Metallo
Evil Dead Re-Animator
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2010
- Messages
- 11,908
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
I dont "disregard" match quality. I need matches to be fun and exciting. However, what constitutes a "good match" to me is apparently completely different than what makes a good match to you.
The Rock is my favorite ever because his personality and his promos were out of this world. But he was also one of my favorites to watch in the ring because his personality was completely reflected in his ring style.
Was The Rock a great technical wrestler? No. If anyone fought in real life the way Rock did, they'd be in a hospital. There was nothing believable about his fighting style. If this were real fighting, The Rock could not be a credible champion.
But its not real fighting. Its scripted, and these guys are characters. So therefore he became "believable", and thus, credible.
While The Miz isn't a great technical master, I find his ring work to be very enjoyable from a character standpoint. But even more importantly I think that Miz is a great character guy. His character work gets me invested in his matches. Miz has gone a long way in getting me hyped for this wrestlemania match. Yes, The Rock's involvement is a huge contributor, but The Miz is getting me excited for the match in his own right.
Fact is this. When it comes to wrestling, I want my main event to feature great characters first and foremost. The midcarders I feel is the place for the in ring standouts who dont quite have the character. Guys like Jeff hardy, Chris Benoit, hart dynasty, dolph ziggler, John Morrison, these are all guys in my book who have little to no character, but are great ring workers. They belong on the card, but not in the main event. Then you have guys like Shawn Michaels, Kurt Angle, Chris Jericho, etc... who are great workers and great characters too. Thus, it makes these guys all time greats.
But yes, in the main event particularly, I need guys who can carry a story first. If they aren't amazing in ring, that's one thing, but then again, none of the guys who I've loved have ever been lame in the ring. Rock, Austin, Jericho, Michaels, Kurt Angle, Triple H, Undertaker, these guys all brought something to their style even if they weren't the greatest (and some of these guys are). Same with Orton, Cena, Batista, and a lot of these new guys. I've never been bored by a Cena match, or an Orton match, due to their abilities in the ring. I might get bored by the predictable outcome, but I've never been bored by Cena's abilities.
The Miz is no Michaels in the ring. Maybe he's not even Cena. But im not bored by Miz in the ring. I enjoy him as a character, greatly, and his in ring skill as at worst, adequate, to me to be a main eventer.
So perhaps what we have here isn't so much me disregarding match quality, but me having a different definition of a quality match.
Most people here want a fun entertaining match they can buy into. There's nothing "different" about that. i don't think Miz can carry a story exceptionally well inside or outside of the ring. Why is he doing as well as he is now? Well look who he's working with.
As for the Rock/Miz comparison...its got nothing to do with Rock being a technical wrestler. It doesn't matter what they style is as long as people can do something, anything, very well.
The Rocks style was broad and over the top but the man was an amazing athlete...and the Miz is nowhere close to being the pure athlete the Rock was. THATS why the Rock looked believable as a top guy. Not only was he a great athlete but he was a great athlete at close to 6'4." Rock is/was a BIG MAN. The Miz isn't tiny but by wrestling sizes he's average sized at best. I could believe The Rock in there with Austin and Hogan just from an in ring standpoint. I'm not talking about size but the skills he had in his arsenal and a strong enough personality/force of will coupled with his skill.
If Miz had been put in the same ring as Hogan even in his prime it'd be laughable. Miz would't be good enough to job to Hogan. Hogan fought a lot of guys Miz's size but they had something they did exceptionally well to look credible as challenges. Savage and Piper jump to mind. So does Paul Orndorf. So does Shawn Michaels. They all brought something special to the ring but they all have styles different from each other.
The Rock was great at telling a story in the ring...even during his first world title run. The Rock had speed and power going for him...what does the Miz have going for him? Thats the problem with him...he doesn't really do anything exceptionally well.
Austin was no amazing technical wrestler but he could look credible outfistfighing damn near anyone. Bret Hart wasn't the biggest toughest guy but he had the in ring mat based arsenal that made you respect what he could accomplish. Hogan was no great wrestler but he looked believable as a powerhouse. Roddy Piper would fight like a wild man.
Miz's style is generic...and its not even something he can do amazingly well. You talk about characters...Miz doesn't really have much of one as soon as he steps between the ropes. He doesn't have that ferocity of Piper or Austin either...and thats something thats character based. What I'm talking about goes beyond the mechanics of wrestling and into the personality aspect.
Austin had a style that he could do well, look believable doing, and it stood out from everyone else. Miz really doesn't. He's got a character but that character should seep into his in ring style and it really hasn't. Maybe because the character isn't that strong and more of a generalized *****bag who's like the little smartass kid who likes to yap.
Last edited: