The Incredible Hulk CGI Thread

hulk design

  • tv series

  • ang lee's

  • comics


Results are only viewable after voting.
So, are you saying that the new movie won't be mature?

Movies like spider man make huge bucks and pirates of the Caribbean because they are geared to kids. Hulk 2003 was actually widely accepted by adults and hated by the younger generation meaning mostly 25 and under. Statistically Hulk is not for kids anymore because all of us Hulk smash folks are grown up and want more than what we have gotten through our child hood which is what Marvel did at that time. The mistake they made was try to please both audiences by adding cheesy Dog fight and morphing father at the end. Those two scenes could have been replace with more Hulk time. Any of the people who actually love dramatic movies and more fleshed out movie enjoyed the hell out of Hulk 03 and read deeper into the human soul with it. It was more than an action movie attempt it was a good film. Spiderman is very kid friendly as u can see from the original trailer and the green goblin power ranger costume. Not that 2008 will be bad but by the trailer alone you can see the audience. They are desperate to sell something IN the movie and not THE movie as u can see with abomination being shown in the FIRST teaser. They have based the entire movie on THAT. Watch the Hulk 03 trailer and you'll see NO humor because it wasn't meant that way. The new Hulk movie is geared to be marketed as a franchise and not a good movie. batman begins and The original 1989 one were made as films and not franchises as was superman the movie. Those were excellant movies. The new Hulk will be "cool" but not a good film, I promise. I've been following what they were going for and rebooting from ang lee's automatically tells me what they aren't gonna have in it
 
The new Hulk won't be a good film? Can you tell the future? Are you a f**king psychic? Hell no. Btw, the 2003 Hulk not being aimed at the younger audience isn't why it isn't accepted. Seriously, none of what you said was true.
 
The new Hulk won't be a good film? Can you tell the future? Are you a f**king psychic? Hell no. Btw, the 2003 Hulk not being aimed at the younger audience isn't why it isn't accepted. Seriously, none of what you said was true.
Again these are all my opinions and to me they are truthful statements because I predeicted how spiderman 3, Batman forever and Robin, fantastic Four 1 and 2, Xmen 3, Blade 3, Hulk 2003, and Batman Begins were gonna be like by all their trailers alone and I have NEVER been wrong on those alone. NEVER been wrong so my truths come from my experience of perfect analyzing of Trailers, scripts, Cast, and what they are advertising their movies as. Films or movies???? two different things. Films are made by Artists, and movies are made by Business men. Some movies are great, but most are not. I study this stuff and actually take time with film and cinematography, fx, and ll the stuff that nees to be and need not be in a movie. The Matrix (film), The Matrix reloaded and Revolutions (Movies)... Films last a life time in your life, but Movies last those two hours and on to the next. Just watch what happens with this Hulk movie, watch!!!!
 
It's pretty easy to say you've made "predictions" they've all been right. Screw you because you're full of yourself. I'm putting you on ignore, you're too damn annoying for me to tolerate.
 
It's pretty easy to say you've made "predictions" they've all been right. Screw you because you're full of yourself. I'm putting you on ignore, you're too damn annoying for me to tolerate.

Do what you must, i can't allow another Human being to annoy me to that level, I'm too elevated for that and there is NO limit in one being FULL of themselves because that's the problem. People don't reflect on SELF enough and that is why they have the need to let emotions control anything that doesn't fit into their personal space. We are exchanging opinions and if My VIEWpoint does not sit well with you then u don't have to accept it into ur world, but by accepting it and then getting mad that YOU accepted it in then you frustrate no one but YOU. Fact doesn't really exist because everything could be a facade as u know it from what u saw or didn't see yesterday and every memory u ever had. I'm only stating my personal view as a seperate being to you and so you do you and let me do me. We can discuss but I am beyond the point of letting another's opinions drive me.

As for ignoring, if that's what you must do to ease your mind then do what you must. Some people are just not built to have an opposing force in their domain
 
The Joker_1000 said:
I'm talking about Savage Hulk, not Guilt Hulk.
Lol. You never made any distinctions between what Hulk you were talking about. Your point was that the Hulk has never been drawn as big or bigger than he was shown in the movie in the comics. Obviously you were wrong.
 
Hulk '03 (referring to them as Ang's Hulk or Norton's Hulk is the most ******ed thing) looked like a powerlifter..thick and powerful. The '08 Hulk looks more like a bodybuilder..leaner and meaner.
I happen to like both looks.
 
