Transformers trailer thread (Drak approved)

Keep in mind that didn't include the hundreds of comic books, many of which had far more complex story arcs and character dynamics.

Of course Micheal (Pearl Harbor missed the point) Bay ignored 97% of that to make his generic, half-assed version as if millions of life-long fans simply didn't exist or matter.

The origin of the Transformers in the cartoon is, basically, that they were created to be mechanized servants, but they grew advanced enough to have feelings and free will, and eventually rebelled. Personally, I think that's pretty interesting, especially as the rebelling robots are presented as freedom fighters as well as the evil conquering robots you see so often. In fact,t his is the basic difference between Autobots and Decepticons. I also find the whole idea of mechanical life that is, essentially, equal to or superior to biological life appealing. These aren't Terminators, they have human emotions and human weaknesses.

- AICN talkbacker

But I really liked that they were almost never portrayed as robots. They could be stupid, narcissistic, heroic, greedy, nerdy, power-hungry or whatever. And the cartoon gradually established that mechanical life was just as viable and established in the universe as organic life, it was simply an alternative.

- AICN talkbacker #2

Transformers are just archetype to project the human condition onto, like a myth. It's about human nature - war and freedom vs. tyranny. The archetypes are interesting, people are obviously very attached to Prime's fatherly John Wayne Sheriff type. The different characters reflect the different ways people respond to the nature of power (there are no pacifists on the Decepticon side). The hook with the robots and transforming is to sell toys and to get kids to buy into it.

But the reason it's so successful is that they are just like us, only transforming robots. It's an authentic depiction of human nature in a fantastic setting. It's the same reason comic book characters are so appealing.

AICN talkbacker #3


Oh, and the reason they're on earth, at least form the cartoon again, is because the 4-million-year war on their home planet has consumed almost all their resources, and Earth is still energy rich enough to be useful. So they came here millions of years ago, but both sides were trying to get here first, battled in the sky, and crash-landed, essentially dying until volcanic activity reactivated the Decepticon ship millions of years later.

Now that I think about it, Transformers could really be a parable for just about anything. Religious strife, waning energy resources, whatever. Funny, that.

- AICN talkbacker #4

The transformers don't usually have separate tools or vehicles. they ARE their own tools and vehicles. This is where things get creepy, because they make new transformers to gain a tactical edge. Essentially, for Transformers at war, the act of reproduction is the same as an arms race. This is a case where the troops literally cannot be seen in a separate light from their weapons. It's an interesting theme, one that certainly even casts a suspicious light on autobots motivations as well.

AICN talkbacker

Reproduction used as an arms race? I'd say that's a deep concept you won't find in any kid's cartoon today.

Many G1 TF cartoon episodes have more in common with The Twilight Zone and the Outer Limit stories than they have in common with other children cartoons. Can you imagine any children cartoons today with episode titles like these?

Five Faces of Darkness (Part 1)
The Killing Jar
Chaos
Dark Awakening
Starscream's Ghost
Forever Is a Long Time Coming
Madman's Paradise
Carnage In C-Minor
Fight or Flee
Webworld
Ghost In the Machine
The Dweller In the Depths
Nightmare Planet
The Ultimate Weapon
The Quintesson Journal
The Big Broadcast of 2006
Only Human
Grimlock's New Brain
Money Is Everything
Call of the Primitives

Those sound like mature Twilight Zone episodes not a children's toy commercial about cars that turn into robots. :trans:
 
Good post, blind fury.

I think these people that are saying Transformers isn't that deep and doesn't need a deep movie are just lowering the bar for themselves. They're justifying what is probably going to be a completely ******ed movie (going by Bay's past record) and maybe somehow pre-suppressing their own disappointment because they will want to love this movie no matter how bad it probably will be, just like how people wanted to love Phantom Menace although it was a piece of ****. I should know about the last part as I was one of those people for awhile.

There are people that want to love every geek movie that comes out. And they will say anything to defend or justify it.
 
Point blank, I am of the camp that it's not that deep. Yes, I grew up with them same as the rest of us, but all the mythos was created after the fact, because geeky fans like us decided to expand upon it via comic books, novels, and other cartoon spinoffs. The whole concept was created to sell toys, that's it. They're basing this on the concept of the G1 Transformers...the toy line, and bits from the first cartoon. Changes have to be made...Spidey had to have organics, Optimus has to have flames. :o I'm just taking stock in the fact that this is a first time effort to bring them to live action, so I can understand that they can't bring every little nuance. I'll hope the sequel expands on them more, as the ending that's apparantly online seems to leave it wide open if that is the ending they plan on using.
 
