Rev. Falwell decries stem cell research

The Overlord said:
Were you not paying attention, it has already been noted that many fetuses die from natural causes, like medical complications. Why can't we use those for medical research?
Because those are God's fetuses and he likes them untouched.
 
The Overlord said:
Were you not paying attention, it has already been noted that many fetuses die from natural causes, like medical complications. Why can't we use those for medical research?

It's about the intrinsic value of human life. If you start deciding that some humans will be used in medical research and others won't be, you are stating that some humans are more valuable than another.
 
War Lord said:
It's about the intrinsic value of human life. If you start deciding that some humans will be used in medical research and others won't be, you are stating that some humans are more valuable than another.

isn't there organ donation and the use of corpses for mdeical research already?
 
Mr Sparkle said:
isn't there organ donation and the use of corpses for mdeical research already?

I don't oppose organ donation or corpse research because they are done with the consent of the person. I'll rethink my position when we can get embryoes to sign consent forms.
 
War Lord said:
I don't oppose organ donation or corpse research because they are done with the consent of the person. I'll rethink my position when we can get embryoes to sign consent forms.

so you'd rather people go without cures, even though the fetus is dead? wouldn't this contradict your "sanctity of life "argument?
 
Mr Sparkle said:
so you'd rather people go without cures, even though the fetus is dead? wouldn't this contradict your "sanctity of life "argument?

No, because I wouldn't use sick people for medical research anyway. I'm all for curing everything under the sun, but I don't believe in experimenting on humans to do it.
 
War Lord said:
No, because I wouldn't use sick people for medical research anyway. I'm all for curing everything under the sun, but I don't believe in experimenting on humans to do it.

no....not sick...DEAD, the fetuses are already dead.
 
Mr Sparkle said:
no....not sick...DEAD, the fetuses are already dead.

So what?

It's the principle that humans shouldn't be experimented upon in any form.
 
War Lord said:
It's about the intrinsic value of human life. If you start deciding that some humans will be used in medical research and others won't be, you are stating that some humans are more valuable than another.

First of all if some fetuses die or are "aborted" by natural causes how would hurt anyone to use these cells in medical research? They fetus is already dead, so who is it hurting, except the 4 year old who is dying of terminal that could be cured by research, but is going to die instead so you can stick to your illogical principal. Bravo.

Also ultimately it doesn't matter, if you or I or anyone else here likes or dislikes abortion, its not going to become illegal anytime soon. Personally I think abortion is far too much of a messy subject, so frankly I have no real opinion on it. However I am a pratical individual, pratically speaking since abortions are happening anyway, whether you like or not, why not use cells from the festuses in medical research? They are going to get aborted either way, so what's the harm in using these aborted festuses' cells to promote medical research that could save the lives of many people in the future?
 
The Overlord said:
First of all if some fetuses die or are "aborted" by natural causes how would hurt anyone to use these cells in medical research? They fetus is already dead, so who is it hurting, except the 4 year old who is dying of terminal that could be cured by research, but is going to die instead so you can stick to your illogical principal. Bravo.

Also ultimately it doesn't matter, if you or I or anyone else here likes or dislikes abortion, its not going to become illegal anytime soon. Personally I think abortion is far too much of a messy subject, so frankly I have no real opinion on it. However I am a pratical individual, pratically speaking since abortions are happening anyway, whether you like or not, why not use cells from the festuses in medical research? They are going to get aborted either way, so what's the harm in using these aborted festuses' cells to promote medical research that could save the lives of many people in the future?

It's the principle. Either humans have an untouchable intrinsic value or we are just tools and to be used by the strong.
 
War Lord said:
So what?

It's the principle that humans shouldn't be experimented upon in any form.

No its like using body parts from a corpse to conducted medical research. If fetus is is already dead because of medical complications, it isn't alive in any sense of the word, it would be dead and since its not alive anymore we're not experimenting on ahuman being, at best we're exiperimenting on a clump of cells, at worst we're experimenting on a corpse.

Why is a dead fetus more important than curing a 4 year old with a terminal disease?
 
War Lord said:
So what?

It's the principle that humans shouldn't be experimented upon in any form.

:confused: DEAD humans have been experimented upon for ages, so there's no principle to it.
 
Mr Sparkle said:
:confused: DEAD humans have been experimented upon for ages, so there's no principle to it.

Doesn't make it right.
 
The Overlord said:
No its like using body parts from a corpse to conducted medical research. If fetus is is already dead because of medical complications, it isn't alive in any sense of the word, it would be dead and since its not alive anymore we're not experimenting on ahuman being, at best we're exiperimenting on a clump of cells, at worst we're experimenting on a corpse.

Why is a dead fetus more important than curing a 4 year old with a terminal disease?

You're defining some people as less valuable than others and that concerns me.

Dead or alive, it still has intrinsic value.
 
War Lord said:
It's the principle. Either humans have an untouchable intrinsic value or we are just tools and to be used by the strong.

Every rule has exceptions, rule without exceptions often become so rigid that they are rendered useless.

The fact is if a fetus is already dead, its already dead, you can't save it and its likely just going to be disposed of anyway. So if the experimenting on a dead fetuses cells could provided a cure to a 4 year old with terminal disease, how does it promote life to this child die by not experimenting on something that is already dead?
 
War Lord said:
Doesn't make it right.

and as soon as reverend falwell decries it, and somebody comes up with legislation against it, the whole stem cell research won't be just two faced hypocrisy.
how exactly do you suggest that med students get their knowledge of the human body if NOT from corpses?:confused:
 
War Lord said:
You're defining some people as less valuable than others and that concerns me.

Dead or alive, it still has intrinsic value.

Yes, I tend to put the well being of people who are alive, above those are dead, because their dead. Whether you believe in the after life or not, the body is merely an empyt shell, its not alive so it doesn't hurt anyone or destory the value of life to experiment on a corpse, because its not alive.

Why should we allow people to suffer and die to protect the "life value" of a corpse? That's completely illogical.
 
popcorn.gif


I have this strange way of justifying research on animals. I love animals, but I've also personally used them for research. I don't know why that's okay with me. (Note that I said, "okay" and not "fun." Killing animals is never any fun, even for scientists who've done it for years.) I guess it's because we're using their bodies for knowledge, to seek truth. There's something amazing about bodies and cells and what they're able to do. Like Native Americans who thanked the spirits of the animals they killed for food, I try to give respect and reverence for the lives sacrificed in our quest for knowledge.

I don't believe in the life value of a corpse. To me, the body is just a vessel for one's soul - the essence of a person. When one is dead, the soul is already gone and the body is of no use to that soul anymore. What makes people human isn't the physical stuff, but the stuff within, and that can't be quantified after death. I'm all for cremation. :)
 
War Lord said:
It's the principle. Either humans have an untouchable intrinsic value or we are just tools and to be used by the strong.

Well, now I have a better understanding why you'd be so against it.

:woot: :woot: :woot:

:)
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

  • C. Lee
    Superherohype Administrator

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
200,612
Messages
21,771,891
Members
45,610
Latest member
kimcity
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"