gregtestagent
humblevaudvillianveteran
- Joined
- Jul 19, 2004
- Messages
- 4,719
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
The movie sounds like bull****. Why doesn't he just direct Halo?
Xenforo Cloud upgraded our forum to XenForo version 2.3.4. This update has created styling issues to our current templates.
Starting January 9th, site maintenance is ongoing until further notice, but please report any other issues you may experience so we can look into.
We apologize for the inconvenience.
Cyrusbales said:He filmed around making effects, this restricted his creativity. He used very plain filmic language, no interesting shots, the image was quite oftne plain, he didn't shoot it badly, he just shot it. It was boring from a directorial point of veiw, yes he put in effort, but everyone did on the movie, it was a multi million blockbuster, so of course other people were involved and they all worked hard! And as it's nearly 2am, I shall resume this discussion another time, good night and good luck.
Cyrusbales said:Different filmmakers use varying degrees of actors and general shots and landscapes and narrative devices. 2001 is very special, but other directors use large amounts of non-acting narrative devices.
There were actors in 2001, but they barely had to do anything, they did what they had to do well, but still, they were not the integral part, so to speak.
And Kubrik showed that you can have a heavily acting based film, and be innovative with shots and filming techniques, ie: BArry Lyndon(his best work!)
Cyrusbales said:He filmed around making effects, this restricted his creativity. He used very plain filmic language, no interesting shots, the image was quite oftne plain, he didn't shoot it badly, he just shot it. It was boring from a directorial point of veiw, yes he put in effort, but everyone did on the movie, it was a multi million blockbuster, so of course other people were involved and they all worked hard! And as it's nearly 2am, I shall resume this discussion another time, good night and good luck.
Maximum_Carnage said:I totally agree. Me, & a friend had the same discussion about braveheart. The land of Ireland is so beautiful that really all you need to do is just set a camera down, & shoot it. This gives the illusion that it was well directed. Same with LOTR. New Zealand is a beautiful place, thefore the illusion.
The camera should tell the story as well, & it didn't in bother these cases. Never the less they were both still very beautiful looking movies.
swifty said:look!! when you're ready to direct a movie and surpass 11 Oscars then talk.
Peter Jackson said:"I can't wait to see Napoleonic battles fought with a squadron of dragons. That's what I go to the movies for."
gregtestagent said:The movie sounds like bull****. Why doesn't he just direct Halo?
I totally agree. Me, & a friend had the same discussion about braveheart. The land of Ireland is so beautiful that really all you need to do is just set a camera down, & shoot it. This gives the illusion that it was well directed. Same with LOTR. New Zealand is a beautiful place, thefore the illusion.
Peter Jackson to Adapt Temeraire
Source: The Hollywood Reporter September 12, 2006
Peter Jackson is eyeing his next fantasy series, optioning "Temeraire." The historical fantasy series ("His Majesty's Dragon," "Throne of Jade" and "Black Powder War") was written by Naomi Novik.
The "Temeraire" saga reimagines the world of the Napoleonic Wars with the addition of an air force of dragons and valiant aviators. It centers on British naval Capt. Will Laurence, who captures a French ship, where he discovers an unhatched dragon egg in the hold -- a gift from the Emperor of China intended for Napoleon. When the egg hatches, he is forced to give up his naval career to become captain of the dragon he names Temeraire.
" 'Temeraire' is a terrific meld of two genres that I particularly love -- fantasy and historical epic," Jackson said. "I can't wait to see Napoleonic battles fought with a squadron of dragons. That's what I go to the movies for."
Jackson also is looking to take the books into the realm of interactive entertainment.
Novik wrote the first "Temeraire" book in 2004. When Del Rey saw it, the publisher asked for two more books. The series was launched in the spring.
"As I was reading these books, I could see them coming to life in my mind's eye," Jackson said. "These are beautifully written novels, not only fresh, original and fast-paced, but full of wonderful characters with real heart."
Jackson has not yet decided whether he will make one movie or three or if the books can be introduced by other media first.
In that vein, Jackson has optioned Alice Sebold's The Lovely Bones and is writing the adaptation with partners Fran Walsh and Philippa Boyens on spec with the intent of speaking to distributors after the script is done. He plans to direct the movie in the second-half 2007.
Novik is writing the fourth installment of the series. Visit the books' official website for more info.
Most of Alfred Hitchcock and Stanley Kubrick movies were adaptations.
whats with the PJ hate?
im sure everyone has their dream movie they'd like him to direct...
but so does he and i can respect that. If he did a film about something he didnt like it would turn out like crap.