The Technology Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
The Future of Interstellar Communication Goes "Pew, Pew, Pew"

It's no subspace transceiver but this prototype communicator bound for the ISS could revolutionize how we share data over the vast expanses of solar space. It will deliver Gigabit speeds through deep space.

As the quality and quantity of onboard sensors improve on NASA's interplanetary probes and orbital telescopes continue to increase, so too does both the amount of data they generate and the amount of bandwidth needed to transmit that back in a timely fashion. You wouldn't try to push an HD video feed through a 56k baud modem any more than you'd try to suck a golf ball through a garden hose or pass a 100-couric behemoth but that's roughly what NASA's current transmission standards can handle.

"Right now, many of our deep space missions communicate at 200 to 400 kilobits per second." said Mission Manager Matt Abrahamson in a press release. "Optical communications has the potential to be a game-changer."

OPALS, Optical Payload for Lasercomm Science, is a prototype laser-based communications system ("lasercomm") technology demonstrator awaiting launch to the International Space Station. It's current iteration is limited to 50Mb/s aboard the ISS, but it is setting the groundwork for future deep space lasercomms capable of potentially delivering 1 Gb/s transmissions from Mars and beyond.

"It's like upgrading from dial-up to DSL," the project's systems engineer Bogdan Oaida said in a press release. "Our ability to generate data has greatly outpaced our ability to downlink it. Imagine trying to download a movie at home over dial-up. It's essentially the same problem in space, whether we're talking about low-Earth orbit or deep space."

The OPALS system was designed and built by JPL engineers using, largely, off-the-shelf parts. "We were not as constrained by mass, volume or power on this mission as we were by cost," said Abrahamson. And since the system relies on a frequency band outside of the RF spectrum, it is unregulated by the FCC which means it won't interfere with existing transmission technologies.

The system was supposed to launch on Monday as part of the SpaceX-3 resupply mission aboard a Falcon 9. However a helium leak in the first stage of the Falcon 9 rocket scrubbed that attempt. Now, Friday's launch window is only around 40 percent given the prevailing weather. Either way, once OPALS is installed it will begin a 90 day testing phase (though it's service may be extended if everything works out well).

http://www.slashgear.com/iss-experiment-will-beam-video-to-earth-using-a-laser-14325094/

But the real question is when am I going to get my freaking sharks with freaking laser beams attached to their heads?!
 
Why Aereo Matters

cdkoeqyd6bqngplpfkif.jpg


On April 22nd, the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in the case of the television networks versus Aereo, an innovative service that lets you stream broadcasts over the internet. How it's decided could define the future of television, and how we watch it.

While Aereo seems to be a logical evolution of live TV for the internet, it undermines the network business model—and it might also be illegal. CBS has even threatened to take its broadcast station off the air and go cable only if Aereo is allowed to keep it up. If it goes away, though, your most promising shot at cutting the cord goes with it. Here are the stakes, and how it might pan out.

How Aereo Works

Aereo's premise is both simple and appealing. The service lets you watch local broadcast TV stations over the internet, and record shows to watch later. It's essentially a digital TV antenna combined with a cloud DVR, except without the need for any specialized hardware. Aereo takes care of all of it for you in the cloud.

Using it feels like Hulu except you're watching live broadcast TV. You login, pick a channel, and watch whatever's on. If you'd previously set Aereo to record some shows, you can watch those, too. It's not cable, but rather the stuff that comes for free over the airwaves, so depending on which of the 11 available markets you're in, you have access to different channels.

683742442125750957.jpg


In practical terms, Aereo has become the most important ingredient in the cord-cutter's cocktail, giving you access to live, appointment television—the Oscars, say, or major sporting events carried by the networks—along with DVR powers, all for far less than your cable bill demands. Combined with Netflix and Hulu Plus, you're pretty much home free. Which might explain why the networks aren't very pleased.

Broadcast TV Is Free For You But Costs Everyone Else a Fortune

It's not immediately obvious why Aereo should be so contentious; if you've got bunny ears, you can already grab the airwaves for free. Traditional antennas, though, are less reliable and convenient than a cloud-based rig, putting the onus on the individual customer to get the set-up working.

And while those individuals can watch ABC and Fox and whatever else they can pull down from the sky for free, cable, satellite, and fiber operators have to pay broadcast networks to retransmit your favorite live programming. As for streaming services, they're all paying, too. Hulu is partially owned by the networks that are suing Aereo, and it pays for the streams with advertising. Similarly, Netflix pays handsomely so you can binge watch entire seasons of network programming.

