World Rank these films

Superman
Superman Returns
Superman II: The Richard Donner Cut
Superman II
Superman IV
Superman III
Supergirl
 
Superman Returns
Superman
Superman II (Donner Cut)
Superman II
Superman III
Superman IV
Haven't seen Supergirl and thank god for that.
 
Superman the Movie
Superman 2
Superman 2 the Donner Cut (Just because it isnt complete)
Superman 3
Superman 4
Supergirl
Superman Retruns
 
I think the hate thrown at SR here is just borderline ridiculous. It's amazing how so many people turned on Singer the way they did.

It's one thing to dislike SR, but its another to continuously give it some really unwarranted hate. One would think that this was a "Batman and Robin" like disaster, when it clearly wasn't.
 
Superman--The Movie
Superman Returns
Superman II (both cuts)
Superman III
Superman IV

Haven't seen Supergirl and I don't plan to.

One would think that this was a "Batman and Robin" like disaster, when it clearly wasn't.

I agree. I also don't understand the "Singer is a hack" arguments. If they want to see a hack at work, all they have to do is watch Manos, The Hands of Fate and find out what a hack really is.
 
Superman the Movie- A masterpiece!
Superman II the Donner Cut- This film has hoppy editting but it's great.
Superman II (1980)- Stamp's Zod is good.
Superman Returns- This was the Lois Lane movie co-starring Singerman.
Superman III- Not sure if this movie belongs on the list since it was a Richard Pryor movie co-starring Superman.
Superman IV- The last time I saw this film was over 15 years ago.
 
1) Superman Returns: Despite having alot in common with the Superman 1978, I felt this film was alot less campy and cartoony. It was the first Superman anything that I could watch in the presense of normal people (non-superman fans) and it really made the character real as opposed to a caricature.

2) Superman The Movie 1978: Alot of cheesy and campy elements that pulled this one down from the top spot for me. Most noteably Otis and Kidder's awful 'Can you read my mind' was embarassing to watch. Didnt like how Reeve played Clark as slapstick.

3) Superman II Donner Cut: Better than the Lester cut but sadly it ended up being choppy in alot of places and the Lester scenes that we forced to be left in kinda hurt it. Donner could have made this film better than 1978 if he directed all of it back then.


4) Superman II Lester Cut: Generally it was a bad movie. The Donner scenes tended to get overshadowed by Lester's stupidity and the overall feel and intent of the movie, that Donner planned, was compromised.

.
.
.
.
.

5) Superman IV: Awful film. It was so cartoony that even the Fliesher toons were more watchable. I know Reeve had good intentions, but his idea just failed and this film killed his \S/ movie franchaise.

6) Supergirl: Alot of people at DC say the reason they killed Supergirl in the comics in 1986 was in response to this film.....nuff said.

7) Superman III: Worst of the worst. Ridiculous villians, ridiculous story. Richard Pryor was horrible. I can understand why Kidder wanted out of this one. This film probably caused the most damage from turning the passable \S/ frainchaise at the time into a complete joke.
 
Superman The movie
Superman 2 (Donner)
Superman Returns (this is close to the top two)
Superman 2 (lester)
Superman 4 (this had superman as the main star... not Gus)
Superman 3
Supergirl
 
The Eradicator said:
I think the hate thrown at SR here is just borderline ridiculous. It's amazing how so many people turned on Singer the way they did.

It's one thing to dislike SR, but its another to continuously give it some really unwarranted hate. One would think that this was a "Batman and Robin" like disaster, when it clearly wasn't.

Well said! :yay:
 
Oh yeah, by the way my rankings are as follows:

Superman: The Movie - A classic, which will never be beaten.
Superman II: The Donner Cut - Even better than Lester's version.
Superman II: The Lester Cut - Still a great, fun movie.
Superman Returns - A wonderful new adaptation for the 21st century.
Superman IV: The Quest For Peace - A disappointing end to the franchise, with poor effects and shoddy editing.
Superman III - Great scenes with Christopher Reeve placed into a Richard Pryor film.
Superman and the Mole-Men - Not as bad as I thought it would be.
Supergirl - Utter s**te, except for the one moment when they show Christopher Reeve's picture on Supergirl's wall.
 
The Eradicator said:
I think the hate thrown at SR here is just borderline ridiculous. It's amazing how so many people turned on Singer the way they did.

It's one thing to dislike SR, but its another to continuously give it some really unwarranted hate. One would think that this was a "Batman and Robin" like disaster, when it clearly wasn't.

I don't think it's any more ridiculous than the love thrown at it by those who rank it highly in this thread. People like different things. People obviously respond to differnt types of movies. It's like any other movie and it will garner a reaction. The vehemence of the detractors I think is driven more by the fact that people already feel they know the character and when SR delivered a Superman that they didn't recognize by his action we said, "Hey, that's not right."

If your exposure to Superman is mainly from the other films, the reaction might be different, but I think that long time comcs fans have a more extreme reaction to the film b/c we already know the character.

