• Super Maintenance

    Xenforo Cloud upgraded our forum to XenForo version 2.3.4. This update has created styling issues to our current templates.

    Starting January 9th, site maintenance is ongoing until further notice, but please report any other issues you may experience so we can look into.

    We apologize for the inconvenience.

Faith in humanity...waning....

Mr Sparkle said:
never! why don't you lay of the coffee!? stop telling me what to do!!!:cmad::cmad::cmad::cmad::cmad::cmad:


*gets out Taiwarriorz paddle*


Thats it, get over here.
 
I wonder what percentage of current-day Americans, had they lived in Nazi Germany, would've said, "Well, yeah, I don't necessarily agree with some of our stringent laws here, but for now, the law very clearly states that if someone is hiding Jews in their attic, it's my duty to turn them in. That's the law, so, I'm calling the Gestapo.

Huge percentage I suspect :o
 
Wilhelm-Scream said:
I wonder what percentage of current-day Americans, had they lived in Nazi Germany, would've said, "Well, yeah, I don't necessarily agree with some of our stringent laws here, but for now, the law very clearly states that if someone is hiding Jews in their attic, it's my duty to turn them in. That's the law, so, I'm calling the Gestapo.

Huge percentage I suspect :o


Sadly.
 
mightiest_mortal said:
(im glad its staying civil too :) yay)

Even in Changing the laws. Say the law was changed so it was legal for people who were 15 to have sex. thats ok. But Then 14 year olds are only a year younger so that wouldnt be so bad. Thatd be ok surely? So we change the law so you can have sex with 14 year olds. thats ok. but 13 year olds, theyre ONLY a year younger, thats hardly much? that should be ok surely? so we make having sex with 13 year olds legal.
I do think that he was punished harshly, but i do think the courts must have had reason to feel that they had to do so.
Maybe a regulation of the laws is needed.. could even make it more like the Canadians close age peer group aproach... but the change needs to be done at the right time for the right reasons rather than just letting people slip through who are breaking current laws.
nono, you misunderstand, no one is saying that the age of consent should be lowered to 15, or 14, or wherever. There's such a thing as a grace period most states have to avoid the ridiculous situation this article describes: the age of consent for anyone older, in their 20s or 30s and above, is 18, 17 in some states.

Most states, however, (I have been told. if they haven't, they should) give a grace period, usually of two years. So that while a 32 year old can date an 18 year old but not a 16 year old, an 18 year old is free to date a 16 year old, a 17 year old is free to date a 15 year old or a 19 year old. Despite any general concerns about when someone should start having sex, in terms of legislating the matter, does ANYONE have a problem with this set up?
 
That sentence is an atrocity. The system has become the offender and the convicted has become the victim.

Many Americans have such patriotic pride. Were Americans and were so much better than the rest of the world, and our values our better. We believe in truth, justice, and the American way.

Our government victimizes it's people. Just a few years ago we sent gays to prison. Rescently muslims were arrested on an airplane because they said Saddam was doing a good job running Iraq and Bush is doing a horrible job. They were arrested, accused of terrorism, and are now on a no fly list. We allow millions of people to suffer, by not funding embryonic stem cell research, and why? for religous reasons. Our government expects people to die for a religous belief.

On torturing our own people? If you stop a person from eating, and it causes them to die, then you are killing them. If you stop a person from treating their illness with medical marijuna, and it causes them extreme agony, then you are torturing them.

In America, we execute people, torture people, oppress people, and this sentence against that boy is just another example of the government committing an atrocity in the spirit of false justice.
 
Spider-Bite said:
That sentence is an atrocity. The system has become the offender and the convicted has become the victim.

Many Americans have such patriotic pride. Were Americans and were so much better than the rest of the world, and our values our better. We believe in truth, justice, and the American way.

Our government victimizes it's people. Just a few years ago we sent gays to prison. Rescently muslims were arrested on an airplane because they said Saddam was doing a good job running Iraq and Bush is doing a horrible job. They were arrested, accused of terrorism, and are now on a no fly list. We allow millions of people to suffer, by not funding embryonic stem cell research, and why? for religous reasons. Our government expects people to die for a religous belief.

On torturing our own people? If you stop a person from eating, and it causes them to die, then you are killing them. If you stop a person from treating their illness with medical marijuna, and it causes them extreme agony, then you are torturing them.

In America, we execute people, torture people, oppress people, and this sentence against that boy is just another example of the government committing an atrocity in the spirit of false justice.


*patriotic music swell*
 
Elijya said:
Most states, however, (I have been told. if they haven't, they should) give a grace period, usually of two years. So that while a 32 year old can date an 18 year old but not a 16 year old, an 18 year old is free to date a 16 year old, a 17 year old is free to date a 15 year old or a 19 year old. Despite any general concerns about when someone should start having sex, in terms of legislating the matter, does ANYONE have a problem with this set up?

of course not. it makes prefect sense.
it's just people are so afraid of sex that they'd rather believe that their daughter was a "victim" than to think of her as a willing participant.
"he took advantage of her" while it could've been her that initiated the sexual contact.
 