So this is why the networks have an issue with Aereo. Even though it charges its customers $8 per month, it doesn't pass a penny of that onto the networks. Even worse, it automates what used to be the niche, frustrating process of purchasing an antenna, positioning it just right, and hoping it held on through inclimate weather. It just plucks TV out of the sky and sends it to you.

Taking It To the Courts

Almost immediately after Aereo launched, ABC, CBS, NBC, an FOX all went after the company for violating their copyright. The biggies are trying to shut Aereo down by categorizing it as a "retransmission," which copyright law defines as a public performance of a work. That's what cable companies do; retransmit content to a broad audience, much like showing it in the town square. And they've got to pay to do it.

Aereo, on the other hand, claims its providing a private service. In fact, the company developed technology to explicitly bypass existing copyright law. Its data centers are filled with millions of tiny antennas, each dedicated to a single user. The dime-sized antennae grab the content from terrestrial broadcast frequencies, and it's all processed and beamed to you over your internet connection. Here's what they look like:

yhtybnwrpix4jbwx082d.jpg


It's an incredibly clever technicality, and one that's held up so far. The networks have failed to convince lower courts that Aereo violates copyright, though it's unclear which way the Supreme Court might fall. The copyright issue is so central to Aereo's business that it petitioned the Supreme Court to hear the case, even though it had won in the lower courts. It wants to put the matter to rest once and for all. And if it loses, it may cease to exist once and for all.

What's at Stake

Aereo's death would be a huge blow to cord-cutters, or to anyone who's ever considered it . For those of us who don't actually own TVs—I'm one of them!—Aereo is a godsend. It's not the only way I can watch, but it's an easy, slick alternative to hooking up an antenna to my computer.

What's more, losing Aereo would stifle innovation. The networks are digging in their heels because the system works for them. If, however, it turns out out that Aereo is legal, they might be forced to come up with their own comparable solution. The WSJ reported that CBS is considering launching its own competing service for its broadcasts if Aereo wins. While the networks warn that Aereo could lead to a sad world in which all good TV is paid, the pendulum could swing the other way, and the industry might evolve to match the IP connected world we live in.

That's why Aereo is so important. Lose it, and we're still stuck tethered to a cable system that's broken and unfair. Keep it, and not only do we get choice in a way we haven't before, we get the possibility of an entire industry fighting for our attention, instead of taking it for granted. That's something worth fighting for.

I really hope Aereo wins so we can innovate instead of stagnate
 
This Simple Siri Hack Lets You Control Anything With Your iPhone

q0gihwigofb3n88rpqgi.png


Voice control is a super convenient way to control stuff with your phone, at least when your AI isn't just shouting error messages at other computers. Googolplex makes it even better by unlocking Siri to let her control your stereo, your thermostat; honestly, just about anything.

The premise is simple; by just changing your iPhone's proxy settings to run through Googolplex's servers, you can bolt on a basically unlimited set of extra commands to Siri. All you have to do is preface your voice commands with "Googolplex." From there, the service can use your commands to control things like Spotify, or a Nest thermostat. You could even use it to start your Tesla (if you have one). It's like If This Then That for Siri.

Googolplex already has a bunch of example commands built-in, but once you sign up and create an account, you start making your own with Javascript. Or you can just wait for other, nerdier folks to do it.

There are a few catches though. Since your commands have to be routed through Googolplex on their way to Siri, it adds a little delay to Siri's already kind of sluggish response time. Also, Googolplex works by creating a man-in-the-middle attack—as the team describes in great detail on their site—effectively snatching its own copy of all your voice-queries.

Once you've set up Googolplex, a script on your phone decides which bits and bytes get routed through Googolplex servers, and they promise they only take voice commands that start with "Googolplex," both for your privacy and to keep their servers from melting. Still, you're basically opening up your whole phone to sniffing, so while it might be fun to try out and play with, it's probably not smart to keep it enabled all the time if you care at all about your privacy. Not to mention the next version of iOS will probably lock this loophole down.

In the meantime though, Googolplex a fun and easy way to give Siri some new functionality, and a look at how awesome voice control could really be if it was totally open to be used by third party developers. And until Apple breaks it, it's a fun little toy you can go play with right now.

http://betterthansiri.com/

Cool thing for all you iNuts out there
 
You're Not Allowed to Sue General Mills If You Like Them on Facebook

You probably don't spend a lot of time thinking about the legal implications of liking something on Facebook, but you should. General Mills quietly updated its privacy policy so that doing things like using a coupon, entering a sweepstakes, or liking the brand means you can't sue them. Really.

