There Remaking "The Hulk" check it out

I think he just said around that time Sava, but you know what marvel are like, they always miss announement dates.
 
i hope they dont miss this one
 
Starting over from scratch is such a stupid idea. The first film was good enough and had an excellent cast, so I don't see why they shouldn't make a real sequel to it, and bring in more from the comics in the process. I'm crossing my fingers that Avi Arad is just talking out of his @$$ again.
 
Timstuff said:
Starting over from scratch is such a stupid idea. The first film was good enough and had an excellent cast, so I don't see why they shouldn't make a real sequel to it, and bring in more from the comics in the process. I'm crossing my fingers that Avi Arad is just talking out of his @$$ again.
Can't you agree that the film wasn't good enough for most people?
 
I SEE SPIDEY said:
Can't you agree that the film wasn't good enough for most people?

It was good under the assumption that the sequel would be better. And personally I hold it as one of the better comicbook films of the last 6 years.
 
Cracker Jack said:
Be careful Golgo13, we could very well go from the frying pan into the fire. If they made a Hulk movie anywhere close to FF.................*Shutter* .......Oh dread is the only word I can think of. :eek:
True.

They'd have to be completely and utterly drunk on the set of this re-make, 24/7, to **** up the same movie twice! It doesn't have to be a feel good summer pop-corn flick like Spidey. It should just be free of all that excess psycho babble. While watching Hulk, it felt as though i was watching a training video on becoming a Psychiatrist rather than viewing a Marvel movie...it was unnerving.
 
all the people who think Marvel are going to f**k up the new Hulk use Xmen3, FF, Daredevil as examples as to how they would screw it up. These are all Fox films. Marvel will try their best, they will hire the best people they think is right for the character and the movie.
 
Sava said:
all the people who think Marvel are going to f**k up the new Hulk use Xmen3, FF, Daredevil as examples as to how they would screw it up. These are all Fox films. Marvel will try their best, they will hire the best people they think is right for the character and the movie.

I just dont trust marvel lately, i think they have made some terrible decisions with a lot of their movies not just the Fox one's. Until i hear something better coming from them, i will continue to believe they dont have a clue what they are doing.
 
AVEITWITHJAMON said:
I just dont trust marvel lately, i think they have made some terrible decisions with a lot of their movies not just the Fox one's. Until i hear something better coming from them, i will continue to believe they dont have a clue what they are doing.
fair enough, the only movie marvel themselves have done is Avengers, that was ok. I don think Marvel will go forward witrh a script unless they are sure %100 that its the right one. Hulk and IM are too important to f**k up.
 
Well it just showed me when they signed Penn for this. The guy has never had a hit movie in his life, and they sign him up for 2 or 3 future projects!!! Alvin Sargeant, David Hayter, Joss Whedon, these are the people they should be signing up for future projects.
 
why do you think Penn sucks?... you cant use Elektra and X3 because no matter how good you are, fox will always find a way of f**king up your movie. Penn has something that Marvel likes, i dont know his 96 script but that seems to have made Avi happy. Avi isnt a complete idiot people here think he is, he knows what the majority wants and likes. In the end, isnt that what we all want, people to love Hulk just as much as us?
 
Sava said:
why do you think Penn sucks?... you cant use Elektra and X3 because no matter how good you are, fox will always find a way of f**king up your movie. Penn has something that Marvel likes, i dont know his 96 script but that seems to have made Avi happy. Avi isnt a complete idiot people here think he is, he knows what the majority wants and likes. In the end, isnt that what we all want, people to love Hulk just as much as us?

Penn has never written a good movie IN HIS LIFE. Thats why i think he sucks, dont get me wrong, i would love for him to prove me totally wrong and belt out a great Hulk SEQUEL. But i cant see it happening, and i'm sorry, but Arad has let Fox get away with MURDER, and he definately had some say on how all of those movies turned out.
 
the guy is just starting out, Fox can do what ever they want because they bought the rights, either Avi says yes and makes some money or they would have told him a f**k off. He had little to no input, All he does is bring in extra money. Your pissed at Penn for writing X3 and what they did with Cyclops. Without Fox over his shoulders, Penn should be able to put out a great film... i hope.
 
No you've got it wrong Sava, i dont hate Penn for what he did to Cyclops, I did before the movie, but he has since made it clear it was Fox's fault. I dont like him (or his writing skills even) becuase X3 was a **** movie, and one that has ruined my childhood dreams of a movie about the Pheonix saga. X3 was a bad movie, thats why i dont like him.
 
AVEITWITHJAMON said:
No you've got it wrong Sava, i dont hate Penn for what he did to Cyclops, I did before the movie, but he has since made it clear it was Fox's fault. I dont like him (or his writing skills even) becuase X3 was a **** movie, and one that has ruined my childhood dreams of a movie about the Pheonix saga. X3 was a bad movie, thats why i dont like him.
i dont think he's at fault for that, Fox is the main reason for that. Not him, if he f**ks up the next Hulk movie, then you'd be right
 
Oh i do count Fox as the main ****-ups were X3 was concerned, but Penn, Kinberg and even Ratner all contributed ****ty scenes, diologue, etc that i still hate them for.
 
