The Amazing Spider-Man The Official ASM THEATRICAL TRAILER Thread!

[AbsractPo3tic]

We jump down your throat because you were in full approval but now, just 3 months later, it was underwhelming. The very thing you jump all over people for in regards to Raimi's films. It's hypocritical dude. Stop trying to play victim when you do stuff like this allllllll the time.

In defense of him, because he seems like a good dude and knows a lot about Spidey, and I'm definitely not trying to start anything cause internet beef seems ridiculous to me, but he's definitely entitled to his opinion, one way or another. He maned up, apologized for what people called him on and as men, I think we all know how hard that is to do lol, especially to other guys.

 

[Spiderman6592]

He is entitled to his opinion, but he should be expected to be bashed when he does the same thing from the other side. I like SMH12, he is a good dude, and loves the character, but that doesn't make this any less hypocritical.

 

[craigdbfan]

And your not hypocritical? LMFAO, you of all people? You're probably the most stubborn person I've talked to in the 5 years I've been here. I don't have to abide by YOUR rules just to make you happy, and I won't.

This. Glad you said it.

Did the same thing with me when I just said that I didn't find the CGI to be all that great in the last part of the teaser. I even mentioned how much I really liked the Parker scenes in the trailer. One little comment and he jumped at our necks.

Trey_Parker disagreed with me but responded civilly while this guy just resorts to personal attacks.

I like how he tries implying you're creating rules when you've done no such thing and a page earlier says how "no one should mention the Raimi series at all" to which I responded that it's only natural that the past franchise on the character to be brought up. He then goes on to call me a brute.

 

[Spider-ManHero12]

In defense of him, because he seems like a good dude and knows a lot about Spidey, and I'm definitely not trying to start anything cause internet beef seems ridiculous to me, but he's definitely entitled to his opinion, one way or another. He maned up, apologized for what people called him on and as men, I think we all know how hard that is to do lol, especially to other guys.

I've apologized way too many times overall. Tbh, it goes through one ear and out the other.

 

[Spider-ManHero12]

And not to mention it happens more often when I apologize. It's unfortunate.

 

[UltimateWebhead]

How do you know that's what it's supposed to be? Did you do the cinematography for that 1.5 second shot?


And funny, that's never what I thought. It was a 1.5 second shot. The only reason people try to point it out as a POV shot is because TASM is utilizing POV and it's the only thing people have to cling onto and say, "HEY LOOK RAIMI DID IT TOO!"

No. He didn't.

It's a first person shot dude. No matter how YOU want to disguise it as not being one...sorry, but it's POV. I don't have to film something to be able to use reasoning and undertanding to know what it is.

It honestly doesn't matter if the shot was 1.5 secs, 0.2 secs, or two minutes long; a POV shot is a POV shot. Sorry but this is a silly argument.

I am not 'clinging' on to anything. I could care less about whether or not Raimi used POV before Webb or vice versa. It sounds like you are the one clinging to an argument for no reason and I don't understand why.

Again, I raise the question, if it wasn't a POV shot, what was it?

 

[Ajendo]

I can't speak on everything you said cause I wasn't here but I do agree with the bolded, bro. A good movie is a good movie and although From Russia With Love was made in the 60s, I can still watch it today and know I'm watching a very good flick. I sat down with my girl and watched Die Hard and she got so into it she wanted to see the other two and they still stand up to this day.

Precisely! A good movie is indeed a good movie. Both aforementioned films are more than 20 years old, hell FRWL is almost 50 years old but both are amazing cinematic products irrespective of the year they came out because the collaborative effort that went into making these films into something special, enjoyable and something that can be revisited at any time is something that not all movie makers have the ability to do and in this case and I'll speak for myself here, as whole movies, Raimi's spider-man movies are unwatchable.

 

[Spider-ManHero12]

This. Glad you said it.

Did the same thing with me when I just said that I didn't find the CGI to be all that great in the last part of the teaser. I even mentioned how much I really liked the Parker scenes in the trailer. One little comment and he jumped at our necks.

Trey_Parker disagreed with me but responded civilly while this guy just resorts to personal attacks.

I like how he tries implying you're creating rules when you've done no such thing and a page earlier says how "no one should mention the Raimi series at all" to which I responded that it's only natural that the past franchise on the character to be brought up. He then goes on to call me a brute.

Agreed. People have to start loooking at themselves for once.

 

[Troy_Parker]

And your not hypocriticla? LMFAO, you of all people? You're probably the most stubborn person I've talked to in the 55 years I've been here. I don't have to abide by YOUR rules just to make you happy, and I won't.