The new language is clearly designed to help keep the company out of court. Last year alone, the company spent $8.5 million to settle a single lawsuit related to Yoplait packaging. Now, they just want to handle that kind of thing over email. According to The New York Times, "anyone who has received anything that could be construed as a benefit and who then has a dispute with the company over its products will have to use informal negotiation via email or go through arbitration to seek relief, according to the new terms posted on its site." This is also known as "forced arbitration."

It's important to remember that this is just a change in General Mills policy, one that won't necessarily hold up in court. While a 2011 Supreme Court decision gives companies more latitude to prohibit class action arbitration, legal experts say that General Mills would have to prove that customers knew about this new policy in order to enforce it. That's a pretty difficult thing to do.

If you find this scenario unsettling, there's another way to avoid it. Just don't buy General Mills products. And definitely don't like them on Facebook or enter any contests. However, the more alarming thing about this news is the fact that policies such as this are becoming increasingly commonplace. "It's essentially trying to protect the company from all accountability, even when it lies, or say, an employee deliberately adds broken glass to a product," Julia Duncan, an arbitration expert at the American Association for Justice, told The Times.

Suddenly those Lucky Charms don't seem so lucky, huh?

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/17/b...brand-online-voids-the-right-to-sue.html?_r=0

HAHA good luck with that BS
 
Guy Builds Spider-Man's Webslinger Using an Electromagnetic Launcher

h1idhfjp74wvyt7trhlv.gif


Since scientists have yet to figure out a formula for real-life human spiderwebs (c'mon, guys!), hardware hacker Patrick Priebe took matters into his own hands. But since he's limited by real-world constraints too, he instead engineered this wrist-worn electromagnetic miniature harpoon launcher.

[YT]xXp0XQYJAT4[/YT]

In some ways, Priebe has one-upped Spidey. His rig includes laser targeting and since the harpoon remains connected to the launcher via a length of fishing line, you can even reel back in whatever you've snagged. You sadly won't be using it to swing from building to building, but it at least gives you some of Spider-Man's capabilities without all that superhero drama.

http://www.gizmag.com/spider-man-webshooter/31678/

Cool as all get out
 
​Eyefi Cloud Syncs Photos From Your Camera to the Internet in a Flash

npaotuwx9gsbtyoc5i5g.jpg


Basically every new camera that comes out these days has Wi-Fi on-board, but the technology hasn't progressed to the point that it's seamless. There's still a little friction when you're trying to get photos from your camera to another device—and that's still one step removed from the internet. Wi-Fi enabled SD card maker Eyefi is hoping to help fix that problem with Eyefi Cloud.

Eyefi Cloud works with the Mobi SD card the company released last year. Mobi was a step in the right direction for Eyefi, simplifying the task of getting your photos from your camera to your phone. Though Eyefi was a pioneer in getting Wi-Fi into cameras—the company's first cards dropped in 2006, before the current deluge of new Wi-Fi shooters—the system has always been kind of a pain to use. (Eyefi is rebranding and will hereafter be "Eyefi" rather than "Eye-Fi".)

The Mobi card made wirelessly transferring photos about as simple as it is with the best Wi-Fi camera options. The card turns itself into a wireless hotspot your phone connects to. Depending on how crowded the airwaves are, and the mood of your particular session with the Eyefi Mobi app, the transfer is somewhere between super simple to slightly frustrating.

Now with Eyefi Cloud, the app can push photos to Eyefi's servers as well. It's almost as simple as photo syncing offered by Dropbox, Google Drive, and others though, not completely because your phone needs to ditch the Wi-Fi connection with the card before it can connect to the internet and upload your photos. As you can see in the images in this post, the interface will look pretty familiar to anyone who has used a basic online photo album before. There's a web-based desktop version, as well as apps for iOS and Android.

Eyefi Mobi cards all come with a three month membership to Eyefi Cloud, and if you already own a Mobi card, you'll get the deal as well. A 12-month membership costs $50.

Cloud storage options abound these days, and it seems a little silly to pay $50 a year to store just your photos when you can get a terabyte of free photo storage from Flickr. On the other hand, getting photos from your camera to the cloud and synced across your devices from a single provider might be worth paying for. In my experience using the new service for a few minutes I can say it's definitely easy, if not definitely easy enough to be worth it.

http://www.eyefi.com/company/press-...s-get-mobile-and-social-with-eye-fis-new-mobi
 
Sony Is Not Going to be Buying Xbox

Forbes contributor Adam Hartung dropped a bomb on the business world this morning when he forecast the complete collapse of Microsoft's business and the company's sudden exit from the entertainment market. Hartung draws on Surface's mediocre sales and the PC market's woes to claim that "Microsoft makes nothing from its xBox/Kinect entertainment division."

