Reviews thread

Even though I'm still on the fence about this movie it does give me some hope that they compare Macht to Campbell.

The Spirit gets a phone call.

The Spirit: "I'm on my way."

There's a montage where he throws on his shirt and straightens his red tie. He puts his fedora on his head and puts on his trench coat.

The Spirit: "Groovy."
:woot:
 
It's official.

The Spirit movie sucks.

Roger Ebert's review is up

http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20081223/REVIEWS/812239987

Roger Ebert - "The movie is all style -- style without substance"

That is exactly what I thought Roger Ebert would say. He said the same thing about Blade Runner in 1982 (""Blade Runner" is a stunningly interesting visual achievement, but a failure as a story"), and Unforgiven in 1992 (he later said "I changed my mind on Unforgiven; I wasn't thinking very well when I reviewed that."), and Batman Returns. Three of my favorite movies. Roger Ebert's reviews often suck.
 
Last edited:
Roger Ebert - "The movie is all style -- style without substance"

That is exactly what I thought Roger Ebert would say. He said the same thing about Blade Runner in 1982, and Unforgiven in 1992, and Batman Returns. Three of my favorite movies. Roger Ebert's reviews often suck.

he reviews, or talks about, the Final Cut of Blade Runner and he speaks favorably about it. He also considers it a "great movie". Personally, i'm not too fond of the the voice-over version of the film either, though.

But i don't really like Ebert either. I read his review of "Quantom of Solace" and he basically *****ed about there being a lack of fancy gadgets, which is why he thought it wasn't any good.

But he loved Sin City, for some reason.
 
Roger Ebert - "The movie is all style -- style without substance"

That is exactly what I thought Roger Ebert would say. He said the same thing about Blade Runner in 1982 (""Blade Runner" is a stunningly interesting visual achievement, but a failure as a story"), and Unforgiven in 1992, and Batman Returns. Three of my favorite movies. Roger Ebert's reviews often suck.

I disagree with Unforgiven(though I can't find anywhere he said that) but he's absolutely right about Blade Runner and Batman Returns. I disagree with many of Roger Ebert's reviews but I still think he's one of the best critics in the business.
 
Here's another positive review: http://www.moviesonline.ca/movie_review_detail.php?id=12377

THE SPIRIT Movie Review
By: MovieFanatic

"Unlike the cliche superhero, Denny Colt discovers what it really means to be "human." Frank Miller's script is a morality play. "Everyman" is "The Spirit."
He learns that only in service of another human being, only by defending one's city, one's woman -- by connecting to something larger than self, by choosing morality over expediency --will the Golden Fleece be rightfully earned as life-saving armor.
And Gabriel Macht played that arc sensitively and strongly. His quiet vulnerability and quest opened Denny Colt to a true classic discovery of what it means to live."
 
Last edited:
he reviews, or talks about, the Final Cut of Blade Runner and he speaks favorably about it. He also considers it a "great movie".

Right, because he changed his mind on Blade Runner years later. In his original 1982 review he said ""Blade Runner" is a stunningly interesting visual achievement, but a failure as a story."
 
Right, because he changed his mind on Blade Runner years later. In his original 1982 review he said ""Blade Runner" is a stunningly interesting visual achievement, but a failure as a story."

I wouldn't say its a failure, but it sure isn't a success. Oh, and people are allowed to change their minds. Perspective does that. Maybe some day the perspective will change on The Spirit, who knows?
 
I like this quote from this review particularly: "The ads are quick to remind you Frank Miller is the creator of 300, but the vibe is more early Sam Raimi. Gabriel Macht could certainly go chin-to-chin with Bruce Campbell in a battle royale of dorky machismo.":up:

...and this one too: "The biggest compliment, though, is to Frank Miller who manages to create, with his first feature film, a definite style.":yay:


And the review also call the film obviously 'high camp.' Which I don't think is what Miller actually intended is it? Did he really intend to parody himself?
 
I don't care for Ebert but I do think that BladeRunner's only value is it's visuals and score. I didn't care for Ford's performance, the story or any of the characters really. The only character I felt a little bit of emotion for is Roy Batty but thats mostly because of Hauer performance near the end of the film.

Then again Scott's movies almost always leave me feeling cold. He is a good visual director but one cold ass man and I just don't dig that.
 