It seems clear that SR did not hit the mark for everyone.

Personally, the superficial aspects of SR were better than any other Superman film, but the substance was the worst.

In the end, substance will always hold more weight than style.

So, if you don't like the characterization, or story of SR, you will rank it lower on the poll than the other films. I think there are a lot of issues with actual filmmaking as well, the whole 'requel' idea is just stillborn. The vauge history concepts detracts and confused more than it adds.

If you are comparing it to Batman and Robin in terms of quality, then I think you are looking more at campiness than at the essence the characers. Sure the Batgirl in B&R was stupid, and the whole opening sequence was painful to watch, but the character still acted like Batman. Maybe if SR was not about SUperman it would have been better received, but b/c it's SUperman people have an idea of how he should act and fathering a child out of wedloc, being directly responsible for all the conflicts in the film is just not quality SUperman storytelling. The essence of his character does not revolve around cleaning up his mistakes, that's not what drives the character.

In this sense I think it is worse than Batman and Robin. As a film it may not be as cheesy or corny, but it fails to get the essence of Superman's character. I could watch B&R and get beyond the corniness for two hours, but I can't get beyond a Superman that acts as he does in SR, as Superman I could never respect as a nother man.
 
mego joe said:
Maybe if SR was not about SUperman it would have been better received, but b/c it's SUperman people have an idea of how he should act and fathering a child out of wedloc, being directly responsible for all the conflicts in the film is just not quality SUperman storytelling.

Clark/Superman isn't supposed to be religious is he? Why does he need to be married before having a child?
 
Kevin Roegele said:
Superman (1978)
Superman II (1980)
Superman II - The Richard Donner Cut (2006)
Superman III (1983)
Superman IV: The Quest for Peace (1987)
Superman Returns (2006)
Supergirl (1984)

I haven't watched donner's version of two.

so it goes like this...

Superman Returns
Superman 2
Superman
Superman 3 (purelly for the clark vs supes fight)
superman 4 (i really liked this as a child but watching some of it now makes me cringe)
supergirl
 
Superman: The Movie
Superman Returns
Superman II - The Richard Donner Cut
Superman II
Superman III
Supergirl
Superman IV


That is how I see it. Even though I love them all to tell the truth. Yes, Supergirl and Superman IV is bad movies but I still like them just for being the main character that is in the movie. I watched them all the time.
 
OzzMosiz said:
Clark/Superman isn't supposed to be religious is he? Why does he need to be married before having a child?

Any man who fathers a child should be committed to that child and the child's mother. Anything else is morally wrong and irresponsible.

The idea of marriage is not necessarily related to being religious in a Judeo-Chrisitan society. Ancient Romans and Greeks believed in marriage as well as part of strengthening society and providing solid base for raising children. Marriage serves as the foundation for the family unit in which the woman has the security of knowing the man is going to be there and the man knows that any children born are his. It also provides the children with the security of knowing who BOTH their parents are and that they will be cared for by both of them. Mariiage is a public and legal bond defining a committed exclusive relationship between a man and a woman.

Instead of saying wedlock for my particular argument, let's say instead that Superman has fathered a child outside a committed relationship. The problem is that he leaves w/o considering the possibility that his sexual relationship with Lois could result in pregnancy. He leaves w/o a goodbye. Does he sound committed to her or any child that may have been conceived during their relationship if he can leave town without even saying goodbye?

There is an obligation on the part of anyone involved in a sexual relationship to be prepared for the responsibility of conceiving a child. Your intent may not be to conceive a child, but that is what can happen and that is the biological reality of sexual reproduction. Therefore, if you are involved sexually with someone and not prepared for the possibility of children, then you should probably not be having sex. The innocent children conceived in these situations are victims of irresponsible parents, and too many of these children end up not being valued the way children deserve to be valued. These values are not necessarily based on any particular religion, but rather what is best for children. I don't think there are any societies or cultures out there that would say, "Yes, it's best to have children outside committed relationships, b/c (whatever....)."

Caring for your child is the greatest responsibility a parent can have. If you aren't around for the first 4 years of your child's life, then you have made a life altering mistake, both for yourself and that child.

I don't think Superman is the type of character to not understand this aspect of sexual and parental responsibility. That is why I think it is so out of character for him to leave Lois w/o saying goodbye after being involved in a sexual realtionship with her. He is not role modeling a behavior I would expect from him based on his characterization in every other medium. In fact it seems to go completely against character.
 
1. Movie
2. II (either cut)
3. Returns
4. III
5. Girl
6. Peace
 
S:TM
S:II the donner cut.
S.R.
S:II lester
S:III
S:IV
Supergirl.
 
Marriage before children is not just a religious thing. For hundreds of years it was a social-requisite. Society sets the standards and it actually had nothing to do with religion. The confusion is that religions still try to stress it as the ideal way to start a family. (Maybe it still is but that isnt nowadays, how society views it.)

