fabman said:Has anybody read the script or knows what the differences btw this and Akiva Goldsman's draft are?
fabman said:Have you read the script by the Batchlers... do you have it?
fabman said:yeah, in fact... i can only find akiva goldsman's draft... strange...
Kevin Roegele said:If you really want to see how good Forever could have been, check out the Peter David novelisation. David richens and develops the story, and had it been the same in the movie then Forever would be the best Batman movie.
House_of_El said:Oh really sounds good. Whats it like?
Kevin Roegele said:First and foremost, it begins with young Bruce falling into the batcave, and the giant bat approaching him and them enveloping him in his wings - really creepy, like something from Coppola's Dracula. You can see the Warner Bros board members with a big marker pen crossing that out straight away.
Kevin Roegele said:Towards the start Batman meets Harvey Dent and thanks him for clearing his name for the murder of the Ice Princess.
ab38416 said:They say that Goldsman improved on the Batchler's script and that he removed some stupid scenes like the one where Batman makes love to Chase but keeps wearing his cape and cowl.
Kevin Roegele said:The worst novelisation, I think inevitably, is Batman Returns. Because Returns is so visual, and so much about the performances, when it comes down to the story there really isn't very much of it. Still, it's a very weak book, apparently written for 12 year olds.
DocLathropBrown said:Good Lord, how that's true. How could Craig Shaw Gardner whip out the masterpiece that is the first film's book, and then the crap that is the BR book?
Goes to show that maybe Waters' script wasn't all that hot before Burton started tweaking it for production....
Does the novel have the Red Book subplot cut from the film?