The new trailer rocks.:wow:

And who the hell goes to a Michael Bay movie for depth:huh:
If there's any directors movies I go to see just for the visuals and action alone its Bay. He makes big, fun, entertaining movies...and really I dont want anymore out of Transformers than that.
 
My point is that just about ANYTHING can be made with depth. Its close-minded and defeatist to think otherwise. Yes, it's giant robots fighting but we don't have to accept just that. It doesn't have to be damn Citizen Kane but it also doesn't have to be a typical mindless Bay movie.

Like I mentioned before, Jaws on paper seems like something that in the hands of a hack director like Bay, would have become a stupid action movie with Quint jumping on the shark, stabbing it with a huge knife, and riding it through the water as he holds on to the knife. Then they use missle launchers on the shark and it comes back as a robot shark and Brody has to allow himself to get swallowed up so he can punch the internal self destruct button to blow the shark up.

But no. Jaws became one of the best directed movies of all time. A genuinely extremely well made movie that still dealt with something as cliched as a monster which of course was the shark in this movie. But the acting, the dialogue, the cinematography, the intelligence of the story and how it flowed, everything was great because the man in charge saw an opportunity to make something much more than it was on paper.
 
All of this changed in 2005, over 20 years after the start of the Great War. The Decepticons launched a surprise attack on Autobot City, on Earth. Countless Transformers lost their lives in the battle for Autobot City, but the Decepticons were repelled thanks to Optimus Prime's victory over Megatron, a victory that came at the cost of his own life.

Megatron and the other wounded Decepticons were abandoned by the stronger members of the team, in part due to Starscream's desire to usurp Megatron as leader. The God-like Unicron found them drifting in space. He rebuilt Megatron as Galvatron, and sent him on a quest to destroy the Autobot Matrix of Leadership. The Autobots' new leader, Rodimus Prime, was able to stop the Decepticons however. In his first battle as leader, he destroyed Unicron, reclaimed Cybertron for the Autobots, and expelled Galvatron into deep space.

Okay, this is the part of Transformers history I remember most vividly since it was the cartoon movie. You make this sound like a very deep and emotional story (hey I'll admit to being shocked and chocked up when Optimus died), but really it was a really chessy '80s movie (compelete with chessy '80s rock-ballad, "You've got the touch"). I also introduced a bunch of new characters for the sole purpose of selling toys, I remember wanting Hot Rod/Rodimus Prime, Blur and Kup as soon as I left the theater. Why didn't you mention the junk planet, the scene with the robot sharks?

You can make anything deep if you look too far into it, but really it's massive robots trying to kill each other, I really don't want depth in this movie. I don't want Optimus philosphizing with Spike (or whoever Shia Labouf is playing) about Transformers place in the world. I want a big-action summer blockbuster, something I can check my brain at the door and see probably my favorite '80s cartoon/toy line in live action on the big screen.
 
Then you don't much about Transformers. Look at the designs. Totally unrecognizable from the source material just for the sake of making it "cool and hip", something Michael Bay (another problem with the movie) values above substance.

Um... I been watching TF for as long as I can remember, in the late 90s, I use to bootleg the entire series and headmasters on ebay... Yeah... I'm quite invested in TF, I've seen the movie like a hundred times. As for "hip" and "cool", you realize the Transformers has been redone more times than the power-rangers. There ROBOTS which TRANSFORM in a LIVE ACTION movie, you have to add believability, and robots turning into perfectly adjusted robots, doesn't make sense. Bay opted to make them more robotic and junkyard looking and the bots look good.

If you enjoy mindless action movies with over the top special effects and a script as flimsy as a stick of gum without a care for characters or stories, I predict it will cater to that and appeal to those summer movie Joe Sixpacks who crave nothing more.

You realize that you just describe the original TF series? TF the movie is awesome because it's NOT DEEP. You realize this right? Look I'm sorry that most movies don't fit in your little elitist snobbish world so you make **** up so that you can feel better than everyone else but it simply not the case. Transformers is a relatively simple concept... Present human characters the audience cares about- Check. Have evil killer robots who plan on taking over the world thus destroying the humans we care about- Check. Present good Robots to battle evil robots to protect humans we care about- Check. That's all it is. Then throw in the usual cliches and archtypes and you got the transformers. This is a michael bay action movie written all over it... Whether people want to believe it or not, Bay was the perfect man for hte job. He presents us with likeable characters, who we end up caring for which gives tons of energy to his amazing action set pieces. Also don't insinuate the movie audience as being stupid because they don't have teh same insecurities as you, and can enjoy a fun movie.

