Official Green Lantern News & Discussion Thread - Part 5

Status
Not open for further replies.
Allow me to explain.

Those tidbits were provided to me by someone who prefers not to be named, but said that there's no problem in sharing them with others, which I did. From my understanding, none of this was in the 2009 Script, and I don't know if it is in the toyline or not.

As for "flooding the chat", it basically refers to the Daily Blam chat. I went there to share some info that was posted were by an user - I forget his name - and later proved to be true by the WonderCon footage and other sources. The guys over there kept claiming that it was old news - which, as far as I'm concerned, weren't - and, as I have discovered, some people over there can get pretty aggresive when it comes to this kind of thing. So much that I never went to the place again.

It's that old deal: I trust the guy who told me this, and people can believe in it if they want to or not. I just want to say that several parts of it - like [BLACKOUT]the Guardians living in towers[/BLACKOUT] were passed to me before the WonderCon footage debuted, and it confirmed several of these details.

Sorry for the lenghty post. It's a pet peeve of mine hating to be called a liar. :yay:

Nice try. Sinestro's weapons WERE mentioned in the toy line.
As for the blam, there's 2 things.
1. you CONSTANTLY kept reposting the same things that had been around since November, i.e. items leaked from the first draft of the script. i specifically remember you saying that U-CAV pilots beat up Hal, even tho U-CAV's are automated.we were aggressive because you wouldn't listen. AT ALL. If all these details were leaked to you, how come you only admit it AFTER the footage has debuted? or AFTER we've seen it in TV spots already? you sir, are full of nonsense. you might not like being called a Liar, but if you throw **** at the fan, expect to get splashed right back.
 
I know that it's not to suppose to be talked about around this place, but really, I couldn't think of any other way to mention it without making it obvious (at the time). Saying it the way that I said it was the only solution that I was able to come up with.

and now (based on the post above) you've helped create some kind of forum warfare. thank you. :dry:
 
Nice try. Sinestro's weapons WERE mentioned in the toy line.
As for the blam, there's 2 things.
1. you CONSTANTLY kept reposting the same things that had been around since November, i.e. items leaked from the first draft of the script. i specifically remember you saying that U-CAV pilots beat up Hal, even tho U-CAV's are automated.we were aggressive because you wouldn't listen. AT ALL. If all these details were leaked to you, how come you only admit it AFTER the footage has debuted? or AFTER we've seen it in TV spots already? you sir, are full of nonsense. you might not like being called a Liar, but if you throw **** at the fan, expect to get splashed right back.
I don't know anything about the toyline. I don't think that's hard to understand.

As for what I shared with you guys, I only did so because it was news. The first draft of the Script has no pilots beating up Hal. By the way, U-CAVs are remote-controlled by pilots, smart guy. If you did not know that, I'm sorry.

And I wouldn't listen? I only shared because you guys said it was OK and it was news. It was you that kept saying that it was false and were then proved wrong. As for my timming, I don't really have to answer to you about that. I realized I hadn't shared the info before just today, looking over at old threads, and decided to do so. Don't want to believe it? Be my guest and see if I care. But you have no ground to accuse me of lying.
 
Nice try. Sinestro's weapons WERE mentioned in the toy line.
As for the blam, there's 2 things.
1. you CONSTANTLY kept reposting the same things that had been around since November, i.e. items leaked from the first draft of the script. i specifically remember you saying that U-CAV pilots beat up Hal, even tho U-CAV's are automated.we were aggressive because you wouldn't listen. AT ALL. If all these details were leaked to you, how come you only admit it AFTER the footage has debuted? or AFTER we've seen it in TV spots already? you sir, are full of nonsense. you might not like being called a Liar, but if you throw **** at the fan, expect to get splashed right back.

I don't know anything about the toyline. I don't think that's hard to understand.

As for what I shared with you guys, I only did so because it was news. The first draft of the Script has no pilots beating up Hal. By the way, U-CAVs are remote-controlled by pilots, smart guy. If you did not know that, I'm sorry.