It's not ******ed, it's just nicknaming the different versions of the Hulk. As far as the 2003 Hulk is confirmed, he weighed too much, he should've weighed a little less. Three thousand lbs was a bit much.
 
It doesnt matter actually. You stated that the Hulk has never been drawn larger than 12-15 ft tall. You didnt stipulate that he had to be in his Savage Hulk persona, so any transformation would be ok to use as evidence that he was. Kirmit brought up Guilt Hulk which has been drawn to be larger than 15 ft in the comics. Again, you were mistaken.
 
No, I was not mistaken. To a person whose IQ is larger than that of a squirrel, you would know that it's pretty obvious that I was talking about the Savage Hulk the whole time, who is the most prominent Hulk featured in the comics.
 
Is it even possible to test the IQ of a squirrel? Thats a serious question, btw.

Why dont you read over your posts again and show me where you make it clear that youre talking about Savage Hulk. The post where you state that you were AFTER Kirmit offered evidence that you were wrong isnt valid.
 
Look, we were comparing the size of 2003's Hulk to the height of the Hulk in the comics. Why in the blue hell would we compare the Savage Hulk of the movie to another version who isn't the Savage Hulk in the comics?
 
Do what you must, i can't allow another Human being to annoy me to that level, I'm too elevated for that and there is NO limit in one being FULL of themselves because that's the problem. People don't reflect on SELF enough and that is why they have the need to let emotions control anything that doesn't fit into their personal space. We are exchanging opinions and if My VIEWpoint does not sit well with you then u don't have to accept it into ur world, but by accepting it and then getting mad that YOU accepted it in then you frustrate no one but YOU. Fact doesn't really exist because everything could be a facade as u know it from what u saw or didn't see yesterday and every memory u ever had. I'm only stating my personal view as a seperate being to you and so you do you and let me do me. We can discuss but I am beyond the point of letting another's opinions drive me.

As for ignoring, if that's what you must do to ease your mind then do what you must. Some people are just not built to have an opposing force in their domain

Hey...umm...Godman, uhhh...choo got sum more of dat elevation main? Choo wanna share a lil' bit of dat main?

Just kidding man. LOL. You're right about opinions and although I don't agree with yours, you still are entitled to it.
 
Look, we were comparing the size of 2003's Hulk to the height of the Hulk in the comics. Why in the blue hell would we compare the Savage Hulk of the movie to another version who isn't the Savage Hulk in the comics?

Why do you always resort to abusing your fellow fanboys...ur always first to lash out at the person behind the words instead of just sticking to the topic. Ya'll have had a misunderstanding and if you were wrong then you were wrong but if you feel you were right and they were wrong then u both agree to disagree unless one steps down and says they stand corrected. It's simple guys let's keep havin fun and not be brash to each other over characters that were created by other guys who ain't even here to really set things straight. until you meat the guy who has read EVERY SINGLE Hulk envisioned and seen Every Episode, movie or adaptation then all you have is opinions. If you slap me that's my experienced nobody can tell me how it felt or how much it hurt or not, MY EXPERIENCE. I LOVED Ang's Hulk and it is my top five comicbook (FILMS) of all time. Batman Begins, The Crow, TMNT live action, Hulk, Sin City and 300. I've actually met folks who LOVED Joel Schumacher stuff. Some people eat meow meows and some don't...YUK!!!! it is what it is
 
Hey...umm...Godman, uhhh...choo got sum more of dat elevation main? Choo wanna share a lil' bit of dat main?

Just kidding man. LOL. You're right about opinions and although I don't agree with yours, you still are entitled to it.

Thanks, it's all good, we just discussing another man's ideas anyway
 
Lol, Godman. Youve got a weird philosophic posting style. I like it. You are right though about Joker lashing out personally at others. It doesnt bother me that he says my intelligence is lower than that of a squirrel, since those buggers are cool as hell.
 
Godman, please...please...

Go back to SoHo.

In all seriousness, though, you may find that a handful of people are going to blatantly disagree with what you are saying. You are entitled to your opinion, but you need more backing in your film/movie argument for to hold any real water.

But I see where you are going, and it looks like the potential for a real, good quality debate is here.
 
Moving on....

The 2003 Hulk is starting to grow on me because of how amazing the CGI in the movie was. I found myself watching all of the Hulk scenes tonight and they were all so beautiful.
 
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"