He goes on to make dire predictions related to Windows, Office, and Microsoft's other businesses, but we're going to focus on the Xbox comments -- they're easily the most entertaining.

According to Hartung:
The entertainment division will be spun off, sold to someone like Sony or even Barnes & Noble, or dramatically reduced in size. Unable to make a profit it will increasingly be seen as a distraction to the battle for saving Windows - and Microsoft leadership has long shown they have no idea how to profitably grow this business unit.
Mr. Hartung, Reality Would Like A Word

Let's start with the claim that the Xbox division is unable to make a profit. That's easy to check -- all we need to do is consult Microsoft's own press releases.

Note that the product mix inside the entertainment division changes a bit depending on Microsoft's mix. When Zune products were on the market, they were included in this category. Windows Phone 8 devices are also counted here. The Xbox, in other words, isn't the only contributor. Nevertheless, it seems odd to claim that Microsoft "can't make a profit" on Xbox, or that Microsoft has no idea how to grow the business unit. That giant bump in FY 2011 was partly thanks to Kinect. Smart Glass and Xbox gaming integration on Windows 8 devices might be small steps, but they're good steps.

Now, it's true that if we step back and consider the entire Xbox console cycle, from 2003 - the end of calendar 2012, Microsoft has lost $2.8B on Xbox and Xbox 360. To put that in perspective, Redmond lost $2B on its online services division (excluding a goodwill charge of $6.2B) just last year.. If we exclude the development costs of the original Xbox from those figures and only consider 2005 - Q1 of fiscal year 2013, the gap is much smaller -- only about $426M.

It was obvious from Day 1 that Microsoft would lose money for the entire run of the original Xbox, and that the Xbox 360 would lose large amounts of cash its first few years. That's why the company was strongly considering launching a next-generation Xbox that would be profitable from Day 1. Xbox has been profitable for nearly five years, and if it hasn't finished paying back the balance sheet on the initial investment, it's at least moving the needle in a consistently profitable direction.

But let's say Microsoft wanted to get out of living rooms, even though living rooms are its best bet for continuing to interface with consumers and build a non-Windows product. Raise your hand if you think Sony or Barnes and Noble want to buy Xbox.

Anybody?

This is what happens when analysts daisy chain figures together without bothering to research their work. Sony has a console, therefore, Sony would buy Xbox. Never mind the fact that Sony couldn't afford the division in the first place, doesn't need more debt, and that Microsoft would hardly prep the launch of a next-generation console by forecasting the imminent sale of the entire business. Barnes and Noble is such a ridiculous option I'm not even going to address it.

Hartung finishes off by forecasting the complete destruction and disintegration of Microsoft. Failure, according to him, is "already inevitable." Expect Redmond to lay off 50-60% of its employees within three years.

Or not. Forbes has pulled the story while I was writing this

Read more: http://hothardware.com/News/Forbes-...Xbox-To-Sony--or-Barnes--Noble/#ixzz2zAKKwcQc

I must admit I got a little excited when I first heard about this late last night but upon further inquiry it's a load of garbage. Oh well, long live PS4!
 
This Bionic Ankle Walks Like It's Alive

[YT]AFeBi1lpXsQ[/YT]

The human lower leg is a marvel of biological engineering—it lets you have a long, strong stride while minimizing exertion and joint strain. But conventional spring and hydraulically-driven prosthesis worn by amputees offer no such benefit and can cause osteoarthritis-inducing skeletal strains. The BiOM T2 system aims to rectify that.

The last time we discussed the BiOM company, it was still calling itself iWalk, and had just begun rolling out the T2 system. Today, more than 900 such devices have been distributed with nearly half being employed by US veterans.

The T2 system essentially replaces the function of its wearer's lost calf and tendon, providing more energy than it stores. See, when you stride, your trailing leg calf and achilles tendon flex, propelling you forward. Since this requires more energy than what is absorbed during the stride, it can't be accurately replicated by a passive system of springs and hydraulics.

[YT]3lkv7iLyiug[/YT]

The T2 however, employs a pair of microprocessors and six environmental sensors to adjust the bionic ankle stiffness, contraction power, position, and damping thousands of times each stride. It stiffens the ankle at heel strike to dampen the shock, then softens and flexes the joint to propel the user forward in an easier gait. The system can adapt nearly instantly to changing terrain and walking cadence and is programmed to match the wearer's walk during its initial fitting, or "Personal Bionic Tuning" as the company calls it.

