EvilDeadAlive
Civilian
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2006
- Messages
- 155
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 11
Wow, did you do this? This is really well done.t:
Nice job. Thought it was legit for a moment.I did it really quick. Was gonna try to change his suit but I havent seen a good pic of the back of the new one.
Because you really have 11 girlfriends?The Harry/Venom rumor is as fake as my 10 girlfriends.

Did this quick mock-up of Shocker. I took Deathstroke, from Arrow, and just made his face all yellow.
If we were to see Shocker, I think this would be fantastic. His comic suit most likley wouldn't work. So make him mercenary-like, with straps, buckles and boots. He'd obviously still have his gauntlets.
![]()
It better be a rumor or I will go Vader on everyone at Sony.
The Harry/Venom rumor is as fake as my 10 girlfriends.
No. It hasn't. Though this rumor hit the Internet today:
"Rumor time. An anonymous source has told be that the rumors are true, Dane DeHaan does indeed factor in to Sony's plans for Venom. DeHaan getting the role of Harry Osborn in Marc Webb's Spider-Man was actually Sony's decision (remember those additional actors testing for the role after Dane DeHaan?). The studio wants DeHaan and director Josh Trank to recapture some of their Chronicle magic in a Venom spinoff. To pave the way for that to happen, Chris Zylka, Flash Thompson in the first Amazing Spider-Man will not be returning in the sequel. The seeds for Venom will be first planted in the sequel as Peter Parker will find the experimental serum that his father and Eddie Brock Sr. developed which is exactly how it plays out in the pages of Ultimate Spider-Man.
However, unlike that story, it will be Harry Osborn who eventually becomes Venom and will eventually get a solo spinoff. DeHaan's not working out so fanatically and increasing his bulk for nothing! Look for Eddie Brock Jr. to show up in THAT film, not The Amazing Spider-Man sequel. Also, Venom is not the only character currently being looked at for a solo spinoff as Sony is looking to build their own cinematic universe around Spider-Man. Keep all this in the rumor bin for now but it all sounds plausible as a potential secondary plot to the main conflict in the film."
I can understand Sony's reason behind this to want to keep ahold of Spider-Man until 2020 or whatever, but this is as bad of an idea as when Sandman shot Uncle Ben.![]()
because its an unecessary change to TWO characters. If its not necessary, then why do it? Some will say to add something new to the story, but then that becomes a story that I dont want to see because it is "wrong". I dont like changes just for the sake of change. They can bring venom in without it being Harry and being different from the "venom" in spider-man 3, but still be fresh and keep the spirit of the character. I dont understand why people get so defensive when people would prefer the stuff stay closer to source material than further.

lol
Do you all know where this stupid rumour started?
That morgue locker picture.
That's it.
Literally.
There is NOTHING *official* which said Harry could be Venom.
Just a bunch of stupid fans.
Harry Venom won't happen.
The symbiote/cancer suit won't be in this film either.
no one said the black suit would be in this film but the seeds could be planted for it for future films and well they are defo building up for something with harry, making him bulk up seems odd, unless they are trying to say he couldn't be harry because he looks to skinny or something
but overall i doubt harry will be green goblin and i doubt they will go the hob gobling route as would be no point doing a similar villian unless maybe for sinister 6
For Harry Venom to happen, the black suit sort of has to be in the film.
I can see them referencing to other things Richard was working on, like the cancer suit or something, but I doubt anything'll come of it. Especially when they still need to get GG out of the way and assuming they want to go for more than 3 movies as opposed to the repeatedly mentioned 3.
Nicely done!