So what exactly do they mean by "restart"?

Discussion in 'Misc. Films' started by Nell2ThaIzzay, Mar 25, 2006.

  1. Nell2ThaIzzay

    Nell2ThaIzzay Registered

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2005
    Messages:
    16,633
    Likes Received:
    0
    I've heard the term "restart" tossed out there for Casino Royale...

    Now, I am a pretty big James Bond fan. I have every Bond movie except for the unofficial Bond movie, Never Say Never Again... And I dunno much about Craig, but I must admit I'm kinda skeptical because Brosnan was awesome.

    But, this whole "restart" business... they aren't doing a Batman Begins and trying to make this a new Bond franchise, are they? I've already heard there won't be any Q, or gadgets or anything (which sucks, because the Q character, whether played by Desmond or Cleese was awesome, and the cars that flip over onto their sides, drive on their own, fly, and shoot rockets out of their headlights are awesome!)

    I'm hoping that by "restart", they just mean, the beginning of a new era, with a new Bond (Craig), and they don't try to make a new franchise, and change the stuff that made Bond, Bond.
     
  2. Threshold

    Threshold Simply Amazing

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2004
    Messages:
    5,913
    Likes Received:
    0
    They've decided to restart the franchise and make it more character-centric instead of concept-centric. Meaning these new films won't be centered around the next big baddie that Bond has to go up against, but about exploring a different side of Bond and seeing the character on his journey through life as a 00 agent. It's basically taking the series back to the way that Flemming had originally intended.
     
  3. Nell2ThaIzzay

    Nell2ThaIzzay Registered

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2005
    Messages:
    16,633
    Likes Received:
    0
    So they are basically saying that it is a "new" franchise? The way Batman Begins is a new franchise, not related to the Burton or Schumacher films?

    Or just, "restart" as in, they are just taking it in a different direction than before?
     
  4. Threshold

    Threshold Simply Amazing

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2004
    Messages:
    5,913
    Likes Received:
    0
    Considering the film begins with Bond getting his license to kill for the first time, I'm thinking it's a full-on restart.
     
  5. Nell2ThaIzzay

    Nell2ThaIzzay Registered

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2005
    Messages:
    16,633
    Likes Received:
    0
    Well ****, sorry for making this thread, I just noticed (and finished reading through) the other "re-start" thread.

    I musta missed it, because I scanned the forums before I made this thread to try to avoid a re-post, seeing as how I haven't checked out these forums and didn't want to re-post something that's already been talked about (apparently for 3 pages already). So yea, sorry about that.

    And as for this being a re-start...

    Well, no Pierce Brosnan, and now this movie being a restart, it's hard for me to anticipate this installment the way I did with all the others since I've been a fan. I'm just not liking the ideas in place behind this movie.
     
  6. spidey-dude

    spidey-dude Y.N.W.A

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2005
    Messages:
    7,870
    Likes Received:
    4
    ^really i havn't enjoyed a jb film since goldeneye so i welcome this, maybe my £5 ticket will get me more than a film advertising cars i cant afford and women i wont have the oppertunity to sleep with
     
  7. Nell2ThaIzzay

    Nell2ThaIzzay Registered

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2005
    Messages:
    16,633
    Likes Received:
    0
    I highly enjoyed all of the Brosnan Bond movies. They are all among my favorites.
     
  8. SpyderDan

    SpyderDan Registered

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2004
    Messages:
    1,062
    Likes Received:
    0
    What really kills me about their attempt to "Batman Begins-ize" the 007 series is the fact that there's no continuity in this series anyway. Both M and Moneypenny changes actresses without much acknowlegdment. The only noticeable changes were Desmond to Cleese and Judi Dench as M. Speaking of which, Dench's M is distinct characteristic of Brosnan's era. So if this is back to basics and ignores everything that's happened in the series for the last 10 years or so, why is Dench back as M? It doesn't make a whole lot of sense to me.
     
  9. Octoberist

    Octoberist point blank

    Joined:
    May 13, 2005
    Messages:
    46,503
    Likes Received:
    11
    My issue is this: This can't be a total restart; it's like a 'half assed restart'. Sure, the last couple of Bond movies didn't fare well with some, but its not to the point of saying "Hey, let's start all over again."

    In other words, if they mean "a total restart" ala NO GUN BARREL SEQUENCE or NO JAMES BOND THEME, then yeah, nobody will accept it. Nobody.

    They can touch Batman, but NO ONE can touch James Bond. Actually, it would be insulting to the past Bonds if they did an absoulte restart.

    Change is good. TOO MUCH change can dig a deeper hole....
     
  10. Nell2ThaIzzay

    Nell2ThaIzzay Registered

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2005
    Messages:
    16,633
    Likes Received:
    0
    :up:

    And change for the sake of change doesn't help matters either.

    And that's what this "re-start" sounds like to me; change for the sake of change.
     
  11. Two-Face

    Two-Face Harvey Dent

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2003
    Messages:
    48,170
    Likes Received:
    1

    I agree, No Q or Moneypenny then Dench is back as M so this is a restart? my ass is restart and this is sounds like "prequel" more then a restart.
     