Still, the benefits come hard and fast once the users get used to the system. The system is much easier to adapt to than conventional peg legs. "Often, within minutes, a patient is walking around, even running around," Hugh Herr, an Associate Professor of Media Arts and Sciences at Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) and BiOM's CTO, said in a press release. Other models can take weeks or even months to get used to. And since the T2 delivers a more natural gait than passive prostheses, stress on the rest of the leg and lower back is reduced, which potentially can slow or delay the onset of osteoarthritis, endemic among aging amputees.

http://www.rdmag.com/news/2014/04/bionic-ankle-“emulates-nature”

Well that is pretty cool
 
Nike Is Killing the FuelBand

685706318197690182.jpg


Nike has fired the majority of the team responsible for its FuelBand fitness tracker according to a report from CNET today, which also claims that the company is jettisoning wearable hardware for good. An anonymous source says that roughly 55 employees were let go from Nike's Digital Sport hardware team, which covers industrial design and engineering for wearables.

It sounds as though rumblings of the news surfaced on Secret at least a week ago, but CNET cites emails from Nike spokesman Brian Strong, who commented that the company will "make changes within the team, and there will be a small number of layoffs." A different, anonymous source says that roughly 80 percent of the wearables team has been cut and the remaining staff have been redistributed to other divisions.

As Gizmodo's own Leslie Horn described in a review in November, Nike has struggled with its wearables—both the FuelBand in its first iteration and the second generation SE, which left much to be desired. As competition amongst fitness trackers heated up this year, Nike has struggled to keep up with its peers. And with Google and Apple closing in on the same turf, it seems as though Nike is taking the safer road by bowing out of hardware now.

But keep in mind that just because Nike isn't making hardware any more doesn't mean they're completely out of the game. The company will reportedly continue developing software for wearable devices. Which could mean that if—really, when—Apple introduces its smartwatch later this year, Nike could be a partner, as one analyst told CNET's Nick Statt:

Apple is in the hardware business. Nike is in the sneaker business. I don't think Apple sees Nike as competitive. It's likely that an Apple hardware offering would be supportive of the Nike software.
Will we see an Apple smartwatch running Nike software? It's too soon to tell—but, as Statt comments, it's worth mentioning that Tim Cook kept his FuelBand on to introduce the iPad Mini in 2012.

http://www.cnet.com/news/nike-fires-fuelband-engineers-will-stop-making-wearable-hardware/

I looked into these things when I started exercising and they seemed pretty pointless and expensive. There are free apps that do a better job than these things did. Not surprised to see them go
 
Netflix officially comes out against the Comcast-TWC merger

netflix-reed-hastings.jpg


In addition to news on possible price increases, Netflix on Monday also officially took a stance against the proposed $45 billion merger of Comcast and Time Warner Cable. In its letter to shareholders released Monday, Netflix said that a combined Comcast and TWC would “possess even more anticompetitive leverage to charge arbitrary interconnection tolls for access to their customers.” To back up its reasoning, Netflix said that the decline of DSL has made cable Internet the default broadband technology for most Americans and claimed that if the merger were approved then many American households would have “Comcast as the only option for truly high-speed broadband” that offers service of 10Mbps or higher.

Netflix’s decision to come out against the merger is a big win for Senator Al Franken (D, Minn.), who last week urged the company to publicly oppose the merger and join his efforts to defeat it. As part of his appeal, Franken noted Netflix’s recent protest at having to pay regular fees to Comcast as part of a peering agreement aimed at making sure that its video streams maintained a consistently high quality, which was also something that Netflix noted in its own letter to its shareholders. It’s not known at this time whether Netflix will take a more active role in opposing the merger or whether it will simply state its public disapproval without joining a broader campaign.


Netflix's Letter to its Shareholders

http://files.shareholder.com/downlo...8dece8/Q114 Earnings Letter 4.21.14 final.pdf

Original Article Link

http://bgr.com/2014/04/21/comcast-twc-merger-netflix/
 
This Sci-Fi Helmet Could Give Firefighters Predator Thermal Vision

oyl5ultpate1reubm9xj.jpg


When firefighters have to enter a burning building, much of their job still involves blindly feeling their way through dense plumes of toxic fumes in search of those trapped inside. However, a novel new helmet design could one day give firefighters the ability to see through the smoke and hear beyond the roar of the flames.

Dubbed the C-Thru, this helmet-visor-respirator concept offers a host of integrated functions that are currently only available as standalone devices—such as handheld thermal sensors and communication devices. So rather than having to crawl under the smoke while constantly checking a hand held thermal sensor and trying not the lose the rest of the team behind him in thick smoke, a lead firefighter with a C-Thru helmet could just look around, but with super vision.

