• The upgrade to XenForo 2.3.7 has now been completed. Please report any issues to our administrators.

Robin Hood Reboot with Taron Egerton/Jamie Foxx

Wow, I couldn't even make it through that trailer.

This looks like a real stinker.
 
As far as I know Russell Crowe's career is not exactly sprightly either.

I think DarkKnight88 meant to refer to Russell Crowe's Robin Hood movie which came out in 2010 (https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0955308/), instead of Kevin Costner's 1991 movie.

But yeah, no one's asking for another Robin Hood movie. And as far as I'm concerned, the only ones that exist are Disney's 1973 movie and Men in Tights which is a classic. ;)
 
How did Costner's acting career stumble out of a grave to do Yellowstone?

In recent years he's done Man of Steel, Hidden Figures, Jack Ryan, and just last year Molly's Game.


Costner has been working steadily in decently high-profile movies.

Can't forget Draft Day!
 
Is this Foxx’ first attempt at a English accent in a movie? At least he’s trying. It’s understated but fine.

In a movie, maybe...

tumblr_m2e5vg4cih1r1e3s3o1_500.jpg
 
Watched the trailer again... it will be lucky to make 20 million opening weekend.
 
Watched the trailer again... it will be lucky to make 20 million opening weekend.

This won't even finish in the top 3 after Wreck-It Ralph 2, Creed II and Fantastic Beasts 2 in its second weekend.

Honestly, if they hadn't started filming this before Guy Ritchie's King Arthur movie came out, they might have seen how horribly that did and cancelled the whole thing.
 
It looks like it could be fun, but it's so absurdly anachronistic and modern looking. Public rioters throwing molotovs at riot police with shields.
Look at this shot:

2zxpcmg.jpg


Just glancing at that it looks like a scene from a film set in modern times.

More:

i2ks3r.jpg


34g0b2b.jpg
 
1. I will say it before and I will undoubtedly say it again but Taran is a bland and charisma challenged presence on screen. He's always the least interesting performer in the films where he is supposed to be the lead and this seems to indicate that hasn't changed. There is a reason Firth was brought back in the Kingsman sequel.

2. Ya'll need Jesus or to drop the nostalgia goggles. Costner was not the definitive Robin Hood and in fact in it's day the movie was far from being this embraced blockbuster. If it made money it's because Costner was on a hot streak but I remember audience response being tepid. There's a reason Elewes does that "English accent" joke in Men In Tights. I feel we really need to start talking about the difference between earned nostalgic connection and "stuff that played on cable a lot when I was a kid." We all love Rickman. He's the best thing in the movie. He's also the only standout thing in the movie (okay... Winncott is pretty good too) which is a lackluster slog at best. It neither exciting or romantic. I get feels listening to Everything I Do I Do It For You but that's cuz Bryan Adams is a slick writer of love ballads.


3. The definitive Robin Hood is still Flynn. No film has captured the swash buckling badassness of Robin walking into Prince John's feast with a stag around his shoulders knocking out the guards with the dead deer's body.
 
Who are you directing your "drop the nostalgia goggles" comment to? Costner's Robin Hood not being a good movie is hardly an unpopular opinion.
 
I dont think it's a question of whether Costner's film is good. Speaking for myself and some others I've grown up with in the 90s the Costner film does have some nostalgia love. We know his accent is dodgy wnd the film has cheese and hasnt aged well, but many still enjoy it because thats the Robin Hood film they grew up with.
 
It doesn't look great, but it doesn't look especially bad, either. It's not pretending to be anything that it's not; an action movie featuring a young Robin Hood. Looks kind of mediocre, but it could be entertaining. Some of the action looks pretty solid.
 
It looks like it could be fun, but it's so absurdly anachronistic and modern looking. Public rioters throwing molotovs at riot police with shields.
Look at this shot:

2zxpcmg.jpg


Just glancing at that it looks like a scene from a film set in modern times.

More:

i2ks3r.jpg


34g0b2b.jpg

So, so bad.
 
It doesn't look great, but it doesn't look especially bad, either. It's not pretending to be anything that it's not; an action movie featuring a young Robin Hood. Looks kind of mediocre, but it could be entertaining. Some of the action looks pretty solid.
it looks worse than King Arthur: Legend of the Sword.
 
It looks like it could be fun, but it's so absurdly anachronistic and modern looking. Public rioters throwing molotovs at riot police with shields.
Look at this shot:

2zxpcmg.jpg


Just glancing at that it looks like a scene from a film set in modern times.

More:

i2ks3r.jpg


34g0b2b.jpg

They should've just gone full sci-fi/science fantasy with this take.
 
1. I will say it before and I will undoubtedly say it again but Taran is a bland and charisma challenged presence on screen. He's always the least interesting performer in the films where he is supposed to be the lead and this seems to indicate that hasn't changed. There is a reason Firth was brought back in the Kingsman sequel.

That's definitely not why Firth was brought back :funny:
 
Basically just looks like the tone of King Arthur with the exact same coloring to boot.
 
I honestly think we've gone so far beyond what Robin Hood should be that the only solution to making this character relevant again is to take things back to an Errol Flynn style swash buckling adventure. The sword fighting alone in the Errol Flynn movie is amazing and fun to this day. For nearly a hundred years they've tried just about everything they can to make Robin Hood work as a serious character and it's just not working.
 
looks like a tv movie, infact, not even a tv movie... looks like a music video to an aerosmith song... like aerosmith now days...
 
They should've just gone full sci-fi/science fantasy with this take.


Im still waiting for that to be the revealed twist angle of the film.


Im just so sure this is set in the future but in a kind of post post-apocalypse kind of way. I haven't been following this movie since the first trailer but if there aren't TV spots out yet ruining that "surprise" then I expect them closer to the release date.. If not and im completely wrong well yeh this looks **** and weird.
 
Why would anyone think Robin Hood could work in a futuristic setting?
 
Im still waiting for that to be the revealed twist angle of the film.


Im just so sure this is set in the future but in a kind of post post-apocalypse kind of way. I haven't been following this movie since the first trailer but if there aren't TV spots out yet ruining that "surprise" then I expect them closer to the release date.. If not and im completely wrong well yeh this looks **** and weird.

It’s not. They are just wearing modern day clothing for some reason.
 
Most people feel Alan Rickman stole Prince Of Thieves from Costner who was a bland Robin Hood. Rickman's memorable pantomime villain performance is what most people remember about the movie. Even when the film came out Rickman was the one who got most the plaudits for his performance.
 
Why would anyone think Robin Hood could work in a futuristic setting?

Because class warfare, the rich oppressing the poor, and the poor trying survive in a world run by the rich and powerful arent unique to any single time period. Stories like robin hood and King Arthur can take place in a futuristic setting as easily as a medieval setting. Or on any planet populated by sentient species. And the magic of king Arthur can exist alongside scifi tech or be replaced by scifi tech.

It's the same for a bunch of other timeless legends and myths. They all contain universal ideas, characters, plots and themes that can be transplanted to other worlds and times. Pretty sure Joseph Campbell wrote a famous book about this.


Most people feel Alan Rickman stole Prince Of Thieves from Costner who was a bland Robin Hood. Rickman's memorable pantomime villain performance is what most people remember about the movie. Even when the film came out Rickman was the one who got most the plaudits for his performance.

Yeah when someone mentions the Sheriff of Nottingham I think of Rickman in Prince of Thieves. I'm pretty damn confident that Mendelsohn's CEO of Nottingham won't be eclipsing Rickman's Sheriff.
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,262
Messages
22,074,428
Members
45,876
Latest member
kedenlewis
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"