EL


OzzMosiz said:
Clark/Superman isn't supposed to be religious is he? Why does he need to be married before having a child?
 
mego joe said:
Any man who fathers a child should be committed to that child and the child's mother. Anything else is morally wrong and irresponsible.

The idea of marriage is not necessarily related to being religious in a Judeo-Chrisitan society. Ancient Romans and Greeks believed in marriage as well as part of strengthening society and providing solid base for raising children. Marriage serves as the foundation for the family unit in which the woman has the security of knowing the man is going to be there and the man knows that any children born are his. It also provides the children with the security of knowing who BOTH their parents are and that they will be cared for by both of them. Mariiage is a public and legal bond defining a committed exclusive relationship between a man and a woman.

Instead of saying wedlock for my particular argument, let's say instead that Superman has fathered a child outside a committed relationship. The problem is that he leaves w/o considering the possibility that his sexual relationship with Lois could result in pregnancy. He leaves w/o a goodbye. Does he sound committed to her or any child that may have been conceived during their relationship if he can leave town without even saying goodbye?

There is an obligation on the part of anyone involved in a sexual relationship to be prepared for the responsibility of conceiving a child. Your intent may not be to conceive a child, but that is what can happen and that is the biological reality of sexual reproduction. Therefore, if you are involved sexually with someone and not prepared for the possibility of children, then you should probably not be having sex. The innocent children conceived in these situations are victims of irresponsible parents, and too many of these children end up not being valued the way children deserve to be valued. These values are not necessarily based on any particular religion, but rather what is best for children. I don't think there are any societies or cultures out there that would say, "Yes, it's best to have children outside committed relationships, b/c (whatever....)."

Caring for your child is the greatest responsibility a parent can have. If you aren't around for the first 4 years of your child's life, then you have made a life altering mistake, both for yourself and that child.

I don't think Superman is the type of character to not understand this aspect of sexual and parental responsibility. That is why I think it is so out of character for him to leave Lois w/o saying goodbye after being involved in a sexual realtionship with her. He is not role modeling a behavior I would expect from him based on his characterization in every other medium. In fact it seems to go completely against character.


Settle down, you might slip and fall out of your ivory tower.:yay:
 
The Eradicator said:
It's one thing to dislike SR, but its another to continuously give it some really unwarranted hate. One would think that this was a "Batman and Robin" like disaster, when it clearly wasn't.


It certainly is not nearly as bad as Batman and Robin, it's more like Batman Forever. It's all flash and no substance with some redeeming qualities.
 
Superman:The Movie (1978)
Superman II:The Donner Cut (2006)
Superman Returns (2006)
Superman II (1980)
Superman IV: The Quest For Peace (1987)
Superman III (1983)
Supergirl (1984)
 
1. Superman Returns
2. Superman The Movie
3. Superman 2

Haven't Seen:
-Superman 2 DC (But I would like to.)
-Superman 3
-Superman 4
-Supergirl
 
1. Returns (Eat me.)
2. The Movie
3. II
4. III
5. Supergirl
6. IV.

Haven't seen II Donner cut yet.
 
SUPERMAN IV: A QUEST FOR PEACE is unwatchable to me.

Richard Lester's Superman movies lose because they add powers to Superman like telepathy, saran wrap, teleportation, and way too much slap stick humor than ever needed.

Donner's Superman is great for it's time but I can't stand Ottis, and many of the scenes with Luthor.

Singer's Superman is brilliant, but not yet perfect. I think that in his next installments it will get closer to it, but for now- it is the finest outing.

SUPERGIRL is a film I will save my eyes from.

My list:

1.) SUPERMAN RETURNS (2006)
2.) SUPERMAN: THE MOVIE (1978)
3.) SUPERMAN II: THE RICHARD DONNER CUT (2006)
4.) SUPERMAN II (1980)
5.) SUPERMAN III (1983)
6.) SUPERMAN IV: A QUEST FOR PEACE (1987)


-R
 
1. Superman - aside from a few flaws and one horrible Kidder vocal performance, this is my benchmark
2. Superman Returns - took the franchise in a direction I liked and am looking forward to the next installment, I also enjoyed the storyline and the FX
3. Superman II: RDC - still has problems, but is a vast improvement over Lester's mess, even if I still don't think it's as perfect as it could be
4. Superman IV - I'm still the one crazy guy who thinks with the proper editing and FX overhaul this could be one of the best of the series
5. Superman II - Some of Lester's scenes were great, but for every well-laid one, there is an equally disappointing tour de suck
6. Superman III - Needs editing work and a pacing overhaul that eliminates any and all of the comedic bull**** that derails the mood
7. Supergirl - Needs editing work and an FX overhaul in key scenes as I still feel that this film is very much salvagable and has more potential than most will ever see
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,454
Messages
22,111,298
Members
45,905
Latest member
onyxcat
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"