And your not hypocriticla? LMFAO, you of all people? You're probably the most stubborn person I've talked to in the 55 years I've been here. I don't have to abide by YOUR rules just to make you happy, and I won't.

And your not hypocriticla? LMFAO, you of all people? You're probably the most stubborn person I've talked to in the 55 years I've been here. I don't have to abide by YOUR rules just to make you happy, and I won't.

And your not hypocriticla? LMFAO, you of all people? You're probably the most stubborn person I've talked to in the 55 years I've been here. I don't have to abide by YOUR rules just to make you happy, and I won't.

And your not hypocriticla? LMFAO, you of all people? You're probably the most stubborn person I've talked to in the 55 years I've been here. I don't have to abide by YOUR rules just to make you happy, and I won't.

 

[Oscorp]

LMAO!!! Troy_Parker I must say that I love your posts sometimes xD

 

[UltimateWebhead]

Epic.

 

[Eggyman]

/meltdown

 

[ITheSymbioteI]

I've been over this. That is not a first person shot. You can't see any of the subject's body, nor does the camera move like a person. I've seen countless people try and argue this, but it's a complete farce. I love Raimi's final swings, but let's stop crediting for something he never did.

Sorry, but you don't know much about shots if you think that is a case.

Trust me on this one: That IS a POV shot. Is it as experiential as ASMs POV? No.

But it is named a POV shot when you are filming/editing. Again, it was only for like a second, and is nothing like the POV shot for ASM. Honestly, comparing the two is just ****ing stupid. In SM1, it is just a quick cut to keep with the speed of swinging, and keep the shots refreshing. In ASM, the point is entirely different. First its not just a quick cut, and second its meant to make you feel like Spidey. Some people might think the SM1 shot makes you feel like Spidey too, but again, thats just a very short cut. No one really compares a medium shot to an entire scene that is shot at medium distance.

That said, once again, that shot IS POV.

Many times, we see a person looking at something and the cut to show what it is suggests that it is POV. I will repeat myself, the body is almost never shown in the shots. But it is still POV.

One is more detailed than the other, that is the difference. Like I said, comparing the two is just dumb imo. One is just a shot, the other is a feature. The essence of your argument is right, but you are arguing about the wrong thing.

 

[UltimateWebhead]

Sorry, but you don't know much about shots if you think that is a case.

Trust me on this one: That IS a POV shot. Is it as experiential as ASMs POV? No.

But it is named a POV shot when you are filming/editing. Again, it was only for like a second, and is nothing like the POV shot for ASM. Honestly, comparing the two is just ****ing stupid. In SM1, that shot is just to show the swooping speed, not to really make you feel like Spidey in ASM.

That said, once again, that shot IS POV.

Many times, we see a person looking at something and the cut to show what it is suggests that it is POV. I will repeat myself, the body is almost never shown in the shots. But it is still POV.

One is more detailed than the other, that is the difference. Like I said, comparing the two is just dumb imo. One is just a shot, the other is a feature. The essence of your argument is right, but you are arguing about the wrong thing.

 

[Spider-ManHero12]

Why did you edit my post, LOL?

 

[Oscorp]

He didn't edit anything other than expanding the 55

 

[Spider-ManHero12]

I didn't say 55 though, lol. Well, I don't think I did. I said 5.

 

[Troy_Parker]

Epic.

LMAO!!! Troy_Parker I must say that I love your posts sometimes xD

/meltdown

Why did you edit my post, LOL?

I just made the "55" bigger... you actually said 55 years. lol

 

[Spider-ManHero12]

Oh. I meant 5 years.

 

[Troy_Parker]

I knew that. Just thought I'd lighten the mood. :P

Anyways, when do you guys think we'll be seeing those banners that RIM mentioned...?

 

[Eggyman]

I knew that. Just thought I'd lighten the mood. :P

Anyways, when do you guys think we'll be seeing those banners that RIM mentioned...?

Maybe midweek. Maybe later. Possibly.

 

[Spider-ManHero12]

Everybody is so quiet, lol.

 

[PSYLENTGuardian]

This has got to be the funniest post in all Superhero Hype history.

 

[Spider-ManHero12]

I knew that. Just thought I'd lighten the mood. :P

Anyways, when do you guys think we'll be seeing those banners that RIM mentioned...?

I'd say by the middle of the month.

 

[PSYLENTGuardian]

The expo is in two days, right? We should hear some reports from Tuesday to Thursday and maybe we'll finally get what we want after that.

RIM will be there, right?