And the review also call the film obviously 'high camp.' Which I don't think is what Miller actually intended is it? Did he really intend to parody himself?

No, but Miller intends it to have humorous moments. People tend to confuse the word campy with the word funny.
 
Indeed, something that happened quite a lot with Punisher: War Zone.

In any case, reviews or not, I plan on seeing this. It has a Christmas release, so I may see it later on in theaters, or if not, catch the DVD. I'm leaning towards the latter, despite wanting to see this badly...it's just that a Christmas release is bad timing...at least for me.
 
he reviews, or talks about, the Final Cut of Blade Runner and he speaks favorably about it. He also considers it a "great movie". Personally, i'm not too fond of the the voice-over version of the film either, though.

I love that voice-over narration, which gives another dimension to Deckard by letting you inside his head. There was a noir style voice-over narration for Deckard attached to the original script by Hampton Fancher.
 
I love that voice-over narration, which gives another dimension to Deckard by letting you inside his head. There was a noir style voice-over narration for Deckard attached to the original script by Hampton Fancher.

Oh certainly, and i don't disagree. I just feel it takes away from the emotion that we're seeing. Like at the end when Roy Batty gives his little soliloquy and dies. Without the voice-over, it's really powerful. With the voice-over, it comes in 2 seconds after he dies and i'm like "AAAARRRG!!", because it really took the impact of the seen away. The silence, without the V.O., until Gaff shows up is just :wow:
 
No, but Miller intends it to have humorous moments. People tend to confuse the word campy with the word funny.

I don't that reviewer is confusing the film with just being 'funny.' He calls it 'obviously high camp.' I think it's really a backhanded compliment b/c I don't Miller intended to make a self-parody in high camp style. I think the reviewer doesn't get that Miller was trying to be 'serious.' I think the reviewer sees it in the same vein as the old Batman TV show.
 
I like Ebert, for the most part. But as I've stated, he can be quite random at times. I mean, this man actually thought Conan The Destroyer was better than Conan The Barbarian!:huh: Ebert also didn't like the first X-Men. I'm just saying.
 
Last edited:
Here's another positive review in The Miami Herald: http://www.miamiherald.com/entertainment/movies/news/story/824526.html


The Spirit (PG-13) *** | Treatment does comics crimefighter justice

Samuel L. Jackson, center, and Scarlett Johansson, right, and Louis Lombardi, rear, in The Spirit. LIONSGATE

BY RICK BENTLEY

McClatchy News Service

The bold visual strokes comic artist Frank Miller used to create Sin City revealed he was the only director who could do justice to the film version of Will Eisner's ground-breaking comic series The Spirit.
Eisner redefined comics in the 1940s and early '50s with his creation of a print version of the film-noir style. His stories were gritty. He used humor like a hidden weapon, exposed only when he needed to make a point.
Miller has shown the same in-your-face skill in the creation of his comics and films. The result of Miller's vision of Eisner's The Spirit is a visual explosion ignited by at times campy acting and melodrama so thick it will hurt your teeth. It's hard not to grimace when one character tells a wounded partner: ``Just shut up and bleed.''
But a traditional presenting of The Spirit would have ended up looking like the lame 1994 Alec Baldwin disaster The Shadow. And going as bleak as The Dark Knight would not have exposed the fanciful aspects of the character.
Only Miller's vision of a world that often exists only in silhouette or shadows is suitable for telling this tale.
The Spirit leaps right into the depths of the comic strip. Viewers are given flashbacks as to how Denny Colt goes from an aw-shucks hero to midnight vigilante. But the look back is only a courtesy glimpse. This film is about the Spirit's (Gabriel Macht) unstoppable attempts to do good as he clashes with the never-ending evil of the Octopus (Samuel L. Jackson).
Macht manages to meld macho with melodrama to make the Spirit come to life. It was not an easy job. The character dances so close to lunacy that the edge always seems too close for comfort.
The story moves along with the aid of the intoxicating Sand Saref (Eva Mendes), the complicated Silken Floss (Scarlett Johansson) and the death-in-waiting Lorelei Rox (Jaime King). These are such strong, tough and alluring characters they can be forgiven for a few moments of total acting insanity. The only one who can't be forgiven is Jackson, whose big onscreen rants have worn thin.
Miller's visual style is like a hallucination. Imagery slips from reality to fantasy in a blink. A mix of old and new costuming and technology gives the movie a timeless feel as it embraces the two-dimensional world of comics and then slides into a complicated tale of love lost. Under Miller's guidance the result is a loyal and loving tribute.
 
