souvlaki
Superhero
- Joined
- Dec 30, 2003
- Messages
- 5,794
- Reaction score
- 816
- Points
- 103
I don't believe you have any idea of my expectations of this debate, you certainly have a right to your opinion, as do I.....but don't read something into mine....that isn't there.
I wasn't referring to you, I was referring to the general consensus about her performance in the mainstream media. The basic attitude that night was that she did pretty good. She gave a passable performance that night, nothing more, nothing less. And when she couldn't answer the questions, she'd change the subject to energy, or something she knew something about. The only reason as far as I'm concerned a lot of people (not necessarily you) thought she did a good job that night is because their expectations up to that point was that she was going to be a drooling wreck. After the Couric interview, and the Gibson interview expectations were low. She managed to surpass those rather low expectations, good for her. Doesn't mean she was a good choice for Vice President, and certainly doesn't mean she'll be a good candidate for President in four years. All it means is she has good memorization skills.