Do Black Holes Create New Universes? Q&A With Physicist Lee Smolin
http://www.space.com/21335-black-holes-time-universe-creation.html
http://www.space.com/21335-black-holes-time-universe-creation.html
www.cbc.ca said:Big asteroid with its own moon flies by Earth
Asteroid 1998 QE2 made closest approach at 4:59 p.m. ET on May 31st
An asteroid the size of Vancouver's Stanley Park, and which has its own moon, zipped past the Earth today, NASA says.
At 4:59 p.m. ET Friday, the pair of space rocks, known together as a binary asteroid, made their closest approach to Earth for the next two centuries at 5.8 million kilometres away, or about 15 times the distance between the Earth and the moon. That is considered a safe distance and the asteroid is not at risk of hitting the Earth.
The 2.7-kilometre-wide asteroid, 1998 QE2, was discovered 15 years ago, but no one knew about its travelling companion until the smaller rock showed up in radar images captured Wednesday evening. The satellite or moon is about 600 metres wide or about three times the width of Toronto's Rogers Centre.
WWWHHHAAATTT?
Astronomers Find First Evidence Of Other Universes
http://www.technologyreview.com/view/421999/astronomers-find-first-evidence-of-other-universes/
Yeah theory-wise it's not that new, and they are well cautious/conservative about this as new "evidence", nothing to get that mind-blown about.eh, I can't get excited about this. It's total guess work. I need hard science facts before i'd believe in a multiverse (as much as I would love to!!!)
Cosmologists should have a decent data set to play with in a couple of years or so. When they get it, these circles should either spring into clear view or disappear into noise (rather like the mysterious Mars face that appeared in pictures of the red planet taken by Viking 1 and then disappeared in the higher resolution shots from the Mars Global Surveyor).
Will we see a time when we actually do have to move/change the course of one of these things, curious how it's finally best pulled off. - http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=xaW4Ol3_M1o#t=388sThe link below will take you to the article which is longer than the quote above and includes video.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/story/2013/05/31/tech-asteroid-earth-flyby.html
My friend and I were just talking about how we wanted some evidence of a multiverse. I am very happy to see there are some clues coming out earlier than I expected. I hope more stuff comes out.
Super powered Jet Pack!The biggest hurdle at this point is having a vehicle able to launch the astronauts back from the Martian surface.
18 months I believe.
The biggest hurdle at this point is having a vehicle able to launch the astronauts back from the Martian surface.
Missions to the Red Planet would take several years to complete and, during that time, astronauts would face health risks from two main types of radiation: cosmic rays and energetic particles from the sun, associated with solar flares and coronal mass ejections. Both types of radiation can damage DNA and increase the risk of an astronaut developing cancer.
On missions in low-Earth orbit, which include all shuttle flights and stays on the International Space Station, astronauts are largely protected from the most harmful effects of the radiation thanks to the Earth's magnetic field, which creates a bubble around the planet that deflects much of the radiation. In interplanetary space, however, astronauts will not have this protection.
Nasa's guidelines say that astronauts should not be exposed to more than 1,000 millisieverts (mSv) of radiation in a lifetime, which is associated with a 5% increase in risk of developing a fatal cancer. According to the latest study, based on data from MSL's Radiation Assessment Detector (RAD), astronauts on a 360-day round trip to Mars would get a dose of 662mSv on their journey.
"In terms of accumulated dose, it's like getting a whole-body CT scan once every five or six days," said Cary Zeitlin, a principal scientist in the Space Science and Engineering Division of the Southwest Research Institute in Boulder, Colorado, who led the study.
Yeah, but don't mission scenarios depict it as a one way trip? It's unfeasible as a round trip.
I still think we should work on getting artifical gravity on ships and radiation protection before we bother going any farther than the moon.