P.S. I'm don't mean to get into any kind of online battle flame war. I enjoy your posts, sir.
It's all good, man. All for the sake of discussion. Niether of us are being *****ebags here.
I don't go to malls looking to give dudes my information either. However, there are varying degrees of 'personal information'. My full name and my state are a matter of public record - hardly personal. Why have a name if you're not going to be known by it? But I agree - beyond that, I become hesitant to share any more.
Well, I'm known by my first name, so I tend to give that out more readily.
I just don't feel comfortable giving out anymore of my information. I'd rather know people a little better before giving out my deeper information, regardless of whether it's out there or not.
Indeed. But even if the world had access to your name and city of residence, there would not be an increase of people who mean you harm. It is arrogant, in my estimation, to assume that people have it out for you.
Not the increase of people, the increase of said peoples' capabilities and it makes their jobs easier. I most definitely don't think people are out for me personally, but if my information is
that readily available, and there are certain people out looking for
that information (whether it's mine or not), I'd rather mine not be in that mix.
Every time we leave our house, we take a chance. You take a bigger chance driving your car to work or school than you do posting your first and last name on the internet in a public forum. I cannot live in fear of extremely improbable catastrophes. If I did, I would just lie in bed all day.
I don't think I'd call it living in fear, just limiting the chances. Again, just because there are vast chances for us to get killed out there, doesn't mean it's a smart idea to add even more to the mix.
I don't like the terminology here. How is it 'exposing' someone to call them by their real name? And I don't think crime would increase with digital profiles that include a first and last name. Did violent crimes increase with the advent of the phone book?
It's not just violent crimes though (like I said in the last post), but again, just having the information readily out there makes it
that much easier to get a hold of. Doesn't necessarily mean that someone is going to be targeting you more often, just that the ability for those that may will increase.
I respect your right to privacy, and I understand your concern. Still, I think the positives outweigh the negatives. Internet usage in the next 100 years will be a natural extension of analog life - it's high time we start becoming a bit more transparent on the internet.
I agree in that it very well will be. However, I'm still not going to adhere to those standards should they arise, nor will my children (if I have them).
Imagine the possibilities of the internet in 100 years. We might be able to do any number of things... Send robots here or there, send physical objects to other places, etc. It would be much more advantageous to know who we're talking to instead of hiding our identities from one another. Then, since we know the identities of the online individuals, we could make a judgment on whether or not we should trust them.
This may not be viable right now... But will you not concede that that the death of internet anonymity is imminent and necessary?
I don't know that simply having their identities would make that easier. What if they have a criminal record? What if they circumvent the system and they're not who they really say they are? I do think that the death of its anonymity is imminent, but not necessary.
Either way, I'd much prefer to be the one knowing, than the one to be known.