I think on the other hand, instead of a crap generic premise, they could have made something of intelligence without sacrificing action and awesome robot battles. But we're talking about Michael Bay here, someone who cares only about impressing the audience with explosions and ridiculous action set pieces.

I am sure that's all anyone involved really cares about. :csad:

What the **** are you smoking, THAT"S WHAT TF IS. Your logic is beyond baffling. It's a series that was MADE TO SELL TOYS!!! THE ENTIRE SERIES WAS CHEESY GOOD VS. EVIL FIGHT AFTER ANOTHER, and it was awesome cuz it was huge robots battling each other with cool designs... Did we just watch the same trailer, it looks to have some of the coolest action scenes EVER. Your posts are beyond stupid, if you think that TF is suppose to be deep or intelligent. You want deep watch an Ingmar Bergman film or something...
 
Transformers isn't Evangelion. It was a fun, campy kids' cartoon about giant robots fighting over energy. You don't need a massive pedigree to be able to make TF good. You need to be amazing with action and decent enough with characters, which is what Bay is.
 
I've been watching Transformers since I was a kid. I had pretty much all of the toys with the exception of Megatron, Starscream, and Soundwave. I followed them from childhood to my adult life.

It isn't a deep concept this is true. But as a poster already pointed out neither is Lord of the Rings, Star Wars, Spider-Man, Superman, or even Batman. But the directors of those particular films made them realistic and deep enough for the audience to relate to. I'm not saying Transformers needs to be this deep Return of the King film and so forth.

But in my opinion, Bay appears to be concentrating on the human perspective rather than concentrating on the robots themselves. The robots themselves are characters and have human qualities as well, which is what is displayed in Transformers cartoons and the animated movie in the 80's. Yes, the animated movie had a lot of cheesy moments, and cheesy 80's music. It was the 80's then so it was expected.

The overall concept was dark, epic, and emotional. Transformers is a very good story and the alien robots need to be focused on as well.

The problem is no one wants to think anymore. They want to check their brain at the door which is fine for dumb ADD action film. But with a concept like Transformers there's nothing wrong with adding Prime talking to Spike about Cybertron or space, there's nothing wrong with adding emotion of dying Transformers, and there's nothing wrong with making Autobots and Decepticons actual characters that the audience can relate to.
 
I like how everyone's making grand assumptions about the movie based on a 2 and a half minute trailer.
 
I like how everyone's making grand assumptions about the movie based on a 2 and a half minute trailer.

Yeah, kind of like how all of us were fooled with the X-Men 3 trailer right? The trailer showed an epic, emotional, and intelligent film, and it turned out to be the complete opposite. Yeah, we're all making grand assumptions when it comes to Michael Bay. :whatever:

The trailer does look good. Still doesn't mean we have to like the direction Bay has taken the story. A lot of what we feared of what he would do has been confirmed.
 
I've been watching Transformers since I was a kid. I had pretty much all of the toys with the exception of Megatron, Starscream, and Soundwave. I followed them from childhood to my adult life.

It isn't a deep concept this is true. But as a poster already pointed out neither is Lord of the Rings, Star Wars, Spider-Man, Superman, or even Batman. But the directors of those particular films made them realistic and deep enough for the audience to relate to. I'm not saying Transformers needs to be this deep Return of the King film and so forth.

But in my opinion, Bay appears to be concentrating on the human perspective rather than concentrating on the robots themselves. The robots themselves are characters and have human qualities as well, which is what is displayed in Transformers cartoons and the animated movie in the 80's. Yes, the animated movie had a lot of cheesy moments, and cheesy 80's music. It was the 80's then so it was expected.

The overall concept was dark, epic, and emotional. Transformers is a very good story and the alien robots need to be focused on as well.

The problem is no one wants to think anymore. They want to check their brain at the door which is fine for dumb ADD action film. But with a concept like Transformers there's nothing wrong with adding Prime talking to Spike about Cybertron or space, there's nothing wrong with adding emotion of dying Transformers, and there's nothing wrong with making Autobots and Decepticons actual characters that the audience can relate to.


