Why in the world is Nolan being bashed on a thread about GL? What, because the first couple reviews are bad? So?
Listen, Some people (myself included) were Nolan fans BEFORE Batman Begins, so some people are partial to the man beyond capes and cowls. That being said, there's no question Batman has a richer history as a character than almost anyone in DC's lineup, or Marvel's for that matter, which is why, not coincidentally, he also has the best video game based on a superhero, best cartoon series, & for it's time, one of the best television shows.
There's a reason it took GL this long to get off the ground, and it isn't just about technology. It's because it's a lot easier to screw up than Batman or Spiderman. There's a reason certain superheroes are more popular than other ones, it has to do with their source material, something Nolan has nothing to do with.
It's not even a question that Batman has probably enjoyed the greatest amount of classic stories, with villains as iconic as he is himself, because he's had the fortune of so many of the best writers/artists doing their best work on his character. Nolan just tapped into another well of inspiration, but it's all there in the books to begin with. GL is what we need to be focusing on, because no matter who handled it, there's a chance it might not have worked, not everything is destined for massive success, regardless of how much you love it personally...