For your sake, I'll make a compromise: We'll divide it up by paragraph. Easier for both of us.
For the household, and again I stress that this is a greater cultural trend, I'm not accusing any specific parents of being abusing or anything, I think it's a communication issue. I have no problem with parents having rules and expectations of their kids. Kids are hard to deal with. What I have a problem with is kids not being listened to. Kids being made to feel that they're somehow less than adults. I mean, in terms of years they are, but I'm talking in terms of worth as a human being. It's not intentional. It's not malicious. Hell, we love kids in this country. But they're talked down to. They're talked at. The idea that you can have a meaningful conversation with a fourteen year old, or even an eighteen year old, in this country is considered odd. And because of that, because kids are expected to be seen and not heard, to do things "because I say so," I think in a way they actually lack guidance. As I said before, a guide is not a dictator. You're not going to learn anything from someone who remains slightly distant and lays down the law, you're either going to start simply following orders without ever thinking about them (which is unamerican), or start resenting authority in general (which is far too painfully American). In a way, kids are left largely to their own devices because of this. They're given orders and expected to follow them and otherwise expected to take care of themselves, without actually having any freedom to learn how to do so (I will get to the freedom bin in a minute, bare with me). Adults need to be a guides. They need to teach kids, not simply boss them. They need to take the time to understand kids and help the kids understand them, themselves, and the world. That's what kids crave. That's the thing they really need. Sometimes that involves setting down rules and consequences. But there needs to be as much communication as possible every step of the way. Otherwise, kids won't develop good listening skills, which is bad.
As for the freedom piece... and this is even more of a societal thing because most of the parents I know give their kids relatively free reign... kids need to be allowed to try and take care of themselves. Now, I know I mentioned kids taking care of themselves as being a bad thing in the last paragraph, so let me explain: What I mean is, yes, as I said earlier, keeps need guidance. But they don't need to be micromanaged. They don't need to have every aspect of their day decided for them. Sometimes they need a push. Sometimes they need to be allowed to choose for themselves. I honestly think the pushing aspect is most important when their youngest, if only to help them understand what their options are. As they get older, and fairly quickly, forcing them to do day to day things against their will (other than, you know, bathe) seems like a little much. I think the biggest offender here is schools, but I get to that later. basically, kids are often micromanaged. Society tries to herd them and limit their options, we tell them where to be when to be there what to do when they get there and give them few options, because we're afraid they will run riot. When in fact if they don't have anything to riot against, they'll be less inclined to.
I feel like I'm being vague. I'm sorry. Let me try to be more clear... okay, yeah. The freedom that I think is curtailed is the freedom to decide what to do with their time. They get very little of that. Society tries to fill their time with things they don't want to do to "keep them out of trouble." I think this is wrong and unnecessary. They do need some kind of structure. They do need academic environments and rules both there and in the household. But it does not need to be anywhere near as restricted as it is.
I never said it was a fallacy for children of any age to respect adults. What I said was a fallacy was expecting the respect to come from the children from nothing. Saying "if kids want respect, they need to show some respect to the people who work hard to take care of them." Well, yes, that is true. But kids have to learn respect, and they won't learn it if they never receive it. Respect has to come from the parents first because they already grasp the concept. Once trust and respect have been established, then yes it's largely the kid's fault if he's being a jackass for no reason, but I also feel quite certain that it's less likely if they actually feel like they get respect and that their opinions matter. As for talking to the kids... I don't buy that. A parent's job is to guide children into adulthood. They're not doing the kid any favors if they don't actually explain things to them. Yes, you're right, a four year old is incredibly difficult to talk to, and they're not going to understand everything, and in several areas a parent has to have the final say. But it still never hurts to listen to them. Honestly. Even if you don't change your mind, the fact that you listened to them and actually took their point of view, even if it's an underdeveloped point of view, into account, will in the long run be very good for them. A parent does buy food and clothes and whatnot, but that fact absolutely does not invalidate how their child thinks and feels. Taking that attitude creates a gap between the parent and child that makes forming a real connection kind of difficult.
I disagree 100%. Pulling out the "because I say so" card is a complete cop out. It doesn't solve anything.It doesn't help anyone. I'm even going to go so far to say that the parent doesn't have that right. Yes, a kid may be resentful that their parent doesn't want them to play a lot of video games. But honestly, wouldn't they be more resentful if they can't play video games and they're not given a good reason as to why? There's no reason for "because I say so." It alienates the kid from their parent. Talk about it. Actually try to understand each other. Communication, like respect (which is a part of communication) is a two way street. Show someone that you're willing to listen and that you want to understand their point of view and they'll be more willing to do the same to you. Kids will learn positive communication skills if those skills are used on them. Now, if the kid in question actually has a serious problem with video games, then you might need to have an intervention of sorts. But if it's less serious than that, there's nothing wrong with talking it out. As for teaching kids "life's tough, deal with it" I'm not convinced that it gets them ready for a job. If someone has something they really want to do and are motivated to do it, they're going to find out what they have to do to achieve that. It's human nature. Your argument makes the assumption that it's a kid's natural state to be disrespectful and disruptive and be unable to do what is asked of them. I don't buy that. Kids are a result of their upbringing.
All levels of school. And again, I disagree. Yeah, maybe an elementary school aged kid won't choose to take math and science and english. So what? What is the benefit of a base curriculum. Why do we need one? What's wrong with a kid only ever taking math and science classes from elementary school to high school? If they decide they want to become a physicist, then they'll be fine. Yeah, they'll have to write papers and whatnot, but first of all, MLA formatting is really easy to learn, and as for basic reading and writing skills, the fact is that reading and writing are so important in our society, the only way someone who was given the opportunity to learn how to read and write wouldn't is if they decided it wasn't worth their time. Which they wouldn't, because it's difficult to get by without the written word in this society. Kids should be allowed to focus on the things they have interests and skills in. Education should be designed to activate a child's potential, not mold the child to a predetermined idea of what they should be. As for links:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sudbury_model
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Sudbury_schools
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=csAiJgvajYo
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N7XNx5G0mPU&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FUl86pVLj4Q
Serious violent acts in well off middle class suburban schools are incredibly rare. They do get a lot more media coverage than ones in inner city schools, but they are much rarer.