Resistance: 40 person multiplayer, 2 match types revealed, offline co-op confirmed

Zenien said:
Resistance has done nothing but improve from the first footage shown; it wasn't CG. It had aliasing and a choppy framerate galore, there were missing animations etc... I think it looks better in motion then in stills. Actually it looks sort of bad in stills.

http://www.gametrailers.com/player.php?id=11193&type=mov&pl=game

Playsation conference is in like 3-7 days anyway. When is TGS?


SORT OF? IT LOOKS LIKE 'BLACK........AT BEST. :confused:
 
TGS is usually in September. I don't think Resistance will make an appearance there, though.
 
Indeed.

THWIP* said:
UM.......YES, I RENTED IT AS SOON AS IT BECAME BC WITH THE '360'. :rolleyes:

Hilarious, it doesn't stop you from being wrong.
 
Zenien said:
Indeed.



Hilarious, it doesn't stop you from being wrong.



NOTHING CAN STOP YOU FROM BEING WRONG, 'Z'; IT'S IN YOUR GENES. :o
 
WhatsHisFace said:
I hate when you guys argue.


WE WOULD NEVER HAVE TO, IF SHE WOULDN'T CONSTANTLY TRY TO DEFEND POINTLESS S**T. IF YOU CAN'T SEE THESE SCREENS ARE NO BETTER THAN 'BLACK', THEN THERE'S SOMETHING SERIOUSLY WRONG WITH YOU. THERE ARE GAMES THAT LOOK AWESOME ON THE 'PS3'..............'R:FOM' IS NOT ONE OF THEM. :o
 
It looks like Black at best? Stop saying stupid ****. I've played Black as well. While not as stupid as the guy who said that Heavenly Sword was almost as good looking as the new Tomb Raider Game, you do come second, so you sort of also win the complete idiot award.

Black would be what Resistance would look like if Resistance was made for last gen hardware. Resistance isn't the most amazing game graphically, but it sure looks better then Black, that's a fact, and non of your rose tinted glasses can change it.

Better yet, prove it.
 
Zenien said:
It looks like Black at best? Stop saying stupid ****. I've played Black as well. While not as stupid as the guy who said that Heavenly Sword was almost as good looking as the new Tomb Raider Game, you do come second, so you sort of also win the complete idiot award.

Black would be what Resistance would look like if Resistance was made for last gen hardware. Resistance isn't the most amazing game graphically, but it sure looks better then Black, that's a fact, and non of your rose tinted glasses can change it.


YES.......LIKE 'BLACK' AT BEST; IF ANYTHING, IT LOOKS WORSE, IF YOU CONSIDER THE HARDWARE DIFFERENTIAL.

ALSO, I THINK IT'S FAIR TO NOTE, THAT YOU WERE THE FIRST TO START A THREAD ABOUT 'BLACK', WHEN THE FIRST SCREENS FOR THE 'PS2' EMERGED. YOU WERE TOUTING IT'S AMAZING GRAPHICS, JUST LIKE YOU HAD FOR 'GT4' AND 'KILLZONE'. OH, HOW SOON WE FORGET. :down:o
 
Zenien said:
Better yet, prove it.



NO PROBLEM.....


04jz5.jpg



23bh9.jpg
 
Thanks for proving the point.

Yes I was and you'll notice it my anticipation for it died off well before the Xbox version was announced because I realized it was just going to be a pretty face at best.

and your second paragraph is pretty pointless, or hypocritical depending on your interpretation.

You're a joke THWIP I've never had the displeasure of knowing someone who is so dense and narrow minded and ignorant as you.
 
Zenien said:
Thanks for proving the point.

Yes I was and you'll notice it my anticipation for it died off well before the Xbox version was announced because I realized it was just going to be a pretty face at best.

and your second paragraph is pretty pointless, or hypocritical depending on your interpretation.

You're a joke THWIP I've never had the displeasure of knowing someone who is so dense and narrow minded and ignorant as you.


WHATEVER, 'Z'......ANYONE WITH ONE EYE, AND HALF A BRAIN CAN SEE THE ONLY MAJOR DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE 2 SCREENS, IS THE GENERIC ALIENS.

AND WE ALL KNOW THE REAL REASON YOU LOST INTEREST IN 'BLACK' : IT WAS NO LONGER A 'PS2' EXCLUSIVE. :rolleyes:

I CAN HONESTLY SAY YOU PUT MORE STOCK INTO YOUR OWN WARPED OPINIONS, THAN ANYONE I'VE EVER KNOWN. THE ONLY ONE HERE WHO WOULD AGREE WITH YOU ON THIS, IS 'THE LIZARD #1'........AND THAT'S NOT SAYING MUCH.
 
