XtremelyBaneful
xoxxxoooxo
- Joined
- May 11, 2012
- Messages
- 15,259
- Reaction score
- 1,132
- Points
- 103
That's true. Some developers are better at remastering games than others; there was discussion about Rockstar's blunder with the Ps2 GTA series remastered game in this thread and how that went for them.When you compare to remastered games it really matters how well those remasters were made, as all remasters certainly aren't equal. Both those faces are much more natural than the original version (and I've only seen the better PS4 Pro version of the game), which is the one we should be comparing to if we are looking at the performance gap between the PS4 and the PS5.
Also, if I'm understanding you correctly when you say you've only seen the Ps4 pro version and that's the version we should compare in performance gaps between the Ps4 and 5, then I agree with that too. The pro consoles are just incremental improvements on the original releases, and the successor should blow the pro consoles out of the water as well which I think they did.
Really? Spider-Man 2 could run at 60fps on Ps5? That is impressive, then. I didn't know that.Furthermore, the PS5 can render at double the frame rate, which alone means a huge jump in power.
The fact that Ps5 can run an open world at a constant and steady 60fps is definitely a testament to its prowess. I think we still haven't seen the console's full potential yet, so I hope in the future we will be able to see new software that doesn't have to sacrifice graphical fidelity for framerate, and has the best possible output of both.Hence why I said to each their own. I'm 100% certain I'd see the difference right away, and it would be even easier if we ran on 60 fps mode where the fidelity difference would be slightly lower.
It's DEFINITELY that. I mean, we can talk all about how iPhones are the most mainstream, what's trendy, and the source of the whole blue bubble vs green bubble problem in the United States.You could lower the profit margins but you'd never get the flagship phones of today for $500, they do cost more than that to make. There are cheaper versions available though so people can get something more affordable, and the vast majority would do just as fine with those as with the best. I think the problem just becomes that people want the best just because. Some talk about status, but I've never seen the point in that. So many people have the most expensive phones anyway as it's still a relatively cheap luxury product compared to a luxury car, or something like that.
I have a Pixel 8 pro, and I personally went for the pro because I don't want to miss out on any camera features. Google didn't always make camera features exclusive to the bigger phone;this started with the 6 series, I think. But I hate having big phones. I'd rather have the standard size.