The Astonishing Spider-Man

Well, the first arc wasn't so bad. I really only hated it from the Supergirl arc. Loeb ****ed that up and then it never got better.
 
I'm not familiar with DC's cluster**** that is the Supergirl continuity, so I just took it for what it was.
 
Yeah, the first arc on S/B was good. After that, meh, although I did like Absolute Power. That was fun.
 
I'm not familiar with DC's cluster**** that is the Supergirl continuity, so I just took it for what it was.
It wasn't so much the continuity, although that's pretty awful where Supergirl is concerned. It was the fact that Supergirl was a complete *****ebag and Loeb appeared to be trying to make her even more of a stuck-up ass with entitlement issues.
 
I loved Absolute power.But maybe it was Carlos Pacheco's art.
 
I wish Pacheco did something important or considerable. He seems to waste away, lost in the sea of Superman books.
 
I'm liking his run with Busiek thus far even though I am behind.
 
Yeah, but someone as good as Pacheco should be doing something a little more significant then a random Superman book.
 
Well it's one of the big two superman books.How much bigger a project do you want?Superman is the most iconic comic book hero in the world.
 
If it's DC? The Justice League. Or they could've kept him on Superman/Batman
 
Superman/Batman hasn't been good in a while.Last time I bought was only for the Ethan Van Sciver art.
 
I don't think I've ever herad anyone say they bought something specifically for Van Sciver. Anyway, I agree on S/B being crap these days. That's why I said I would've like to see Pacheco stay on it.
 
If it's DC? The Justice League. Or they could've kept him on Superman/Batman
Pacheco would kick some monster ass on the JLA, especially now that McDuffie is writing JLA stories again instead of the **** Meltzer was turning out.
 
I read Meltzer's run at the shop as the came out and I wasn't impressed by his story or the art. In fact, that relauch reminded me a lot of the New Avengers launch in that both books had boring, decompressed stories and so-so art by so called superstars.
 
Yeah, it was quite similar. Hell, you could even draw comparisons between Roy Harper's ascension to the big leagues and Spider-Man's at the beginning of Meltzer's JLA and Bendis' New Avengers, respectively--both could initially be viewed as fitting, but both were handled really, really badly.
 
I was thinking that, myself. I just didn't get the big deal with Meltzer's stuff. Benes is Benes. The fanboy community loves him, but I think he's a rip off artist. :whatever:

I'll read McDuffie's run. Depending on the artist, I may even pick it up.
 
I liked Benes on Birds of Prey. I think he's overloading his art with too much detail on JLA, though. More lines are not always better.
 
He seems to be trying to draw Jim Lee's Batman and a hybrid Art Adams/Jim Lee style for everyone else.
 
I don't think I've ever herad anyone say they bought something specifically for Van Sciver. Anyway, I agree on S/B being crap these days. That's why I said I would've like to see Pacheco stay on it.
But his talents would be wasted on that book because of the crappy stories.Also Van Sciver is one 0f my top 5 artists.
 
But his talents would be wasted on that book because of the crappy stories.Also Van Sciver is one 0f my top 5 artists.

Well, if I could've kept Pacheco on, I'd have Loeb on, too. Either Loeb or Busiek.

And if Van Sciver's in your top five, who else do you have rounding it out?
 
John Romita Jr.
George Perez
Tony Daniel
and I know I'm going to get crucified for this...Todd Mcfarlane Back in is prime.
 
Which ones aren't right.Also what are your favs.
 
Well the Tony Daniel slot is always rotating But the other four are always there.I loved Mcfarlane on Amazing Spider-man.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,290
Messages
22,080,939
Members
45,881
Latest member
lucindaschatz
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"