I fully suspect this would not have appeared in court were it not for the girls parents, but no info is giving so that's just speculation
 
Wilhelm-Scream said:
I wonder what percentage of current-day Americans, had they lived in Nazi Germany, would've said, "Well, yeah, I don't necessarily agree with some of our stringent laws here, but for now, the law very clearly states that if someone is hiding Jews in their attic, it's my duty to turn them in. That's the law, so, I'm calling the Gestapo.

Huge percentage I suspect :o

rofl. Godwin would be proud.

Elijya said:
Despite any general concerns about when someone should start having sex, in terms of legislating the matter, does ANYONE have a problem with this set up?

nope no problems. It all just needs to be set in stone exactly what the grace period is and for what years it does/doesnt apply. (tho forgive me if it actually is.. im not up to date on my American laws... in England, if you get a 14 year old pregnant you get a free house and benefits... yay)

Elijya said:
I fully suspect this would not have appeared in court were it not for the girls parents, but no info is giving so that's just speculation
How did they even know? what was the evidence? did he make a video or something? lol
 
Mr Sparkle said:
of course not. it makes prefect sense.
it's just people are so afraid of sex that they'd rather believe that their daughter was a "victim" than to think of her as a willing participant.
"he took advantage of her" while it could've been her that initiated the sexual contact.
That's why I love that it was oral sex.
This isn't like where the dude is really inflicting himself on someone and the girl didn't realize what she had gotten herself into.
He was probably just sitting there while she went at it, with gusto.....and, performing an act, the nature of which ensures that she intended to bring him great physical/sexual pleasure while receiving very little if any physical pleasure herself.
 
the problem is these laws are state by state, not national
 
Here in Georgia, we hate horny high-schoolers, Harry Potter and evolution. :cmad:
 
Wilhelm-Scream said:
I wonder what percentage of current-day Americans, had they lived in Nazi Germany, would've said, "Well, yeah, I don't necessarily agree with some of our stringent laws here, but for now, the law very clearly states that if someone is hiding Jews in their attic, it's my duty to turn them in. That's the law, so, I'm calling the Gestapo.

Huge percentage I suspect :o
Hey, why don't we start following all the laws to their letter. Especially the ones we've forgotten...

- Spitting in the streets is punishable with 5 nights in jail
- Defacing ones property requries you repay them with indentured servitude for a year(slavery).
- Jay walking on Sunday is punishable by actually hobbling the individual guilty of the crime.


There are laws in my state that demands that her family give him a dowry, and provide 20 acres of land as they are now officially married. And since they are officially married, if anything she said was used as testimony to convict him then the case should be thrown out because a wife cannot testify against her husband. :o
 
Angry Sentinel said:
Hey, why don't we start following all the laws to their letter. Especially the ones we've forgotten...

- Spitting in the streets is punishable with 5 nights in jail
- Defacing ones property requries you repay them with indentured servitude for a year(slavery).
- Jay walking on Sunday is punishable by actually hobbling the individual guilty of the crime.


There are laws in my state that demands that her family give him a dowry, and provide 20 acres of land as they are now officially married. And since they are officially married, if anything she said was used as testimony to convict him then the case should be thrown out because a wife cannot testify against her husband. :o
hooray
 
Gotendbz-2 said:
That was mean! :cmad:

I was just saying we can't do anything about it.
well, come on man, your comment was a little rude. I mean, you can walk into ANY thread and just post "who cares?"

My coment was to point that you started a thread on a personal matter for you, and it was your expectation that people would care and be sympathetic. How would you have felt about a person who came in there and just said "who cares?" You would have thought they were pretty rude, right?
 
mightiest_mortal said:
How did they even know? what was the evidence? did he make a video or something? lol
I have no idea, it's just speculation. And since this case involves minors it's doubtful any specific details would be available
 
Angry Sentinel said:
- Defacing ones property requries you repay them with indentured servitude for a year(slavery).

i smell a seinfeld episode in there somewhere. nevermind, i just shat myself.
 
Elijya said:
well, come on man, your comment was a little rude. I mean, you can walk into ANY thread and just post "who cares?"

My coment was to point that you started a thread on a personal matter for you, and it was your expectation that people would care and be sympathetic. How would you have felt about a person who came in there and just said "who cares?" You would have thought they were pretty rude, right?

Sorry. I'm just kind of mad right now.
 
15 with 17 is nothing. I knew about 14 with 19. I know that's kind of big, but compared to 15 with 17.... well yeah
They might as well arrest all 12 year olds because the last time I talked to my cousin (he's 12) I found out the boy had sex. Talk about a shocker for me. :(
 
Pretty rediculous, but there are bigger issues out there to worry about than 15 yr olds getting their rocks off
 
NyteWing said:
Pretty rediculous, but there are bigger issues out there to worry about than 15 yr olds getting their rocks off
There's always bigger issues when you're the one that got caught. Before I ever got my first speeding ticket, I was all gung ho about the law. As soon as that first cop pulled me over my mindset has been, "they could be out catching rapists and muggers isntead of pulling me over for this."
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"