The Jaimie Alexander/Lady Sif thread

Then you weren't making any sort of point. Moving on.

:whatever:

6IJptf7.jpg
 
Right back at ya. You don't have to be a part of the conversation.
 
I get the point of using Melissa McCarthy because she is very well known but I would have used someone younger like Rebel Wilson because that is a silly young woman dress. McCarthy is a 40 something year old mother now, even if she had Alexander's body type I don't think she would ever wear something like that. Now Rebel Wilson might actually wear something like that as a joke of course. lol Sorry for ruining your example!
 
Last edited:
I get the point of using Melissa McCarthy because she is very well known but I would have used someone younger like Rebel Wilson because that is a silly young woman dress. McCarthy is a 40 something year old mother now, even if she had Alexander's body type I don't she would ever wear something like that. Now Rebel Wilson might actually wear something like that as a joke of course. lol Sorry for ruining your example!

Hahaha, no worries!
 
I get the point of using Melissa McCarthy because she is very well known but I would have used someone younger like Rebel Wilson because that is a silly young woman dress. McCarthy is a 40 something year old mother now, even if she had Alexander's body type I don't think she would ever wear something like that. Now Rebel Wilson might actually wear something like that as a joke of course. lol Sorry for ruining your example!


Rebel would do that actually. Ironically I have no doubt she would probably be praised for it.
 
I'm actually shocked she wasn't arrested. lol
In the side pictures, you can clearly see that she is not wearing any underwear and you can see her crotch. I would post the picture, but as Vartha said, it would be a banning type of picture. Which begs the question, if it's appropriate attire, why wouldn't we be allowed to post the uncensored pictures?

For the record, I'm not a prude (far from it if you actually knew me personally). But, there is a time and a place for expression. Our culture is overly sexualized and overly violent (as others pointed out). Less of both would be better.

But we all know, as long as the woman is hot, then she can wear whatever she wants. If it was this actress:

melissa-mccarthy-63rd-primetime-emmy-awards-nominees-02.jpg



Wearing Jaimie's dress, we would probably see comments like "Ew, gross" and "Put on some clothes."
 
Really? You can see her crotch and ass crack. It's too much.


How many of you defended Paris Hilton and Britney Spears when their crotches were photographed getting out of a car? Exactly. This isn't about defending Jaimie's dress, you wouldn't care if she showed up naked. And give me a break about this whole "women are catty and judgemental" business, we know that only some women are allowed to wear dresses like that. If someone who you didn't find attractive was wearing it, I bet this discussion would be totally different.
Here is the thing. I have no trouble with nudity. She doesn't look "trashy" to me nor is she drunk in public falling over, incapable of understanding her surroundings. Any comparisons to Paris Hilton or Britney Spears is ridiculous. The only way you are seeing anything is odd camera angles and the like.

This entire argument is ridiculous.
 
Ok, guys and girls, I did finally see the one image that adds validity to the complaints of the dress being too much. Before I just saw the untouched version of the imaged that was blurred, and didn't know what the fuss was about, since you still didn't see anything. But this image...

[YT]6nSKkwzwdW4[/YT]
 
Here is the thing. I have no trouble with nudity. She doesn't look "trashy" to me nor is she drunk in public falling over, incapable of understanding her surroundings. Any comparisons to Paris Hilton or Britney Spears is ridiculous. The only way you are seeing anything is odd camera angles and the like.

This entire argument is ridiculous.

Actually, it's not. Nudity is nudity. At least the other two didn't mean to flash the camera. Jaimie had to know that her crotch would be photographed. That's pretty lame.
 
Here is the thing. I have no trouble with nudity. She doesn't look "trashy" to me nor is she drunk in public falling over, incapable of understanding her surroundings. Any comparisons to Paris Hilton or Britney Spears is ridiculous. The only way you are seeing anything is odd camera angles and the like.

This entire argument is ridiculous.

Indeed.
 
Actually, it's not. Nudity is nudity. At least the other two didn't mean to flash the camera. Jaimie had to know that her crotch would be photographed. That's pretty lame.
When you are too hammered to get in and out of your car, that is a problem. If as some angles people looking real close can see your "naughty" bits, I ask if they have a problem, why are they looking so damn close.

You are right though, nudity is nudity and I have no problem with it.
 
Well public nudity is still illegal.
Well then we better round up every woman at a premiere who ever worn anything a little too sheer or had a a slip. :funny:

Do you understand what you are saying?
 
Well then we better round up every woman at a premiere who ever worn anything a little too sheer or had a a slip. :funny:

Do you understand what you are saying?

Oh my god, that's not a slip. She didn't wear underwear and her crotch can clearly be seen numerous times. This was on purpose. For shame.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"