And I wouldn't listen? I only shared because you guys said it was OK and it was news. It was you that kept saying that it was false and were then proved wrong. As for my timming, I don't really have to answer to you about that. I realized I hadn't shared the info before just today, looking over at old threads, and decided to do so. Don't want to believe it? Be my guest and see if I care. But you have no ground to accuse me of lying.

Cool it down a bit, guys. Don't want any flame wars getting started.
 
Last edited:
I can't really see how the Guardians of the Universe would be okay with living in those towers that we see in one screen cap.
 
Maybe it's just where they reside during the day? Or since they're aliens, they have unusual sleeping habits.
 
It's probably the movie's version of the Hall of Reunions where the Guardians often meet with the Green Lantern Corps in the comics.
 
I hope that they don't drag their robes if the entrances and exits are at the top of their buildings. Unless those buildings that are in the same screen cap that they are in aren't the buildings that they reside in.
 
Last edited:
I don't know anything about the toyline. I don't think that's hard to understand.

As for what I shared with you guys, I only did so because it was news. The first draft of the Script has no pilots beating up Hal. By the way, U-CAVs are remote-controlled by pilots, smart guy. If you did not know that, I'm sorry.

And I wouldn't listen? I only shared because you guys said it was OK and it was news. It was you that kept saying that it was false and were then proved wrong. As for my timming, I don't really have to answer to you about that. I realized I hadn't shared the info before just today, looking over at old threads, and decided to do so. Don't want to believe it? Be my guest and see if I care. But you have no ground to accuse me of lying.

You might not know anything, but oddly enough, you're mystical revalations about the movie have all been seen before. You're little Charade is falling through.And how is it news if at the time it was 3 months old? besides, we'd all covered it already the moment it came out. We're good at things like that. LOL Keyword being "remotely controlled". If pilots would actually beat someone up because that person crashed some planes THEY CONTROLLED FROM A JOYSTICK, then that really would be something. It doesn't make sense. We were NOT proved wrong. Show me. Prove it. all you said was basically stuff pulled from the first script and then later revised with footage already shown. Don't try to pass yourself off as some sort of insider with exclusives, because you clearly are NOT. have a good day.
 
You might not know anything, but oddly enough, you're mystical revalations about the movie have all been seen before. You're little Charade is falling through.And how is it news if at the time it was 3 months old? besides, we'd all covered it already the moment it came out. We're good at things like that. LOL Keyword being "remotely controlled". If pilots would actually beat someone up because that person crashed some planes THEY CONTROLLED FROM A JOYSTICK, then that really would be something. It doesn't make sense. We were NOT proved wrong. Show me. Prove it. all you said was basically stuff pulled from the first script and then later revised with footage already shown. Don't try to pass yourself off as some sort of insider with exclusives, because you clearly are NOT. have a good day.

Are my eyes deceiving me? I'm pretty sure I said for this discussion to be cooled down...
 
Last edited:
Are my eyes deceiving me? I'm pretty sure I said for this discussion to be cooled down...

That's why I banned him. When someone signs up here just to continue an argument from another site...well, we have no need for childishness like that.
 
It's probably the movie's version of the Hall of Reunions where the Guardians often meet with the Green Lantern Corps in the comics.

I am thinking the same thing here. It looks like it resembles it enough to be that. They probably hang out on top of the towers as the Lanterns come to talk with them. Sinestro is looking up in one of the tv spots at one point, seemingly talking to the Guardians, which may show signs of this theory.
 
In any case, a lot of the stuff that protocida has mentioned was not known by everyone and is appreciated.
 
In any case, a lot of the stuff that protocida has mentioned was not known by everyone and is appreciated.

Yea some of that stuff I didn't know about, so thanks Protocida !
 
I remember NoPurposeNaji from the Daily Blam. I guess he writes articles there or something. It's too bad that nobody warned him that he would get banned if he continued an argument from another site beforehand. Then again, hind-site is 20/20.
 
Last edited:
MatSDCC11GLBarbie3.jpg
 
I got a question, are the times that triggered the power rings to go into a dissolution and a near extinguishment state cannon? Because of the Corps voting for Sinestro to get the death penalty.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"