Agreed. Kinda like the directors who take on two big superhero franchises IMHO.ultimatefan said:I dunno, this kinda feels like Jackson is playing safe, going for the territory he´s familiar with.
You keep telling yourself that.Cyrusbales said:Erm...there wasn't actualy a great deal of directorial skill in LOTR, the films were acting, SFX and story based, not really directorially challenging or intriguing.
I SEE SPIDEY said:You keep telling yourself that.![]()
hunter rider said:Directing is about great shots but mostly it is about getting great performances and crafting great scenes ,knowing when to hold and when to move,how to let a scene breathe.where to edit and so on,PJ showed how to do this on a grand scale in the LOTR trilogy
hunter rider said:Directing is about great shots but mostly it is about getting great performances and crafting great scenes ,knowing when to hold and when to move,how to let a scene breathe.where to edit and so on,PJ showed how to do this on a grand scale in the LOTR trilogy
Cyrusbales said:Directing is about getting performances, but it's showing these performances, and it showing the story, PJ relied on the actors to convey it, not using fillmic terms etc. It's not just about the acting or story, directing is far more sophisticated than that! And PJ just does simple and plain things, with his 'style'.
hunter rider said:Directing is to put the story over combining the visual with the narrative,not everything has to have symbolism in it to be good and exciting direction
PJ put stunning visuals onscreen and coaxed and crafted great performaces out of his cast,i'll take that over a bunch of fancy fades and edits and some "this shot represents religious whatyamacallit" symbolism
Cyrusbales said:A lot of the stunning visuals, were effects, that the shots had to filmed around. He was filming so he could use effects, so he was being directed by the technical staff! Most directors could have done the same work with his budget. A lot would have done better too!
hunter rider said:You have a right to your view i guess but you are very wrong IMO
Cyrusbales said:His early work was more directorially skilled, even though it was very kitsch. King king , WHY??? LOTR, was good, but could have been so much better. He's an average director and is nothing special!
hunter rider said:Like i said you can have your opnion but like a lot of them i think your wrong![]()
Cyrusbales said:Well i like to think I have a keener insight into what directors do, so if you can stand to watch LOTR all through again, try to look out for any inventive use of any techniques or anything out of the ordinary. Just a thought...
hunter rider said:LOL sure...
hunter rider said:
Looks...so....soft
Erzengel said:So this would have been my fate, if I never realized Star Wars is just a movie and what a girl felt like.