Well to be honest he's only really had three great films: GoldenEye, The Mask of Zorro and Casino Royale. Just about everything else he's done has been mediocre at best. I thought he was the right director for Green Lantern, but maybe he wasn't after all.
The good thing for Marvel here is they can see what bad things people will be saying about Green Lantern & if Captain America has anything bad similar in it they can fix it with time left
Brazilian site Omelete, partners with collider, published their early review. They said the movie is in the vains of Thor and Incredible Hulk. It is just too formulaic and offers nothing new except entertainment. Reynolds is quite good, not as good as Downey Jr or Fassbender/McAvoy, and the Lantern mythology is nice and really well done. A feast for the fans and so is the after credits scene. Also, Strong and Sarsgaard are good as the villains and Parallax works fine in 3d. The hero story isnt as compelling as other comic book movies like Spider-man 2.
3 out of 5, basically.
http://www.omelete.com.br/lanterna-verde/
Lots of people were complaining about Singer's control over Superman Returns, and that the studio should have pushed him for more action and less melodrama.
Lots of people were complaining about Singer's control over Superman Returns, and that the studio should have pushed him for more action and less melodrama.
superman returns did'nt get this bad of reviews tho since it has 76% at RT
As said before, I think this is like a Hangover II scenario. Seriously. Critics hated that film. I have yet to hear from one person who hated it, maybe didn't like it as much as it's predecessor but still found it entertaining. We're just three weeks after X-Men:First Class.
I loved the first movie, thought it was easily one of the best comedies ive ever seen and I didnt like hangover 2 at all.As said before, I think this is like a Hangover II scenario. Seriously. Critics hated that film. I have yet to hear from one person who hated it, maybe didn't like it as much as it's predecessor but still found it entertaining. We're just three weeks after X-Men:First Class.
Well, Bryan Singer's Superman Returns still remains a mediocre movie. Doesn't mean you can't give a writer/director any freedom anymore, and have to make a (comic book) editor-driven pic.
I agree with this
Its ironic you mentioned Fassbender because he was rumored to be one of the many actors who auditioned for the role of Hal Jordan/Green Lantern

Campbell has always been a hit and miss director. For every Goldeneye and Casino Royale, there's a Vertical Limit and Legend of Zorro.
They are sequels to movies that were loved by audiences. This is not.Pirates 3
Pirates 4
Transformers 2
All slammed by critics and went on to make a fortune
Those movies were an action feast though, larger than life. I dont think GL is in those vains. It seems like a smaller movie. WB was too formulaic with it, i guess, instead of going all out.Pirates 3
Pirates 4
Transformers 2
All slammed by critics and went on to make a fortune
Pirates 3
Pirates 4
Transformers 2
All slammed by critics and went on to make a fortune
Every summer critics pick one film to trash even if it's just mediocre, seriously hope that's the case here and that X-Men: First Class had something to do with it. Not a Marvel over DC thing just... hoping critics going from 'This is the next Dark Knight!' to a typical superhero film effected their decision. The clips didn't look that bad, rather entertaining: this wasn't the case with Wolverine or Last Stand. Like judging a sequel basically. Critics hated Hangover II, I loved it more than the first because it was darker and the stakes were higher even if it was "more of the same."
. I'm sure this movie won't be super close to that bad...but still.SR is easily one of the worst comic book movies i`ve ever seen on the vains of SIV and B&R.
Green Lantern is already better than that just by watching the 1 min online clips.