Chris Wallace said:What stereotype? That he was a bland, lame character who stood around like a useless paperweight until they found some excuse to introduce water into the story?
You forget one minor detail; both Batman and Hulk have had their own movies, cartoons, etc.Chris Wallace said:These types of portrayals do not taint the character for years to come. You probably think there are people out there who think Batman's supposed to be campy & happy-go-lucky, & the Hulk's supposed to be a 300 lb. bodybuilder whose alter ego is named David.
I've forgotten nothing; I was being sarcastic.CConn said:You forget one minor detail; both Batman and Hulk have had their own movies, cartoons, etc.
Aquaman has had very little exposure beyond the Super Friends, and thusly, there's nowhere in the mainstream media for people to learn he's more than just that crappy side character.
Could have fooled me.Chris Wallace said:I've forgotten nothing; I was being sarcastic.
CConn said:You forget one minor detail; both Batman and Hulk have had their own movies, cartoons, etc.
Aquaman has had very little exposure beyond the Super Friends, and thusly, there's nowhere in the mainstream media for people to learn he's more than just that crappy side character.
Isildur´s Heir said:By major studios, you mean WB, right?
And with Batman Begins, Superman Returns, Wonder Woman and Flash, an Aquaman movie will happen, sooner or later.
It might suck (or not), but it will happen...
It's a shame too, the current Aquaman run is sex.Peyton Westlake said:Thats why I think major studios will steer clear of the water boy.
Peyton Westlake said:Yes, I mean WB or Universal, etc. any studio that would give it a huge budget.
Isildur´s Heir said:
Aquaman is a DC character, and DC belongs to WB, so, there aren´t anyother major studios.
Too true, too true.Isildur´s Heir said:
Aquaman is a DC character, and DC belongs to WB, so, there aren´t anyother major studios.
Did you read my post?CConn said:Could have fooled me.
![]()
I just thought you were being an idiot.Chris Wallace said:Did you read my post?
The part where I said that those portrayals DON'T taint the character for years to come should've been a hint.
That may well be, but if we get one the other's gonna be a tough sell.OmeletDeFromage said:I think Namor would make a better movie if done right. The one their currently planning sounds so wrong, though. It sounds more like an Aquaman story.
Contrary to what most think, Namor and Aquaman aren't that much alike. Aquaman's more of a standard superhero (as most people know him outside the comics); from his origin, he's practically an underwater Superman. Namor was the original anti-hero. He's a conflicted character; he had no love for the humankind, practically waged war against it, but was at odds with the fact that he himself was half human. Great dramatic potential for a movie there.