Saitou Hajime
Sidekick
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2011
- Messages
- 2,628
- Reaction score
- 221
- Points
- 75
Apples and oranges IMO. It's like making me choose between Steamboat/Flair or Taker/Shawn.
Pfff Endgame is not even the best film in the MCU.
It’s like comparing The Wire with Law&Order.
I don't think TDK is the best Batman film either though. Not that it matters much since these poll results have no relevant value anyway when it's all subjective.
For me it absolutely is. Far from perfect but it plays its strenghts really well.
Which one is it for you, out of curiosity.
Third acts of Endgame and IW:
Those films made me realize I don't need more superheroes.
I don't think TDK is the best Batman film either though. Not that it matters much since these poll results have no relevant value anyway when it's all subjective.
Its a trend here on these forums. Has been since 2008. Every time any remotely popular CBM is released, doesn't matter about the style, tone, whether its an origin movie, a sequel, the conclusion of a trilogy, the tenth movie in a franchise, a huge superhero ensemble etc, it gets pitted against TDK to see if it can topple it on the popularity poll.
Yup, and the ironic part is every time they do that, it reinforces the fact that The Dark Knight is still the greatest comic book movie of all time in a lot of peoples minds.Often by folks who - for one reason or another - don’t like the The Dark Knight, and the fact it’s still the gold standard.
Batman Begins is the better Batman movie. The Dark Knight is the better movie. Both are tremendous.
That’s the way I’ve always regarded them.
For the record, aside from parts of the final fight, Endgame has not aged well with me. I don't think it even deserves to be put against TDK or Batman Begins. It's a 3 hour film where nobody talks about anything but cap picking up Thors hammer and Tony dying. Seriously, I never see anybody talk about anything in Endgame other than the final fight. The movie being 3 hours, I feel, was just to make it seem more epic than it really was with stuff that wasn't that important (in my opinion). I like the scenes of Tony and his dad/family, but. I mean I still like the movie, dont get me wrong, but it's not even in the top 5 MCU movies
It's one of the films where you can strip away the first 2 hours and not miss much. Its one of the reasons I was surprised people were hailing it as a masterpiece. At first, it didn't bother me much but as time went on, and the more I thought about it I started to care about it less. I don't even have much of an urge to see it again.for me Endgame is the most disappointing movie in MCU.
It's one of the films where you can strip away the first 2 hours and not miss much. Its one of the reasons I was surprised people were hailing it as a masterpiece. At first, it didn't bother me much but as time went on, and the more I thought about it I started to care about it less. I don't even have much of an urge to see it again.
thought third act of Endgame is a drab looking mess.
imo third act of IW is way better in every way, you can see everything clearly, the fights are varied, etc.
It's a 3 hour film where nobody talks about anything but cap picking up Thors hammer and Tony dying. Seriously, I never see anybody talk about anything in Endgame other than the final fight.
I agree that TDK is superior to EG and will gladly say that it is the greatest CBM of all time. However, TDK also had a FAR easier task to accomplish. It only had to tell the stories of a tiny handful of characters, as opposed to wrapping up a 20 movie saga and giving two of the biggest characters in said saga satisfying conclusions. The fact that EG is even remotely watchable, let alone that its actually as good (I would argue great) as it is, is incredible.
They knew TDK was going to be successful. While Begins didn't kill it in the box office because of what happened with the series before it, it had very decent legs. Most importantly, it was an all time DVD seller. It made something like 210m on DVD. They knew people were going to be showing up for the sequel. That does not change that TDK paid off that anticipation, which was huge.Agree...and disagree. I agree that with everything EG had to juggle, it did a reasonably good job of being good.
I don't think TDK had a super easy task though, considering that BB wasn't a huge box office smash even by 2005 standards. There's a lot of people who saw TDK first, and it's not like B&R had been eons ago, the franchise was still very much up in the air if Nolan didn't stick the landing in TDK....
They knew TDK was going to be successful. While Begins didn't kill it in the box office because of what happened with the series before it, it had very decent legs. Most importantly, it was an all time DVD seller. It made something like 210m on DVD. They knew people were going to be showing up for the sequel. That does not change that TDK paid off that anticipation, which was huge.
It was definitely a lot of factors, that sadly being one of them. But it should always be noted that the hype for TDK was there even before that tragedy. Did it add something else to situation? No doubt. Might have taken it from a 8 or 9, to a 10.I always take exception to people saying Ledger's death had a lot to do with him getting the Oscar, there were rumblings of what he was doing almost every other month while filming, the first trailer just cemented that.
I can't say it didn't have something to do with the box office though, at least initially. It went well beyond expectations once people saw it and it gained legs, but I can't attribute that whole phenomenon solely to BB...
Agree...and disagree. I agree that with everything EG had to juggle, it did a reasonably good job of being good.
I don't think TDK had a super easy task though, considering that BB wasn't a huge box office smash even by 2005 standards. There's a lot of people who saw TDK first, and it's not like B&R had been eons ago, the franchise was still very much up in the air if Nolan didn't stick the landing in TDK....