AVEITWITHJAMON said:
Oh i do count Fox as the main ****-ups were X3 was concerned, but Penn, Kinberg and even Ratner all contributed ****ty scenes, diologue, etc that i still hate them for.
yet still you dont seem to blame Singer for making Cyclops a secondary character
 
Timstuff said:
It was good under the assumption that the sequel would be better. And personally I hold it as one of the better comicbook films of the last 6 years.
Good for you:up: but that still doesn't change the fact that most people didn't enjoy the film.
 
AVEITWITHJAMON said:
No you've got it wrong Sava, i dont hate Penn for what he did to Cyclops, I did before the movie, but he has since made it clear it was Fox's fault. I dont like him (or his writing skills even) becuase X3 was a **** movie, and one that has ruined my childhood dreams of a movie about the Pheonix saga. X3 was a bad movie, thats why i dont like him.


This is funny. I take it you hate him because of the changes made to the X-Men. Right? HAHAHAHA. But it's ok to change The Hulk as long as you like it? BAH!!! :mad: Unlike you, I don't hate Ang Lee or go around saying he doesn't have talent. You hating Zak has given me hope for The Incredible Hulk. :D
 
Sava said:
yet still you dont seem to blame Singer for making Cyclops a secondary character
Ofcourse he doesn't, Singer followed the comicbooks to a T. Wolverine was always the leader, Storm was always a whinney b**ch and Rogue was always a whinney little Jubilee knock off.

All Hail Singer King of X-men!
 
Sava said:
yet still you dont seem to blame Singer for making Cyclops a secondary character

He didnt in the first movie, and the second movie was based on a comic that had even less Cyclops in than X2 did. They added extra Cyke scene's in the script stages because they wanted him in it more than he was in the comic. Also its clear that the end of X2 set up Cyclops to be a major character in Singers third movie, and the writers of X2, who Singer took with him to SR have srecently described how they would end the movie and believe me, it is all about Cyclops, Wolverine is not even in sight in their ending.
 
Cracker Jack said:
This is funny. I take it you hate him because of the changes made to the X-Men. Right? HAHAHAHA. But it's ok to change The Hulk as long as you like it? BAH!!! :mad: Unlike you, I don't hate Ang Lee or go around saying he doesn't have talent. You hating Zak has given me hope for The Incredible Hulk. :D

I have NEVER gone around saying i hate Ang Lee ever. And i didnt mind the changes in the Hulk movie because, i was never as big a fan of that character as i was the X-Men and also origin movies are very hard to get right. I have never complained about the changes in X1. But X3 is based on the Pheonix Saga. One of the best stories ever written, and there are certain aspects of that that you just dont change. I'm happy they changed some things, do you hear me moaning about the omission of the Shi'ar? Do you hear me complaining about the omission of the battle on the moon? NO because these changes are acceptable. But other changes they made are not IMO.
 
AVEITWITHJAMON said:
He didnt in the first movie, and the second movie was based on a comic that had even less Cyclops in than X2 did. They added extra Cyke scene's in the script stages because they wanted him in it more than he was in the comic. Also its clear that the end of X2 set up Cyclops to be a major character in Singers third movie, and the writers of X2, who Singer took with him to SR have srecently described how they would end the movie and believe me, it is all about Cyclops, Wolverine is not even in sight in their ending.
Ofcourse they would say that now, if they actually went down to writing it, i bet you they would have changed it. Wolverine is the character Singer developed in the first 2 and totally f**k Cyclops. I think they added in extra scenes for Cyclops because they knew that not having him in the main story would piss off fans. So they gave him just enough to do but alot.
 
AVEITWITHJAMON said:
I have NEVER gone around saying i hate Ang Lee ever. And i didnt mind the changes in the Hulk movie because, i was never as big a fan of that character as i was the X-Men and also origin movies are very hard to get right. I have never complained about the changes in X1. But X3 is based on the Pheonix Saga. One of the best stories ever written, and there are certain aspects of that that you just dont change. I'm happy they changed some things, do you hear me moaning about the omission of the Shi'ar? Do you hear me complaining about the omission of the battle on the moon? NO because these changes are acceptable. But other changes they made are not IMO.

I wasn't saying you were running around saying you hated Ang. Sheesh. Can you see the similarites between you and I? You hated the changes to The Dark Phoenix story. I hated the changes to The Hulks story. I'm not a big X-men fan, I'm a Hulk fan. I'll agree that changes are sometimes necessary. However, from what you just said really gets me. You're not a "big" Hulk fan yet you think the changes, to one of the greatest origins and character comic history, were necessary? If you're not such a "big" fan, where do you get off saying this? I could say the same about the X-men movies but I don't. I wouldn't insult the fans of the characters buy saying they needed to be updated. I liked the X-men movies. I liked X-men 3. Not so much for the story, but because it was entertaining. I understand that there are a lot of hard core fans that hate it and I respect them and feel their pain. Maybe now you'll understand where this Hulk fan is comming from.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,317
Messages
22,084,695
Members
45,883
Latest member
marvel2099fan89
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"