The difference between Flight 93 & United 93.

Common principles of physics my friend. 10,000 ft. and at cruising speed it's damn near impossible to establish a connection, unless you have the brand new self-contained cellphone towers built into American Airlines that were established in 2003.

Now, if cellphones worked so great in 2001, then why did AA decide to spend all that money on self-contained cellphone towers?
 
HUMAN said:
Common principles of physics my friend. 10,000 ft. and at cruising speed it's damn near impossible to establish a connection, unless you have the brand new self-contained cellphone towers built into American Airlines that were established in 2003.

Now, if cellphones worked so great in 2001, then why did AA decide to spend all that money on self-contained cellphone towers?

So it is possible?
 
...to establish a CONNECTION

To sustain that connection is a different story.
 
theShape said:
Listen, I'm not saying I believe everything Loose Change has to offer it. Though much of it is, in fact, factual, it has several factual innaccuracies. But I KNOW something more went on that day. I wish I didn't think so, but after the smallest amount of research, it's obvious.

Loose Change is only the beginning.

I'm not trying to get into anything with you, though obviously are with me, this is just what I believe in. All I'm saying is open your eyes and ears to what people have to say, rather than mocking it tossing it away as if it's just some crackpot theory.

On the contrary, I have no desire to "get into anything" with you either.

Just as you are challenging my beliefs, I am with you as well.

I just don't think some internet doc should be the basis for a particular absolute belief.

It just seems easier that some hate-bent religious zealots concieved a plan to attack some buildings than the notion that the government placed explosives in a building and flew some remote planes into them, and detonated and destroyed them. And then covered it up without the conscious of just one person causing them to reveal the truth.
 
SolidSnakeMGS said:
It just seems easier that some hate-bent religious zealots concieved a plan to attack some buildings than the notion that the government placed explosives in a building and flew some remote planes into them, and detonated and destroyed them. And then covered it up without the conscious of just one person causing them to reveal the truth.

http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/news/20010430/northwoods.pdf

http://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=92662&page=1

Yeah, it sure is easier to believe that...
 
You swallowing this conspiracy theory crap and believing it so fully is absolutly no different than people who believe in the opposite. So shut up and stop trying to convert anyone.
 
Geo7877 said:
You swallowing this conspiracy theory crap and believing it so fully is absolutly no different than people who believe in the opposite. So shut up and stop trying to convert anyone.

Since when did official US Government documents and ABC news become 'conspiracy crap?'
 
lmao.

Human is like an Atheist trying to convert a Christian.

Or a Christian trying to convert an Athiest.
 
So, if I cite FOX News, will that be a little more 'official' for you? :rolleyes:
 
JLBats said:
Well, I'm actually NOT America. And I'm hardly supporting Bush here. His actions post-9/11 have been despicable and perfectly worthy of removing him from office, regardless of whether I believe he was behind 9/11.

I love how bush rigas an ellection and people just kinda accept yet clinton, who I think was americas best president since lincoln, shags an intern and he's hounded and people start demanding his impeachment.

In the words of Bill

You are free to do what we tell you, you are free to do what we tell you!
 
hippy fascist said:
I love how bush rigas an ellection and people just kinda accept yet clinton, who I think was americas best president since lincoln, shags an intern and he's hounded and people start demanding his impeachment.

In the words of Bill

You are free to do what we tell you, you are free to do what we tell you!

Apparently rigging an election is not as bad as having sex with someone. :confused:
 
okay so hold on...I thought they were the same movie...which one is Paul Greengrass?....flight 93 right? There are no conspiracies, I think people take comfort in thinking that their government "had a plan" or did something. The simple fact is that day, due to negligence and not responding to known intelligence, the government didnt know what hit them. The whole thing was a shambles...scary to think that people who run the U.S.A are capable of such atrocious error and incompetency...but there you go. The truth is more frightening than some whacked out conspiracy. The plane crashed ,it was not shot down. Jets werent sent to intercept as that would have taken too much planning...it was panic.

There is no "terror threat" it's all bull****, a reaction to bad american (and british) foreign policy....I hate to say it but I seriously doubt this would have happened had Clinton been in power. You can say what you like about him, but with the exception of South Africa, he really had his eye on foreign issues and the middle-east.......

I also don't think we'll see more 9/11 movies in the near future as the B.O has shown people don't want to pay to sit through two hours remembering one of the worst days in recent history...notyet. Looks like it really was "too soon!"
 
HUMAN said:
Americans thought that the Spanish blew up the Maine in the late 1890's.

Germans thought that the Sovients set fire to the Riechstag building when Hitler was in power.

Romans thought Christians set fire to Rome when Nero was in power.

False Flag operations are insanely popular, go read your history books.

Precisely. And the plans outlined in Operation Northwoods make 9/11 seem fishy.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
202,288
Messages
22,079,640
Members
45,880
Latest member
Heartbeat
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"