Basically, the helmet would wirelessly transmit environmental and video data to a cloud-based analysis service via the firefighter's mobile computing device. Then, the processed information would be distributed to every member of the team and displayed on their HUD visors as a wireframe overlay of their surroundings—similar to the current generation of HUDs employed by the USAF. This would free both of the firefighter's hands for more important tasks, like dragging people to safety. Plus, the recorded video data could be saved for future reference and training—potentially even as evidence in lawsuits against the fire department as the SFFD's helmet cam footage of that Asiana crash was.

x7kax1qtndepnpljt84t.jpg


What's more, the C-thru will reportedly feature a noise-canceling function that could drown out the crackle of the burning building so firefighters could listen for cries for help as well as the telltale crunch of timbers before they collapse. That would also free firefighters from having to scream at each other through their walkie-talkies to be heard. And since the entire system is integrated into the helmet itself, it's just as easy to wear as the existing generation of firefighting helmets.

http://inventorspot.com/articles/swedish-super-helmet-helps-firefighters-see-through-smoke

This is awesome and could save lots of lives
 
Augmented Magnifying Glass Identifies What You're Studying

w7jvzxvx7cqs0wwjfedd.gif


It's obvious that the great Sherlock Holmes doesn't need any help, but the Augmented Magnifier designed and built by Anirudh Sharma and Pattie Maes from MIT's Fluid Interfaces Group could help him instantly recognize clues and solve cases even quicker.

Using a built-in camera and a constant connection to the internet, the Augmented Magnifier can automatically identify what kind of fruit is being viewed, and then overlay an image of its magnified cell structure and scientific name.

So while it's mostly useful for solving mysteries involving fresh produce right now, there's no reason to think that eventually the Augmented Magnifier could be able to recognize almost anything in its lens, providing detailed information that may not have been immediately apparent.

http://www.damngeeky.com/2014/04/22...eed&utm_campaign=Feed:+damngeeky+(Damn+Geeky)

Not really sure why you would need this but it seems cool
 
Apple Now Recycles Any Product You Give Back (and Gives You Credit)

Starting today, all of Apple's retail stores will accept any of the company's ageing products for recycling—and, if it looks resaleable, you might even get some store credit, too.

The scheme is part of Tim Cook's ambition to "leave the world better than we found it." As of today, then, Apple will provide "free, responsible recycling" of any of its products via its bricks-and-mortar stores, though there are no details of what the credit options will be like. Occasionally, Apple will also hold recycling events, too, where it will "accept other companies' products." There's no word if it'll give you Apple vouchers for swapping in your old Samsung—though it might be worth a try!

http://www.apple.com/environment/

E-waste is a big problem so it's good they are doing something about it
 
This Vertical Take-Off Drone System Is So Versatile It's Scary

uqmtmgs4rtarqi4kj58m.jpg


Drones are getting pretty advanced, and they're continuing to prove their usefulness. They can do anything from dodge bullets to land on aircraft carriers. And up next is an emerging new class of drones that can take off and land vertically, thanks to the likes of the new Arcturus UAV Jump system.

The Jump system attaches to the Arcturus UAV T-20 and T-16 and is designed for maximum versatility. With the vertical lift motors and rotors of a quadcopter and the winged flight capability of an airplane, this thing takes less than 15 minutes to attach to the winged aircraft and can go anywhere once it's in the air. The converted drone doesn't need a runway since it lifts straight up off the ground, while its wings give it a long flight range. When you see the system in action, it sort of looks like some Frankenstein of an unmanned aerial vehicle taking to the air with impossible ease.

[YT]omkay1cJmXI[/YT]

This isn't the first time we've seen a winged drone that can take off and land vertically. These sorts of aircraft have been around for a while, but a new bolt-on conversion kit like the Jump brings the capability to drones that already exist.

It's the sort of thing the Pentagon is no doubt interested in. Last year, they announced the X-Plane project to fund the development of a new class of vertical take off and landing aircraft. Those prototypes are already starting to pop up, but it'll be a while before they actually hit the market. The Jump, meanwhile, is available now.

http://www.suasnews.com/2014/04/28706/arcturus-uav-unveils-jump-fixed-wing-vtol-uav/

Alright, now they can launch drones from anywhere!
 
AT&T Is Considering Rolling Out Gigabit Fiber To a Ton of Cities

ns5cavwvxl70cozvs7ti.jpg


Move over, Google Fiber. There's (maybe) a new gigabit internet game in town, and it's (maybe) coming to 100 cities and municipalities by way through AT&T, at some point in the future. Maybe.

