Three possible "Joe 2" directors named?

More like $200+ million, and yeah it didn't do awesome - OK at best.

If Paramount didn't lose The Avengers to the Mouse, then we wouldn't be talking about a G.I. Joe sequel for next August. They can't just have Star Trek 2 next summer even though it'll be one of the monster hits of 2012. Gotta have more than merely one big genre tentpole and thus Joe 2 suddenly got fast-tracked after months of dead-silence upon the Zombieland writers (hiring them was the easiest and cheapest part of the process - just because they were hired, didn't mean the sequel was for sure a go) turned their stuff in.

I'd say be grateful that a sequel is happening.

I see no reason to grateful, I would rather have no sequel then a bad sequel.
 
^ Same here. They shouldn't get to spit in my eye and expect me to say "thanks for the spit!"
 
That would be a valid point if the first movie wasn't so terrible; albeit in an entertaining manner. It's still a bad movie made by a director who's made some pretty bad movies and in fact was fired off it during post-production for awhile.

This isn't a franchise worthy of putting up so high on a pedestal, and these whiny reactions to Chu is laughable frankly.
 
They aren't laughable at all FilmNerdJamie. To me it just reinforces that there is no hope for the sequel at all. Some hoped maybe for a fresh start but that definitely won't happen now.

I think its more laughable to say we should be GRATEFUL for a sequel. I honestly would've rather they just let the franchise go for now and maybe revisit it in a couple of years. The first movie IMHO did not do well enough to justify a sequel. And now they are going with this cheap B-movie approach for a sequel that will barely have any of the actors back anyway. Seems pointless to do.
 
They aren't laughable at all FilmNerdJamie. To me it just reinforces that there is no hope for the sequel at all. Some hoped maybe for a fresh start but that definitely won't happen now.

I think its more laughable to say we should be GRATEFUL for a sequel. I honestly would've rather they just let the franchise go for now and maybe revisit it in a couple of years. The first movie IMHO did not do well enough to justify a sequel. And now they are going with this cheap B-movie approach for a sequel that will barely have any of the actors back anyway. Seems pointless to do.

The only remarks pertaining to this movie here were "If they hire Chu, then ****.THIS.MOVIE!" prior to his hiring. Followed by the loud whining about how the sequel was suddenly "doomed" and "THEY DON'T CAAAAAAAARE!"

All without a single frame being shot, not knowing the full details (such as what new characters are showing up), simply not giving the dude a chance and once again this franchise (especially after Rise of Cobra and that animated series, which I loved as a kid, but is also very bad) being treated as something prestigious.

Rise of Cobra
was a pure B-movie with an incredibly high (read: $200 million+) budget. So just because the sequel is having a considerably tighter budget (hence why Sommers was left go because his price-tag was too high and people like Chu, F. Gary Gray and Jaume Collet-Serra were up to replace him) doesn't make it any less of a B-movie than the first.

So yes, these reactions are laughable.
 
Last edited:
I've seen Chu's work, I don't think he deserves a chance. And the only reason the first movie cost so much was because it was rushed into production during a strike period. That's why the movie cost so much yet looked so cheap and ridiculous on screen. Visuals looked terrible and half-finished.
 
There is only one true GI Joe Movie:

[YT]DN034sBeF4c&feature=related[/YT]

That other one is a fabrication.
 
All movies are a fabrication. The old movie was even crappier than ROC.
 
The cartoon GI Joe film was TERRIBLE! And I do mean, TERRIBLE!!! In every way.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
202,272
Messages
22,077,998
Members
45,878
Latest member
Remembrance1988
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"