Venom Drool
Guest
- Joined
- Jul 8, 2001
- Messages
- 14,045
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31

Venom Drool said:there is way too much clutter in the marvel universe right now, let alone spideys world. theres always something going on the is in some way earthshattering.. his introduction into the avengers set this off me thinks. i liked the idea at first but then The Other had this 12 issues series about...nothing.. and..him regrowing an eye and killing a pretty good villan. then he gets a new suit which overall.. is craptastic.. then theres a civil war and well...jesus. he has to unmask and... cant he get a break. cant all the villans and all the mystics and bull**** end for sometime. i wouldnt mind seeing some of those sensational spiderman arcs come to the major titles like ASM. More and more i see spidey not fitting on this save the world team. hes not cut out for all the politics. never was. which is one reason he avoided them. then i discover theres civil war frontline which shows us how the public is dealing with his unmasking. ive had it up to here. so inever thought id resort to it.. but right now.. im picking up USM, ASM, SSM when it suits me (upcomming arc looks promising as did the previous but was blarghed up by crappy madamne ****ty web) and at this particular period in MarvelU, CW just cause id like to know whats going on. screw all the added crap like directors cut and frontline, and friendly neighbourhood which is somewhere and nowhere in continuity? too much clutter.. too complicated and headachey to follow whats going on without dishing out 100$ in a month and a hlaf span...
I think they need one writer on both, so the three titles can be consistent.JackBauer said:like I said on another thread: get Brian K. Vaughan and put him in ASM. one of the best writers in the biz right now, who gets the character, and knows how to deal with continuity like few.
then, you put Kirkman on Sensational.
finally, Slott on FNSM (that idea I have to give to photojones2, who posted in another thread). he's also one of the few who can deal easily with continuity.
Personally, I'd say Aguirre-Sacasa is doing a good enough job where I wouldn't take him off the title unless he requested it. But other than that, damn good choices.JackBauer said:like I said on another thread: get Brian K. Vaughan and put him in ASM. one of the best writers in the biz right now, who gets the character, and knows how to deal with continuity like few.
then, you put Kirkman on Sensational.
finally, Slott on FNSM (that idea I have to give to photojones2, who posted in another thread). he's also one of the few who can deal easily with continuity.
But do we really want that consistancy? I mean, one of the best things about having more than one book for a character, IMO, is how you can see different aspects of the character, in each different book. If you have one writer on more than one book, it basically turns into little more than one, bi-weekly, series.Sloth7d said:I think they need one writer on both, so the three titles can be consistent.
And that writer still should be Tom Defaulco.
He was the best.
JackBauer said:like I said on another thread: get Brian K. Vaughan and put him in ASM. one of the best writers in the biz right now, who gets the character, and knows how to deal with continuity like few.
then, you put Kirkman on Sensational.
finally, Slott on FNSM (that idea I have to give to photojones2, who posted in another thread). he's also one of the few who can deal easily with continuity.
SpideyInATree said:Personally, if Quesada would have been a little more smarter, and this was one of his dumber moves, but he lost Geoff Johns. You see what Geoff Johns did for The Flash? Imagine what that man could have done with Spider-man.
Nuff Said.
SpideyInATree said:As for Vaughn. He's fine on Runaways as is. And Y The Last Man is freakin' fantastic. Let him focus on those two great pieces of work.
SpideyInATree said:Remember Jeph Loeb will be writing an ongoing Spidey book in 2007. You know, the same guy who wrote Spider-Man: Blue.
But look at the three books now. Their stories are all over the place. And they can't seem to get one right.CConn said:But do we really want that consistancy? I mean, one of the best things about having more than one book for a character, IMO, is how you can see different aspects of the character, in each different book. If you have one writer on more than one book, it basically turns into little more than one, bi-weekly, series.
Sloth7d said:But look at the three books now. Their stories are all over the place. And they can't seem to get one right.
Current titles=
FNM=Tries too hard
SSM=Just not good
AMS=Does'nt try hard enogh, making most stories....*yawn*....*goes to sleep*......Huh?....I'm up...I'm up!
Eitherway, I'd just be happy if I saw Defaulco on AMS again. He was pure genius.
AuntMay: OMG! MaryJane, why is that knife in your hand?spideylover89 said:I agree with the first and third one, but SSM kicks ass. The whole Stegron climax may have been a bit disappointing, but the story was still good and the latest issue with Doc Ock was excellent. It actually payed attention to continuity...Big Shocker!![]()
Sloth7d said:........................Comic guy from Simsons:Worst story ever!
Okay Thats the worst story ever. Alternate Ben Parker just die already.spideylover89 said:Okay now that's a stretch. Your'e trying to tell me Feral is worse than Sins Past, The Other, Sins Remembered, Avengers Disassembled (spectacular spidey), and Hobgoblin 2211? No way![]()
Sloth7d said:My dreamline of writers for the spiderman story arcs.
FrankMiller on SSM
Fiona Avery on FHSM
and
Tom Defaulco on AMSM
spideylover89 said:Okay now that's a stretch. Your'e trying to tell me Feral is worse than Sins Past, The Other, Sins Remembered, Avengers Disassembled (spectacular spidey), and Hobgoblin 2211? No way![]()