Wow... a poster who can talk intellligently... Who would of thunk it! :D Yeah I tottally get what your saying, one of my favorite things about TF the Movie is the character development. The idea of Prime shoes being filled by someone barely an adult, when he finally lights their darkest hour it's awesome. However there's probably a more practical reason for not having the TFs take center stage and that's money along with the fact it's all CGI. The more human interaction the better... For two reason the first being it costs a ton of money for the TFs to be up there so that's a plus for hte studios. And secondly because it's all CGI to being with, if it was just TFs for two hours, there'd be not point of it being live action in the first place, the problem with the cartoon is, in the end it forgot all about the humans and we lost a really cool dimension to the TF universe which is how humans would react to huge robots waging a war on their planet.
 
You realize that you just describe the original TF series? TF the movie is awesome because it's NOT DEEP. You realize this right? Look I'm sorry that most movies don't fit in your little elitist snobbish world so you make **** up so that you can feel better than everyone else but it simply not the case. Also don't insinuate the movie audience as being stupid because they don't have teh same insecurities as you, and can enjoy a fun movie.

Sorry, but you have no right to accuse ANYONE of being snobbish and elistist, you self-obsessed hypocrite. And your little laughable psychology about making **** up so that I can feel better than everyone else...that looks more like projection once again from you. I've seen how you treat people that don't have the same "elite knowledge" that you do. You have your own summer threads to feed that over-sized ego of yours. Haven't you been banned once for basically being a jerk? Or twice?

What the **** are you smoking, THAT"S WHAT TF IS. Your logic is beyond baffling. It's a series that was MADE TO SELL TOYS!!! THE ENTIRE SERIES WAS CHEESY GOOD VS. EVIL FIGHT AFTER ANOTHER, and it was awesome cuz it was huge robots battling each other with cool designs... Did we just watch the same trailer, it looks to have some of the coolest action scenes EVER. Your posts are beyond stupid, if you think that TF is suppose to be deep or intelligent. You want deep watch an Ingmar Bergman film or something...

Hahaha, typical enabler. Just because the series was made to sell toys in your perception, doesn't mean it didn't have it underlying themes or quality stories. AND IT DOESN'T MEAN THE MOVIE HAS TO BE MADE THE SAME WAY! But guess what, genius? It appears that is completely the case. Sorry for wanting it to be intelligent. I know that type of movie would probably fly over your head and not appeal to your tastes.

My posts are stupid? Why? Because they contain opinion and views different from your own? Yet more of your pompus and better-than-you attitude. How old are you? 13? You certainly act it.

And yes, I saw the same trailer. Typical action movie with giant robots inserted and explosions and all that crap. Pretty mind-numbing, and if the movie is anything like that, you should be right at home.
 
The problem is no one wants to think anymore. They want to check their brain at the door which is fine for dumb ADD action film. But with a concept like Transformers there's nothing wrong with adding Prime talking to Spike about Cybertron or space, there's nothing wrong with adding emotion of dying Transformers, and there's nothing wrong with making Autobots and Decepticons actual characters that the audience can relate to.

Well, we haven't heard one line of dialogue from the Transformers yet, but we know people have been cast to voice them. Also in the trailer you see Spike running in front of what I assume to be the new Bumblebee trying to stop the military from killing them, so you have emotion. The trailer shows what everyone wants to see the explosions and big Transformers, but the movie is going to be around two hours, we've only seen what 2-3 minutes.
 
Sorry, but you have no right to accuse ANYONE of being snobbish and elistist, you self-obsessed hypocrite. And your little laughable psychology about making **** up so that I can feel better than everyone else...that looks more like projection once again from you. I've seen how you treat people that don't have the same "elite knowledge" that you do. You have your own summer threads to feed that over-sized ego of yours. Haven't you been banned once for basically being a jerk? Or twice?

I could point out how wrong you are but then again let me ask you question, how many people do you know on this site who've been unbanned? ;) Your basically a jerk, who goes around inciting how you opinion is always right, I on the other hand simply ream out those who are either being self-important (I.E. You), not listening to any coherent reason (I.E. You), or are simply being a dick (I.E. You). Tell me... If I'm such a snob, *******, etc... Tell me how come a mod on this forum has NEVER, let me repeat this to you, NEVER had a problem with me or sent me a warning. The only warning/baning/probates and **** was for **** I caused on the Community, answer me that smart guy? TEll me how many times have you been warned by mods for trolling? :confused: (P.S. I know it's been more than once :) )


Hahaha, typical enabler. Just because the series was made to sell toys in your perception, doesn't mean it didn't have it underlying themes or quality stories. AND IT DOESN'T MEAN THE MOVIE HAS TO BE MADE THE SAME WAY! But guess what, genius? It appears that is completely the case. Sorry for wanting it to be intelligent. I know that type of movie would probably fly over your head and not appeal to your tastes.

