Bruckheimer movie.
i am talking about the budget.The three Ocean's movies. And whether or not his movies make 200 million dollars doesn't have anything to do with him being able to do whatever he wants. Especially when what you want to do doesn't cost 200 million dollars.
i am talking about the budget.
was Clooney in a 200 million movie ?
People are talking about Reynolds career because some saw GL as his chance at ultimate superstardom.
Reynolds will be fine. Besides the comedy he's doing later on this year, he's doing a thriller with Denzel that comes out next year. And if Deadpool ever gets off the ground, that's another plus to his career if it's successful.
About Deadpool, the executives might reconsider Reynolds for the role after what happened with GL. I don't say it's a good thing, because as most of you have presented it, he's one of the good points of the movie (yeah still haven't seen it, comes out in August, a week before Captain America), but you never know...Fox is making itt:
Routh probably won't ever get a lead role in a movie because, from what I've heard, when he isn't playing Superman he's pretty wooden.
No, but Brandon Routh was in a 200 million $ movie. Does that make him a bigger star than Clooney?i am talking about the budget.
was Clooney in a 200 million movie ?
Anyone think Ryan's star power was an encumbrance to this film? Not for one moment did I actually get lost in the illusion that I thought "that's Hal Jordan". I consciously knew it was Ryan Reynolds at every frame.
I guess the difference is that both of those are magnificent performances; Reynolds' not so much.That's the way I felt about Nicholson as The Joker too...and for me, it took away from it. For that matter, one could say the same about RDJ as Stark/IM...but for many, that's one of the biggest things that made the movie as enjoyable as it was.
i am talking about the budget.
was Clooney in a 200 million movie ?
This talk of Ryan Reynold's career being over is complete nonsense. I don't know a single person that doesn't know who Ryan Reynolds is, nor one who dislikes him. He's constantly talked about in magazines, Access Hollywood-type shows, and all that junk. It's not like execs will assume he's box office poison because he was in a bad movie. ****, he was in a TON of bad movies but WB definitely wanted him to an extent (obviously acting ability is a big factor as well) for the marquee value as he was popping up on all these "SEXIEST MAN ALIVE" lists, usually at number one.
Ryan Reynolds will be just fine, I'd be more upset for him about losing the ability to get with Scarlett Johannson.