Today AT&T announced that it has its fiber internet sights set on 100 U.S. cities and municipalities, 21 of which are major metropolitan areas. It's not a done deal yet though, so don't celebrate. AT&T says its working with these markets to roll it out. Per AT&T:

AT&T will work with local leaders in these markets to discuss ways to bring the service to their communities. Similar to previously announced metro area selections in Austin and Dallas and advanced discussions in Raleigh-Durham and Winston-Salem, communities that have suitable network facilities, and show the strongest investment cases based on anticipated demand and the most receptive policies will influence these future selections and coverage maps within selected areas.
The following are the areas AT&T has its eyes on:

Atlanta
Augusta
Charlotte
Chicago
Cleveland
Ft. Worth
Ft. Lauderdale
Greensboro
Houston
Jacksonville
Kansas City
Los Angeles
Miami
Nashville
Oakland
Orlando
San Antonio
San Diego
St. Louis
San Francisco
San Jose

If Google Fiber is any indication, it will take some time to actually deploy if it happens at all. But the promise—or at least the shadow of a promise—of more fiber internet in more cities is a good thing. Fast internet! Competition! It's good stuff. Especially considering the world of regular cable internet is looking uglier by the minute.

http://arstechnica.com/business/201...00-cities-where-it-could-offer-gigabit-fiber/

Hopefully this happens, we need to try and get away from cable. This is the future
 
New Wireless Power Set Up Charges 40 Smartphones from Across the Room

Wouldn't it be wonderful if you never had to plug in your phone? Well, a team of Korean scientists say that they're one step closer to making that fantasy a reality with new wireless power transfer technology that works from over 15 feet away. And it works pretty damn well, too.

This new system isn't entirely new. It improves upon the basic idea for so-called Coupled Magnetic Resonance System (CMRS) developed by MIT scientists back in 2007. A team from the Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, however, just announced a new option that both simplifies and improves the earlier design, extending the reach of the wireless power transfer from a little over five feet to over 15 feet. It does so with two 10-foot-long boxes made of up compact ferrite core rods with coils of wire in the middle. One of the boxes generates a magnetic field, while the other induces the voltage. They call the set up a Dipole Coil Resonant System (DCRS).

In plain English, anything between the two boxes can tap into the system's power. It effectively generates wireless electricity. The researchers are ambitious about the implications of such technology: "Although the long-range wireless power transfer is still in an early stage of commercialization and quite costly to implement, we believe that this is the right direction for electric power to be supplied in the future," said KAIST engineering professor Chun T. Rim. "Just like we see Wi-Fi zones everywhere today, we will eventually have many Wi-Power zones at such places as restaurants and streets that provide electric power wirelessly to electronic devices. We will use all the devices anywhere without tangled wires attached and anytime without worrying about charging their batteries."

For the time being though, the setup is sophisticated and a bit unwieldy. Not destined for your local Starbucks any time soon.

snwfheqp5zz1bsxz2x7g.jpg


Rim and his team aren't the only ones with such a dream. All kinds of systems are in development around the world with plans to wirelessly power everything from TVs to city buses. Some geniuses have even developed a way to turn WiFi signals into useable electricity. This new DCRS technology certainly is promising, though. In a video, the team showed how they can power an LED TV and three fans wirelessly. They also say they can charge up to 40 smartphones from the other side of the room.

But did notice how there aren't any humans in the charge zone? It makes you wonder: How much cancer does this thing cause? It's a question worth answering before tech like this comes anywhere near you or me.

[YT]R6UCwqjdpo0[/YT]

https://gigaom.com/2014/04/21/wireless-charger-can-power-40-mobile-phones-at-once-from-15-feet-away/

Imagine in the future these set up in every home and major business. You would more than likely never have to plug your devices into a charger ever again
 
My news always gets buried by DJ's bombardment of news all around this thread :(
 
Hey guy I read your Netflix news about the merger. I just assume most people that visit these threads do like I do and go back to the last one they read and then move forward. Hardly anyone comments on my threads unlike your science thread that always has people talking. I think most people just browse my threads
 
Hey guy, don't call me guy! I'm not guy, dude bro. I'm just busting your balls
 
Speaking of Netflix... AT&T is the latest to attack them with a clone service that will probably cost you another $9.99 and further fragment the streaming service into making you pay more.

Netflix still sucks on AT&T, and now AT&T plans to offer Netflix clone

AT&T and an investment group run by former Fox President Peter Chernin announced today that they have created a $500 million venture "to acquire, invest in and launch over-the-top (OTT) video services."

This venture "creates the opportunity for us to develop a compelling offering in the OTT space," AT&T Chief Strategy Officer John Stankey said in the announcement.

