Why aren't feminist all over this, and places like the Playboy mansion, etc? These events are obviously about a woman physical appearance....
Beauty contests and pageants still reproduce the dysfunctional belief that superficial characteristics such as appearance grants what someone says or believes more legitimacy. The fact that women willingly participate makes it worse than some other forms of prejudice because they're actively reinforcing a hegemony that damages gender discourse.
It might not be as on the nose as rights violations and wage gaps, but that it exists is just as relevant. Not to mention these kinds of pageants started out being judged much in the same way as dog shows are judged, they should be discouraged on that basis alone.
Beauty contests and pageants still reproduce the dysfunctional belief that superficial characteristics such as appearance grants what someone says or believes more legitimacy. The fact that women willingly participate makes it worse than some other forms of prejudice because they're actively reinforcing a hegemony that damages gender discourse.
Beauty contests and pageants still reproduce the dysfunctional belief that superficial characteristics such as appearance grants what someone says or believes more legitimacy. The fact that women willingly participate makes it worse than some other forms of prejudice because they're actively reinforcing a hegemony that damages gender discourse.
It might not be as on the nose as rights violations and wage gaps, but that it exists is just as relevant. Not to mention these kinds of pageants started out being judged much in the same way as dog shows are judged, they should be discouraged on that basis alone.
Why is being attractive a negative trait? These women that enter these contests are very attractive, yes, but MOST are also intelligent and have a lot more going on than what they look like in a bikini.
Miss Universe should be very attractive, highly intelligent and have the compassion to volunteer and help the less fortunate. It's called the whole package.
Who doesn't want to be attractive? No one. That's who.
First - I know nothing about the feminist movement except that it promotes equality and empowers women to make their own decisions. So from my limited understanding, the bold seems like it stands in opposition to the movement. Correct me if I'm wrong, because as I've said, I know very little of it.
Based on what Pinky said, which sounds great, the movement's more concerned with things that're actually harmful.
What's hegemonic discourse, and by what logic can one call their decision to exercise their freedom to participate or abstain problematic? Could you tailor your response to fit someone with a very, very, very superficial understanding of the concept?
Thank you in advance, DP.
edit: If it is too long to post here, shoot me a PM with some links to your resources. When I say superficial - I mean my exposure began with a couple of female colleagues that took some gender studies (which I assume would cover some of what you're talking about) and thought the classes were dumb and ends with Fury Road. So as you can see, I'm in the dark on the subject.
How did he "do a good job" of handling anything, did he take on the task of removing the absurd crown off one already "crowned" and weepy-eyed contestant, or did someone else have to do that awful task.For a change, at least. I mean, the mistake was kinda awesome and the host did a good job explaining and showing that it was his mistake.