THWIP* said:
WHATEVER, 'Z'......ANYONE WITH ONE EYE, AND HALF A BRAIN CAN SEE THE ONLY MAJOR DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE 2 SCREENS, IS THE GENERIC ALIENS.

AND WE ALL KNOW THE REAL REASON YOU LOST INTEREST IN 'BLACK' : IT WAS NO LONGER A 'PS2' EXCLUSIVE. :rolleyes:

I CAN HONESTLY SAY YOU PUT MORE STOCK INTO YOUR OWN WARPED OPINIONS, THAN ANYONE I'VE EVER KNOWN. THE ONLY ONE HERE WHO WOULD AGREE WITH YOU ON THIS, IS 'THE LIZARD #1'........AND THAT'S NOT SAYING MUCH.

Dude don't drag me into you're guys bull ****, sorry I like this game THWIP are you going to hold that against me. Jesus Christ everyone is so F**KING stupid right now on these threads. We're arguing about games here! What the hell has the world come to? THWIP obviously you don't like Resistance Fall of Man thats great whatever, you think it looks like Black me and Zenien think it looks a lot better, screenshots always make a game look ugly and you can't justify this by screenshots. Get a video of Black and a video of Resistance there will be a huge F**KING diffrence.

Resistance has explosions and amazing particle effects that could never be grasped on the PS2 or the Xbox. There are a ton of people on screen if you count there is like 18 in one shot and 32 in another. The game will have amazing graphics and heres why.

You keep forgetting that what was demoed at E3 was not on final PS3 hardware. Plus it was only 70% done usually Insomniac goes over and polishes when the game is fully complete or maybe that 30% is the graphics that they are working on.

Also remember Halo for the original xbox the graphics looked horrible in one of the announcement trailers. The Spider-Man movie game looked a lot better. Halo had shields on the Elites arms and Master Chiefs sounded like a robocop rip off and that was like six months before the game released. Same applies for Resistace. What was demoed at E3 was just the tip of the ice berg Ted Price said, he plans on making huge graphical leaps with the remaining time they have. A good four months to go.

Halo is an excellent example because it sort of was horribly done with the voice acting and the enviornments didn't look that astonishing but then it came and bit us all in the assess when we all sort of doubted it and now it had the most amazing graphics.

Insomniac can pull this off because they have a ton of talent and their graphics for games are always really well done. Trust me they are not going to dissappoint, just look at their track record.

Also PSM said "Although it was a loss losing 60 Frames per second they said its well worth it because the graphics are superb now and it was a well done sacrifice. So stop whining if the graphics don't look up to your standards but you can't say that they are ugly. I mean personally these graphics are better than some graphics that are 360 games out on shelves.

Quake 4, Call of Duty 2.....ect.

FES voice: "So just wait until it hits store shelves, you egotistical son of a *****." :D
 
THE LIZARD#1 said:
Dude don't drag me into you're guys bull ****, sorry I like this game THWIP are you going to hold that against me. Jesus Christ everyone is so F**KING stupid right now on these threads. We're arguing about games here! What the hell has the world come to? THWIP obviously you don't like Resistance Fall of Man thats great whatever, you think it looks like Black me and Zenien think it looks a lot better, screenshots always make a game look ugly and you can't justify this by screenshots. Get a video of Black and a video of Resistance there will be a huge F**KING diffrence.

Resistance has explosions and amazing particle effects that could never be grasped on the PS2 or the Xbox. There are a ton of people on screen if you count there is like 18 in one shot and 32 in another. The game will have amazing graphics and heres why.

You keep forgetting that what was demoed at E3 was not on final PS3 hardware. Plus it was only 70% done usually Insomniac goes over and polishes when the game is fully complete or maybe that 30% is the graphics that they are working on.

Also remember Halo for the original xbox the graphics looked horrible in one of the announcement trailers. The Spider-Man movie game looked a lot better. Halo had shields on the Elites arms and Master Chiefs sounded like a robocop rip off and that was like six months before the game released. Same applies for Resistace. What was demoed at E3 was just the tip of the ice berg Ted Price said, he plans on making huge graphical leaps with the remaining time they have. A good four months to go.

Halo is an excellent example because it sort of was horribly done with the voice acting and the enviornments didn't look that astonishing but then it came and bit us all in the assess when we all sort of doubted it and now it had the most amazing graphics.

Insomniac can pull this off because they have a ton of talent and their graphics for games are always really well done. Trust me they are not going to dissappoint, just look at their track record.

