The Justice System of America..

OverMyHead

Civilian
Joined
Nov 23, 2006
Messages
920
Reaction score
0
Points
11
Is messed up... :csad:

ATLANTA, Georgia
(AP) --
A judge said Wednesday he'll rule by next week on the appeal of a man sentenced to 10 years in prison for having consensual oral sex with a 15-year-old girl when he was 17.

A lawyer for Genarlow Wilson, now 21, asked the appellate judge to throw out the aggravated child molestation sentence on the grounds it is grossly disproportionate to the crime.

Defense attorney B.J. Bernstein noted that state lawmakers passed a law to close the loophole that led to Wilson's sentence.

But prosecutor Paula Smith argued that the new law cannot be applied retroactively.

"The General Assembly did not make it retroactive," Smith said. "They had the prerogative to do so; they did not." She argued that Wilson should have to serve out the widely criticized mandatory term.

Wilson, clad in a white prison uniform, watched as his legal team again tried to free him while they pursue a claim that his constitutional rights are being violated. Monroe County Superior Court Judge Thomas Wilson said he expects to issue a decision on the appeal by noon Monday.

Genarlow Wilson's sentence has been denounced even by members of the jury that convicted him and the author of the 1995 law that put him behind bars.

"The law was designed to protect kids against really, really bad people doing very bad things," said the sponsor, former state Rep. Matt Towery, a Republican. "It was never intended to put kids in jail for oral sex."

In 2003, Wilson was an honors student, standout athlete and homecoming king preparing for his SATs with an eye toward college. At a New Year's Eve party involving alcohol, marijuana and sex, someone videotaped the girl performing oral sex on Wilson.

The tape also shows Wilson and other male partygoers having sexual intercourse with a 17-year-old girl. Prosecutors sought a rape conviction against him, arguing that the 17-year-old was semiconscious and not capable of consent. But a jury that watched the tape disagreed.

Bernstein compared the case to the recent rape case involving Duke University lacrosse players, saying prosecutors in both cases overreached.

Somehow, I believe, this has something to do with Political Correctness...

or just plain mean racism. :o
 
It's going to be a long long LONG time.

You should just take morphine and call it a day.
 
I like these forums because I can abbreviate the title of this thread, "The Justice System of America", as the JSA and most of you nerds will know exactly what I mean.
 
Wait... they were both under 18? Doesn't that mean she's doing time for having sex with a minor, as well?
 
It's about time they started jailing kids for getting oral sex!
 
I like these forums because I can abbreviate the title of this thread, "The Justice System of America", as the JSA and most of you nerds will know exactly what I mean.

LOL "most of you nerds"
 
Thought this was another homework thread.
 
This is serious bull****. The guy should be getting no time instead of 10 years hard time. Serious bull****.

Of course it's race related. How the hell did he get 10 years? Nobody gets 10 years for that.

And the prosecutor going for a rape charge? come on. This is race related, and as far as I'm concerned the only crimes committed were committed by the prosecutor and judge.
 
Who hires a defense attorney named B.J. for an oral sex trial??? Seriously!
 
isn't it simply the fact that it was videotaped, the main reason for the outrage and charges brought against him...what about the person who videotaped it? Seems like they'd be in just as much trouble. This is a very odd case. But not the first of its kind.
 
They took deals. They weren't going to get away with that they did.
 
Wait... they were both under 18? Doesn't that mean she's doing time for having sex with a minor, as well?


I most state you have to be over 18 to be charged with satutory rape.
 
again...it was videotaped...this isn't exactly hearsay...the tape was passed around, both or all accused parties were all underage (although in southern states, 17 is the same as 18) and the act itself was, in a way made public, when an 18year old senior in highschool is dating someone who is 16 or under...everything is assumed...its assumed that niether are engaging in any sexual activity...its also assumed they probably are, but how many people out there stupidly video tape it?...as much as I'd like to say I'm outraged by the ten year sentence (which I am...that is ridiculous, they've ruined his life) I'm also gonna have to say it was pretty foolish...and our justice system doesn't hand people slaps on the wrists in certain situations. The race issue...don't rule it out...the fact that it was videotaped...meant that if they didn't have one case to prosecute...they probably had another angle...it clearly says they tried several different ways to bring this person down, unfortunately they succeeded...and by that, I mean the length of his sentence. Ever hear about the kid who robbed someone, only got two dollars, was put on probation...failed his drug test (traces of THC were found) and then they gave him LIFE in prison...thats just as messed up as this.
 
So this poor kid, who was an honors student, get's 10 years in prison for a consesual *******, the jury said they made a mistake and just about everyone feels the same but tough *******, you gotta stay there? Maybe he should claim he feels sick and stop eating like another jailbird we know of, maybe they'll let him go home to?
 
This is what aggravates me about the people who say why should we care about Paris Hilton, because travesties like this happen all the time, but she has notoriety and money so lets let the little biotch go home.
 
This is serious bull****. The guy should be getting no time instead of 10 years hard time. Serious bull****.

Of course it's race related. How the hell did he get 10 years? Nobody gets 10 years for that.

And the prosecutor going for a rape charge? come on. This is race related, and as far as I'm concerned the only crimes committed were committed by the prosecutor and judge.

So who's discriminating against whom? This is messed up but then it hits another level when people start saying racism when there's nothing mentioned about race in any way.

Can't there be stupid judicial rulings that have nothing to do with race?
 
If you're posting an article, specially verbatim like that, it's usually good manners to cite your source...
 
I just read this in a different article

Had Wilson engaged in regular sexual intercourse with the 15-year-old, the act would’ve fallen under Georgia’s "Romeo and Juliet" exception. But under the law in 2003, oral sex between teens constituted aggravated child molestation and carried a mandatory sentence.


That's just messed up. This isn't a race thing, this is a ****ed up judicial system and overzealous stupid prosecutors.

http://eurweb.com/story/eur34159.cfm


And how can the ****ing jurors say "I know in my heart this person did not commit a crime" and then convict him. That's just stupidity.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"