I'm 90% that I've seen and read more stories than you have probably with more depth... Also... I find it funny that you critize the movie for not being made the same way the cartoon is made, then you say that the movie shouldn't be made. How about you pick a side? As for intelligent, what constitutes for intelligent? DONNIE DARKO THAT **** WAS MAD DEEP! Movies do not have to be deep to be good, they have to be entertaining, entertaining means a variety of things, not one narrowly prescribed view that somehow gives you an edge over everyone else. Sometimes cheesy plots and formulated scripts work, a lot of times there utter failure that come out like mediocre trash. Sometimes being overly deep and trying to be too intelligent comes out like pretencious trash. My point is and my ultimate problem with you, is that you've basically written everything out unless it conforms to your narrow view instead of giving it a chance...

My posts are stupid? Why? Because they contain opinion and views different from your own? Yet more of your pompus and better-than-you attitude. How old are you? 13? You certainly act it.

And yes, I saw the same trailer. Typical action movie with giant robots inserted and explosions and all that crap. Pretty mind-numbing, and if the movie is anything like that, you should be right at home.

No there stupid because most of hte time, your just grandstanding how awesome and intelligent you think you are, and how everything a waste of time, and how movie audiences are dumb... Yeah that sums you up, a Class A troll :) Now... Whether you want disagree or not is your perogative, but I've manage to pretty much blow apart your argument so I assume you'll go on to insult me since that'll be your only recourse...

Notice... I've only mentioned I'm excited for this, I haven't declared it will be awesome... And you had the gall to accuse me of not being a fan since I'm excited for this film... Um if that doesn't smack of self-importance, I don't know what does
 
I'm not going to waste my time filling up a paragraph or 8 on how wrong you are. I don't think you said a single intelligent or correct thing, and then to add to it, you call me names like "dick" and "jerk", which is truly the sign of a mature mind. Nah, no point in it.

But I have never been banned nor warned for trolling, to answer your question. There is no way you can know that either.

And as far as blowing apart my argument? LOL, thanks for the laugh. If you have to tell yourself that, go right ahead. Oh, and didn't you actually have the gall to mention grandstanding? Again, LOL!

Goodbye, and I'll leave you with a nice present.
 
I'm not going to waste my time filling up a paragraph or 8 on how wrong you are. I don't think you said a single intelligent or correct thing, and then to add to it, you call me names like "dick" and "jerk", which is truly the sign of a mature mind. Nah, no point in it.

But I have never been banned nor warned for trolling, to answer your question. There is no way you can know that either.

And as far as blowing apart my argument? LOL, thanks for the laugh. If you have to tell yourself that, go right ahead. Oh, and didn't you actually have the gall to mention grandstanding? Again, LOL!

Goodbye, and I'll leave you with a nice present.

Dude your posts were deleted from my thread... That's how I know :)
 
Point blank, I am of the camp that it's not that deep. Yes, I grew up with them same as the rest of us, but all the mythos was created after the fact, because geeky fans like us decided to expand upon it via comic books, novels, and other cartoon spinoffs.
The characters and themes/concepts resonated. That's why it has millions of life-long fans today.

Of course Micheal (Pearl Harbor missed the point) Bay ignored all that to make a soulless Go Bots movie disguised as Transformers.

The whole concept was created to sell toys, that's it.
How do you know for sure? How do you know the toys weren't to sell the subversive ideas within the story?

Why did they include themes of environmentalism, imperialism, deception used for war, death of a beloved leader, the absurdity of nationalism (Decepticons/Autobots) etc. The creators of Transformers lived through the 60's. They saw the endless Vietnam War (imperialism). They saw important leaders who were our greatest hope die (MLK, JFK, RFK). They saw the race for natural resources and pollution destroying the planet. The creators where artist who grew up on the Twilight Zone and the Outer Limits. These shows had socio-political messages disguised in science-fiction. They were more than meets the eye. Transformers had the same socio-political messages disguised in science fiction aimed at the children of the baby boomers, generation X. Far more than Harry Potter or other "respectable" forms of children entertainment that deserve accurate adaptations.

On the G1 dvd extra feature a writer compares Optimus Prime to Abraham Lincoln. Now you may write that off as silly but think about it. Optimus Prime protected the "freedom of all sentient beings" during a civil war between his race. He ultimately died in that struggle. "Till all are one".