Also PSM said "Although it was a loss losing 60 Frames per second they said its well worth it because the graphics are superb now and it was a well done sacrifice. So stop whining if the graphics don't look up to your standards but you can't say that they are ugly. I mean personally these graphics are better than some graphics that are 360 games out on shelves.

Quake 4, Call of Duty 2.....ect.

FES voice: "So just wait until it hits store shelves, you egotistical son of a *****." :D



IF YOU THINK THE FINISHED GAME WILL LOOK NOTICEABLY DIFFERENT FROM THESE SHOTS, YOU'RE IN FOR A MAJOR LETDOWN. :o THEY HAD TO SACRIFICE FRAME SPEED, JUST TO MAKE AN IMPROVEMENT........ON A CONSOLE THAT'S BOASTING "UP TO 120 FPS, AT 1080 RESOLUTION............AND 4D!". :down:rolleyes:
 
Hey Thwip I'd like you to take a reality check for me, lets see Call of Duty 2 doesn't look that impressive when compared to Resistance which is a launch title and so was Call of Duty. Now you look at a game like Gears of War and compare it to Call of Duty 2 and it guts it like a fish. Whats the diffrence you ask? Let's see Call of Duty 2 was a launch title and Gears of War is a second generation game, hhhmmm that makes a huge diffrence doesn't it?

Also Insomniac has been working on this game for only seven months and so far it looks really promising and has been getting great media attention.
 
THE LIZARD#1 said:
Hey Thwip I'd like you to take a reality check for me, lets see Call of Duty 2 doesn't look that impressive when compared to Resistance which is a launch title and so was Call of Duty. Now you look at a game like Gears of War and compare it to Call of Duty 2 and it guts it like a fish. Whats the diffrence you ask? Let's see Call of Duty 2 was a launch title and Gears of War is a second generation game, hhhmmm that makes a huge diffrence doesn't it?

Also Insomniac has been working on this game for only seven months and so far it looks really promising and has been getting great media attention.
Call of Duty 2 was also a PC port, and the game's max settings can run on PCs far less powerful than the 360.
 
THE LIZARD#1 said:
Hey Thwip I'd like you to take a reality check for me, lets see Call of Duty 2 doesn't look that impressive when compared to Resistance which is a launch title and so was Call of Duty. Now you look at a game like Gears of War and compare it to Call of Duty 2 and it guts it like a fish. Whats the diffrence you ask? Let's see Call of Duty 2 was a launch title and Gears of War is a second generation game, hhhmmm that makes a huge diffrence doesn't it?

Also Insomniac has been working on this game for only seven months and so far it looks really promising and has been getting great media attention.


1.) COD2 ISN'T A 'PS3' GAME; MY WHOLE POINT IS THIS GAME FAILS, COMPARED TO MOST OTHER 'PS3' GAMES........PARTICULARLY CONSIDERING ALL THE "HYPE".

2.) ACCORDING TO 'SONY', AND EVERY 'SONY' FANBOY/GIRL, THE 'PS3' IS A "SUPERCOMPUTER", CAPABLE OF MINDBLOWING GRAPHICS, LIKE WE'VE NEVER SEEN BEFORE. IF THAT'S THE CASE, EVEN LAUNCH TITLES SHOULD BE
BETTER THAN ALL '360' OR 'PC' GAMES, BY DEFAULT.

3.) IF YOU SERIOUSLY THINK THIS GAME HAS ONLY BEEN IN DEVELOPMENT FOR "7 MONTHS", YOU'RE KIDDING YOURSELF. IF THAT'S THE CASE, IT WOULDN'T BE A 'PS3' LAUNCH TITLE.

4.) 'GEARS OF WAR' "GUTTED" EVERY '360' AND 'PS3' GAME WE'VE SEEN, THE FIRST DAY SCREENS OF IT WERE SHOWN (AS UE3 TEST SHOTS)........2 YEARS AGO. IF YOU'RE TRYING TO MAKE A POINT, PLEASE......MAKE IT.

5.) "GREAT MEDIA ATTENTION" USUALLY = HYPE, FED BY LOTS OF $$$. 'SONY' EXPLOITS THE MEDIA BETTER/WORSE THAN ANYBODY ELSE.
 
The character models in Mass Effect are better than GOW:o
 
Mass Effect has great graphics, but I think Gears of War still tops it off.
 
mass-effect-20060512020812888.jpg

mass-effect-20060510040220784.jpg





You can make the main character look like whatever, right?
 
You can change your characters face to whatever you like, male or female, like Oblivion. Just with better graphics. :cool:
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"