:facepalm
James Tucker said that he felt he had already done what he could with the structural format of B:TAS, BB and The Batman having worked on all 3 shows and spearheaded the latter. He wanted something different and remembered the Brave & The Bold comics from his childhood. He decided to take that direction with the show cause it hadn't been done yet. He thought it was a perfect way to reintroduce a more light hearted adventurous Batman that has a role within the greater DCU and not just Gotham without having to sell out the character.
As I said before and others said after me (I'm looking at you truertothecore) the Batman from the early comics I'm talking Detective #27 - 37 here had a sense of humor and was like a swashbuckler. The only dramatic difference between him and the Batman on this show is that the TV Batman doesn't kill.
I've noticed reading through different eras within the past 20 years that Batman didn't start being obsessed with his parents death till about the 80's. At least the writers I should say weren't about that they didn't forget but they'd acknowledge it seldomly and that made it even more special. Batman's origin has been one of the most overstated indulgences for many writers especially since the 90's.
I mean if you read the 40's through 70's stuff you see a guy that's about dishing out justice not one who is consumed by his trauma. Someone who learned to overcome it but never forgets what he learned from it and lives to fight for his ideals day after day. Yeah his mission comes from not wanting what happened to him to happen to someone else but it has become far more than that by the time he is far into his career like he obviously is on this show.
The death of the wayne's in the comicsbefore my generation wasn't a deus ex machina. Writers wrote around that more often than not because there is more to a person than obsession it's only because the comics were like that for so long due to Burton movie influence I still say that people think that's what it's all about.
Considering it averages 2 million viewers every week I think it will be remembered by those viewers ten years down the line.
Only in live action film which Brave & The Bold is not.
You're fooling yourself if you didn't think it's always been a billion dollar franchise before TDK. Just off comic books, licensing and merchandising alone Batman has raked in billions. That's without factoring TV series' and movies. Hell the Adam West show you show so much disdain towards has millions of people asking for the DVD's which is why Fox and WB still having legal problems to this day. They both want to cake off of that.
What I was saying is that nothing in Batman history has ever made 1 billion within a year and they have had many attempts before. TDK is the peak performance of Batman EVER.
You're right that B&B will be remembered because so is Batman Forever and the other crap. Doesn't mean it will be remembered in good spirit. When it goes back to darkness people will look back and say...DAMN that was crap like they do with EVERY campy or lighthearted rendition before. Adam West nowadays is looked at as a JOKE and everything to do with the non DARK knight.
The reason why the obsession of his parents death has been the key element to telling this guy's story is because it's the only way to make sense of a man dressing in a Bat costume every night beating up people. It makes more sense to the psyche of an individual that he has to do that.
TDK tackled the idea since he has grown up mentally and is Batman because of more than his parents. BB showed this when the house got burned down that that chapter of his life is closed and he's not just obsessive about his parents but now about the HOPE and spirit of Gotham City being done with corruption period. He now where's the costume as a symbol of hope and by the end of Dark Knight Batman had to become the symbol of death and corruption so that the city could survive and strive bigger than him. He is not a HERO in many ways, he is only a symbol of hope and a protector who has to do whatever he has to do to keep that symbolism alive.
There is a reason why Nolan didn't make a Brave and Bold adaptation and went with everything practically after Miller's darker rendition. Because all that **** before didn't work for a psychologically effected hero. Miller found the right direction for Batman and Batman was finally grounded. The killing Joke found a home for Joker's character and Nolan finally got him cinematically correct. The 90s shows were very well recieved for a very long time cause they were using the Batman mythos of the 80s and up where as this show is going backwards on the things that were washed away with Bad taste.
For Gold to become the expensive artifact it is today it must go through a process that doesn't look pretty and isn't quite complete which is what the 40s to the 70s was for Batman. Once it came out of the fire Miller gave us GOLD along with many other profound artists and writers who went and molded the gold into pretty watches and necklaces.
U don't go back in time, just because the dirty rock was a part of the process to make beautiful gold and sell it as is. It must be refined before you give it to your wife. She will be happy with the un refined rock you give her but she will also think it's a joke until u go back and get the real thing for her. Only a stupid woman would look you dead in the eyes and say she loves the dirty rock and mean it. She knows the GOLD is coming.
B&B = unrefined mineral gold nugget rock
TDK and anything DARK knight related = refined Gold ready for a queen to wear
so B&B does have it's place in history...