Last edited:
Here's one from Rotten Tomatoes:


Its like walking into your office and finding a buxom, leggy blonde on your desk, begging for your help. Its going to be so much fun, how can you say no?
by Fiore Mastracci | December 24, 2008


THE SPIRIT

I walked into the screening for the SPIRIT with no expectations. Why should I? What was the use? Another movie based on a comic; they were a dime a dozen these days. Besides, I'm selective about my comic reading; almost picky. THE SPIRIT hadn't been on my list, so you could say I went in untainted. Couldn't say the same for the other 'critics' present. Oh, they looked like critics, but they were hiding behind the fear and intimidation this city dishes out like checks at the first of the month. Mousy dames and rotund scribes filled with self-importance who cower when the real bad guys stand in their way.

Some diamond dapper named Frank Miller penned and directed this film. He's always been known for being a bit touched. The city can do that to you. You see too much of its dirty underbelly and something snaps. Everyone knows it and prays it doesn't happen to them. It happened to Miller, and this time, it really showed. This SPIRIT was so far over the top no one knew what to make of it. They scratched their heads and tried to shield the bewildered look on their faces. Not me. I laughed. I got it. I knew what Miller was doing. It was a send up. He'd had enough of all those dime graphic novels making millions in celluloid, so he lambasted them in the only manner he knew how. Yeah, I understood Miller. Maybe he wasn't so touched after all. I laughed more at this movie than any other movie this year, save for "Tropic Thunder".

So as I sat in my worn-out theatre chair and felt the stickiness of week old soda and candy on the floor, I realized some gunsle named Bill Pope and a broad called Nancy St. John were responsible for the look of THE SPIRIT. He was a Director of Photography and she was FX Supervisor; yeah, she supervised alright. They took Miller's ideas and transformed them into visual eroticism. I was lookin' at somethin' that bounced from real life to animation and any combination between. It was weird, but it was fun. Perhaps too much fun. It confused the others. While I laughed, they gave me the icy stare and cold shoulder. Any minute, the coppers would come and pull a Minsky. Then the real fun would start.

But I stayed. I stayed because I liked the idea of Scarlett Johansson and Eva Mendes both flashing too much leg and cleavage for evil and good. I couldn't hold back the laughter of Samuel L. Jackson dressed as a Nazi Officer for an interrogation scene, complete with cant camera angles reminiscent of the "Batman" TV series. There was a hero, Gabriel Macht, who could seduce any woman by merely saying 'hello' and a torturer in what could barely be called a dance skirt named Plaster of Paris. Who can keep a straight face with these kinds of shenanigans? Not me; nor would I even try!

I'd seen something like this movie before. It reminded me of "Pulp Fiction" and "Sin City" all mixed carelessly with "Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow". But this had a new twist. Something had set Miller over the fence. Cheap tequila, single malt scotch, something stronger? I didn't know, and I didn't want to find out. I just knew I was enjoying the show and whatever was scratching his soul could just keep on scratching. There was something familiar about the opening song, too. Some cat named Elfman had written a tune that sounded just like it down at the Oingo Boingo Club. Wouldn't be surprised if there was legal trouble there; but that wasn't my concern %u2013 at least not yet.

So while the urchins scrambled looking for something familiar they could identify with, I enjoyed a novel type of movie. THE SPIRIT was funny. It looked good, too; like a tall leggy blonde sitting on your desk when you return to the office. Some won't get it; some never do. But if you're looking for a film so bizarre it's stimulating, then THE SPIRIT is your ticket. You can check out these scenes.

KEY SCENES TO LOOK FOR:
1. THE FIGHT IN THE BOG
2. THE SILOUHETTE FIGHTS
3. ANY SCENE WITH LADY DEATH

THE RATING FOR SPIRIT = A
BFCA RATING = 9/10
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,266
Messages
22,075,113
Members
45,875
Latest member
kedenlewis
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"