  12. Kevin Roegele

    Kevin Roegele Do you mind if I don't?

    Joined:
    May 2, 2000
    Messages:
    23,843
    Likes Received:
    37
    I seriously doubt it will be very different to previous Bond movies. As Lee Tamohori says, no matter what is done to try and change the series, 'the Bond machine kicks in', which means action, babes and cool vehicles, the usual mayhem. Casino Royale will be the same.
     
  13. Everyman

    Everyman Registered

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2003
    Messages:
    6,448
    Likes Received:
    0
    Well, I sure hope it will be closer to a normal Bond flick than Tamahori's videogame demo.
     
  14. Kevin Roegele

    Kevin Roegele Do you mind if I don't?

    Joined:
    May 2, 2000
    Messages:
    23,843
    Likes Received:
    37
    I think it will be more akin to From Russia With Love, For Your Eyes Only, The Living Daylights, that sort of vibe. As well as, of course, The Borne Identity.
     
  15. SpyderDan

    SpyderDan Registered

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2004
    Messages:
    1,062
    Likes Received:
    0
    And yet it doesn't work as a prequel either, because obviously Dench's M became acquainted with Bond in Goldeneye.
     
  16. Seen

    Seen It's Been Seen

    Joined:
    May 17, 2003
    Messages:
    5,164
    Likes Received:
    1
    According to EW, it's a complete and utter restart. However the casting of Judi Dench as M, as stated before, is quite puzzling.
     
  17. Nell2ThaIzzay

    Nell2ThaIzzay Registered

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2005
    Messages:
    16,633
    Likes Received:
    0
    I still want to know -why- there is a restart...

    Bond has been going for 20 movies strong now. Sure, not all have been as good as the others, but it's not like this series is suffering from being alaughing stock or anything.

    Oh, I know why they are doing it... cuz Batman did it, and it's the Hollywood fad right now... :rolleyes:

    I am really disappointed by this.

    My anticipation for this Bond movie:

    |
    \/

    |
    \/

    |
    \/

    |
    \/
     
  18. SpyderDan

    SpyderDan Registered

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2004
    Messages:
    1,062
    Likes Received:
    0
    I don't know why you're so surprised that they're going with the hottest trend. The Bond producers have always done that.
     
  19. D'Artagnan

    D'Artagnan Registered

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2006
    Messages:
    155
    Likes Received:
    0
    I see it this way.

    Over the last five movies, the producers have been trying to add more to the character of Bond. Licence to Kill gave him a personal vendetta, GoldenEye did the same, Tomorrow Never Dies saw an old lover coem back to him and then die, TWINE had him fall in love and then betrayed, and Die Another Day had Bond actually captured by the bad guys and disgarded by M.

    How can you go further than that? How else can you establish Bond's character? By going back to his origins and seeing how he became the man he is today. You could either do a film set in the 60's or late 50's as a prequel to Dr No (which in itself would create questions such as, "If Bond was 30/40 around 1960, how come he's around 40 in Die Another Day in 2002?"), or you can ignore previous movies, which is what Casino Royale is doing.
     
  20. SpyderDan

    SpyderDan Registered

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2004
    Messages:
    1,062
    Likes Received:
    0
    As long as the film feels fresh and different, I'll be happy. In a series of 20-something films, you gotta leave room for experimentation. That's how the smaller Bond films like License to Kill and Casino Royale fit into the series.
     
  21. James"007"Bond

    James"007"Bond Registered

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2005
    Messages:
    1,694
    Likes Received:
    0
    This whole restart business is definately puzzling. All thy had to do was stick to the same scrip they have minus, Bond getting his license to kill and have casino royale just be another Bond adventure.
     
  22. I like to think of it as Refreshing the series..not restarting.
     
  23. Octoberist

    Octoberist point blank

    Joined:
    May 13, 2005
    Messages:
    46,503
    Likes Received:
    11
    As much as I love Batman Begins, it was a double edge sword: Idiotic producers might use Batman (and maybe Casino Royale) as a 'basis' for their reason in 'restarting' a franchise.

    For example, some idiot might go "Since Godfather Part III sucked, let's restart the series!" Their reasoning: "Well, it worked for Batman and James Bond".

    Then you'll see studios starting to use the term 'restarting' instead of 'remaking', which are the same damn thing.

    So I just hope that Hollywood won't fall into that...
     
  24. seishin87

    seishin87 Registered

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2005
    Messages:
    298
    Likes Received:
    1
    I don't think that Batman Begins was the sole reason for this whole restart idea. The fact that BB was a hit did play a role. Wilson and Babs wanted to do a origin story "restart" for Bond showing his first mission and how he gets his "00" in a gritty/realistic spy thriller after Moore left the role but Cubby didn't think it was the right move at the time. Now with Cubby gone, the rights to Casino Royale(the original Bond tale) finally with EON, Brosnan's departure and that these restarts, remakes, prequels seem to be the in thing and you have the chance to take the franchise in a direction you've wanted for almost 20 years, why not?
     
  25. James"007"Bond

    James"007"Bond Registered

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2005
    Messages:
    1,694
    Likes Received:
    0
    Hollywood aren't that smart.
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"