X-Chick
Super.
- Joined
- Sep 8, 2003
- Messages
- 16,867
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
A friendly reminder to our users, please make sure your account is safe. Make sure you update your password and have an active email address to recover or change your password.
Which answer do you disagree with?
That guy is full of s#it.
There's nothing wrong with it from what I can see.The second one.
meh, there's formal language and understood language. I only got one and it was by accident i think
i'm willing to let to other ones slide but can't get the coloured card one...
if the odds of getting the first card as red have already been accounted for, then surely the remaining probability of getting the next red should be 0.5.
i have yet to read his reasoning but these sorts of problems come up in basic statistic problems, there are even formulae to deal with them.
I think his wording of the question is somewhat misleading into making you believe one probability factor has already been dealt with.
this is what happens in the question though, Tom or whoever recieves this information that he is not being killed before we are asked what is the probability it is him getting killed.And the reason this is true is because you made your choice out of three doors. Opening one of them doesn't change the fact that you picked one of three doors, not one of two. Now, had Monte opened a door, then had you pick, you would indeed have a 50-50 chance of getting it right (because you're only picking from two available doors). And in the original question of men chosen to die, you've implicitly chosen yourself (as the winning door), so there's a 1/3 chance you'll die, and a 2/3 chance it's the other guy.