OTT services provide video programming over an Internet connection, one that may come across the same wires as a separate cable TV service. AT&T hasn't been a fan of OTT provider Netflix. It's still haggling with the company over how much money the video service should pay for a direct connection to the TV and Internet provider's network. Netflix was able to strike a deal with Comcast, improving video quality for Comcast subscribers; Netflix quality on AT&T has remained substandard.

AT&T's new venture is with the Chernin Group, which Peter Chernin founded in 2009. "This alliance positions AT&T and The Chernin Group to take advantage of the rapid growth of online video and OTT video services, with each party bringing significant and complementary strengths. The strategic goal of this initiative will be to invest in advertising and subscription VOD channels as well as streaming services," the companies said.

Chernin noted that "Consumers are increasingly viewing video content on their phones, tablets, computers, game consoles, and connected TVs on mobile and broadband networks. AT&T’s massive reach on those platforms across mobile and broadband and their commitment to the online video space make them the perfect fit for this venture with us.”

Verizon wants in on this action as well. It also created a video streaming service by partnering with Redbox and is also asking Netflix to pay for a direct connection to its network, even as Verizon users complain of poor Netflix performance. Netflix has tried to avoid making payments, despite giving in to Comcast, and has asked the FCC to issue net neutrality rules that "prevent ISPs from charging a toll for interconnection to services like Netflix, YouTube, or Skype."
Ars Technica
 
You're Not Allowed to Sue General Mills If You Like Them on Facebook

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/17/b...brand-online-voids-the-right-to-sue.html?_r=0

HAHA good luck with that BS
That would get laughed out of court if they tried to enforce it.

And with a bold, hard smack to the head by the internet, General Mills has come to their senses.

General Mills scraps criticized new legal terms


NEW YORK (AP) — General Mills is scrapping a controversial plan to strip consumers of their right to sue the food company.

The company, which owns Cheerios, Progresso and Yoplait, had posted a notice on its website, notifying visitors of a change to its legal terms — visitors using its websites or engaging with it online in a variety of other ways meant they would have to give up their right to sue.

Instead, the new terms said, people would need to have disputes resolved through informal negotiation or arbitration.

The Minnesota-based company's decision was widely denounced on social media after The New York Times wrote a story Wednesday bearing the headline, "When 'Liking' A Brand Online Voids the Right to Sue." The next day, General Mills clarified the meaning of its new terms to say they did not apply when people engaged with its brands on Facebook and Twitter.

"No one is precluded from suing us merely by purchasing our products at the store or liking one of our brand Facebook pages. That is just a mischaracterization," the company said.

The terms would apply in instances such as when people subscribed to one of its publications or downloaded its coupons from its websites, General Mills said.

Despite the clarification, the company apparently continued to feel pressure regarding its new terms and issued another statement late Saturday saying that it decided to return to the previous legal terms.

"We are announcing today that we have reverted back to our prior legal terms, which contain no mention of arbitration," the email said.
USA Today
 
This Utility Truck Can Exterminate a Pothole Every 120 Seconds

tizvjlzdf3ed3do9absm.jpg


Getting crews out to patch roads is sometimes more trouble than its worth. It snarls traffic for hours at a time, costs counties and states hundreds of thousands of dollars annually, and typically only fixes the problem for a short time. But this gravel-blasting utility truck aims to make the permanent patch process faster than firing a gunstick.

The $335,800 "Dalek" is currently on trial in central Bedfordshire. The truck totes around a supply of tar-like glue and asphaltic emulsion material that works in below-freezing temperatures. The operator controls an extendable robotic arm from the cab to first blast away loose gravel and debris in the hole, then spray alternating layers of tar and gravel into the void until it is filled. The entire process takes two minutes on average, 1/30th the time it would take a human road crew.

[YT]gIzRO61COSg[/YT]

"The product is a liquid that's 35 percent water," Kent County Road Commission Maintenance Director Jerry Byrne told ABC 7 (station WXYZ) recently, "So that water needs to come out of the product like a latex paint, if you will, and in cold temps and damp conditions, the wait that you have for is slowed considerably."

Stateside, these machines are more commonly known as Pothole Killers and are widely used throughout the U.S. Built by Patch Management Inc out of Fairless Hills, PA, the system costs roughly $130,000 for a three month contract. Hopefully the truck operators are obligated to continually yell "EXTERMINATE!" during the filling process, too.

http://www.ubergizmo.com/2014/04/dalek-machine-patches-potholes-in-2-minutes/?utm_source=mainrss

I know so many places that could use these suckers
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"