Bannerless Hulk
Civilian
- Joined
- Feb 2, 2007
- Messages
- 772
- Reaction score
- 1
- Points
- 11
Glad we're all good.
Yeah I know what you mean regarding the poster. I like your idea for bringing in the other case members. You could maybe replace the city/chaos scene behind them with faded images of the other actors all around.
For the posters coming up, It would be cool to see some classic Hulk poses of him smashing things up. Maybe have one with him against the army, then maybe one with him against Abom. You could even have a romantic that shows Banner and Betty with the Hulk between them.
just some ideas...
Yeah, I like some of your ideas too. Classic Hulk poses... can't go wrong with those. The view of his back, while impressive, just doesn't do a whole lot for me. I mean, this is the Hulk we're talking about, isn't it? The strongest one there is? Showing us his back doesn't shout "strongest one there is." At least not to me. And him facing forward really is no better. I want to be in awe...
What's wrong with expressing your views? I think the fact that people have been negative towards a majority of Hulk related issues. I think it could've been a knee jerk reaction. Using the term Nazi-ish is a bit excessive and not very PC. No one is forcing you to accept views, but challenging it which is normal here. Stick to your guns as we all do, BH means no harm and is as passionate a Hulk fan as I've ever seen. There is just too much drama on these boards. Peace dude.
Thanks for stepping in as always, EB. Have to say, love being compared to Hitler.

When I read Bannerless Hulk's initial post, I too thought he might be joking or simply being passive aggressive or confrontational over someone simply complimenting zerohour films' version of the original poster..because honestly, I didn't see the "provocative" elements that BH did.
The only thing I did was say was that I liked ZF's version a bit better. I didn't say it was better. I said I personally LIKED it a bit better. ..and that should have been sufficient. No one is obligated to explain their preference. But beyond that, I DID explain it anyway. And I thought I was pretty clear as to why. No need to be any more verbal about it than I was. If you would have asked me, I might have gladly expounded on it further, although I felt what I had offered was clearly sufficient.
BH may not have been directly addressing me when he made his statements, but it seemed as though he was beacuse I was the only one that expressed a preference for ZF's version. But as I said, I expressed support of my opinon originally, which is why I was rather confused by his BH's confrontation. If what he expressed about supporting people's opinions is really how he feels, then to be fair, he should have dressed down everyone who posted "I like it" in response to the original poster, because the number of post with that limited sentiment are legion compared to otherwise. Look back through the thread and you will see. I think that demanding people MUST give clear, and excessive support of simply a preference on movie poster is a little Nazi-ish. The Mods are the ones that make the rules here.
I want to throw in that I never said I disliked the original poster, I simply said that I PREFERRED Zero's version. And I do have to express that I am also impressed with his objectivity, fair attitude and level head in that face of someone making implications about his version of the artwork.
Okay, here is what I have to say about this: I'm sorry and I was wrong for demanding "clear and excessive support" of your preference for the poster. You're right in that you don't owe anyone anything, but did you "explain it away," as you claim? No, I don't think you did. That is, I don't see how zerohour films' version of the poster "gives more of a feeling that Banner can't escape Hulk than their backs facing did," as you say. To this very moment, you've yet to offer any real defense of your view... but no, you're not obliged to give any more explanation than you want to and no, I'm not going to formally petition you to "expound on it further" either. Silly me, I just thought you would want to "expound on it further," seeing that someone raised the gauntlet. How that translates as "Nazi-ish" is beyond me, but if you must know... yes, I am Hitler. I am responsible for Nazi Germany and the Third Reich, and one of my favorite tactics implemented was the forcing of people to defend their views. The cat's out of the bag. Oh, and I never did die, but don't tell the Americans.

It's also been mentioned a couple of times that people thought I might've been joking about the first part of my post which set this all off. I guess, yeah, I was... in part. I thought about the photo of Betty and the Hulk's first encounter by the tree in the '03 Hulk movie and someone's comment to the effect that it's provocative. And I was essentially making the same connection with zerohour films' version of the poster... but it was wrong. I shouldn't have gone there.
Re: your last post, it is entirely NOT the case that I'm trying to stick some rule to people whose opinions differ my own. I just ask that if you're going to have a negative opinion - and to me, going against the poster we've been given in any way is more negative than positive - then you should have some good rationale for why you think the way you think. And no one should have to come calling for an explanation if they think your opinion sucks. You simply defend it or take the heat. Posturing this stubborn "I gave you enough and don't owe you anything else" bit doesn't get us anywhere.
All of that said, you got me, carbon dioxide. [hands go up] What is so great about ZF's version?