Orson Welles. You know the guy who caused widespread panic with a deceptively realistic War of Worlds radio broadcast and put the word "rosebud" in America's consciousness? He wasn't a cartoon voice actor but he voiced Unicron in Transformers. I doubt this was a coincidence. He saw something there that Micheal (Pearl Harbor missed the point) Bay wants to trivialize.

Transformers and the Twilight Zone seem like harmless entertainment but they were far more subversive than most people realize. The creators could've went the pokemon/power ranger route if they wanted to sell toys. They didn't have to have Megatron turn into a nazi-gun, or make the Transformer civil war a battle for energy resource, or make the Autobots the descents of a slave-worker class who become freedom fighters, or make the decepticons intergalactic imperialist obsessed with energy who attack oil rigs on a regular basis, or make the creators of the Transformers elitist, super-intelligent, five-faced, conspirators. They didn't take the pokemon/power ranger route to sell toys. Instead of exploiting children's imagination for a quick buck they gave kids "one to grow on". Giving them water instead of "Brawndo" (see the movie Idiocracy).

Then you have the "what qualifies as life" sci fi elements that have more in common with Blade Runner, Spielberg's "Artificial Intelligence", and Ghost in the Shell than it has in common with power rangers.

But keep thinking Harry Potter deserves to be translated accurately but Transformers deserves a dumbed down, half-assed adaptation. You're all a bunch of "muggles" to the Hollywood wizards anyway.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muggle
 
The characters and themes/concepts resonated. That's why it has millions of life-long fans today.

Okay... This is a valid enough opinion...

Of course Micheal (Pearl Harbor missed the point) Bay ignored all that to make a soulless Go Bots movie disguised as Transformers.

Perhaps we might wnat wait on that call till the movie is out


How do you know for sure? How do you know the toys weren't to sell the subversive ideas within the story?

Your stretching here buddy... I love TF: THe Movie but the reason they killed off so many characters was so they could sell more toys. TF has and always will be driven by toys.

Why did they include themes of environmentalism, imperialism, deception used for war, death of a beloved leader, the absurdity of nationalism (Decepticons/Autobots) etc. The creators of Transformers lived through the 60's. They saw the endless Vietnam War (imperialism). They saw important leaders who were our greatest hope die (MLK, JFK, RFK). Pollution and destroying the environment was the biggest emerging issue. The creators where artist who grew up on the Twilight Zone and the Outer Limits. These shows had socio-political messages disguised in science-fiction. They were more than meets the eye. Transformers had the same socio-political messages disguised in science fiction aimed at the children of the baby boomers, generation X. Far more than Harry Potter or other "respectable" forms of children entertainment that deserve accurate adaptations.

I want respect your opinion, however you realize your watching a cartoon show made for kids... A rather hokey cartoon show, I mean perhaps you can show me some clips or cite some episodes since... I have the whole TF Series on Tape... If you did that for me, perhaps I'd be able to believe you... So again it's out there, provide an episode of some sort, some clips... Something to back this up.

On the G1 dvd extra feature a writer compares Optimus Prime to Abraham Lincoln. Now you may write that off as silly but think about it. Optimus Prime protected the "freedom of all sentient beings" during a civil war between his race. He ultimately died in that struggle. "Till all are one".

It's rather basic though, what I mean by this is how is Bay wrong for this project? All Optimus has to do is fight evil Decepticons use a bad ass tone and toss out cheesy lines like that, and you have the same depth as the cartoon show, so what I mean is... I don't get how you guys can insult Bay for what is essentially a faithful adaption, or what appears to be... The only way it won't be faithful... Is if it didn't have evil vs. good robots, and it was just about humans fighting robots but it isn't. Then again I still have to see the movie but there hasn't been anything for me to believe what your saying.

Orson Welles. You know the guy who caused widespread panic with a deceptively realistic War of Worlds radio broadcast and put the word "rosebud" in America's consciousness? He wasn't a cartoon voice actor but he voiced Unicron in Transformers. I doubt this was a coincidence. He saw something there that Micheal (Pearl Harbor missed the point) Bay wants to trivialize.

I hate to break this to you buddy, but ORson Welles became pretty pathetic toward the end of his life. He had spent all his money on his failed projects so he took any job that'd pay him. Don't get me wrong he did an awesome job and I love Citizen Kane, Mr. Arkadin, and Touch of Evil... But the truth of the matter is your point here holds no weight since he was a broke bastard that'd probably be the narrator in a porno if it was paying well.

Transformers and the Twilight Zone seem like harmless entertainment but they were far more subversive than most people realize. The creators could've went the pokemon/power ranger route if they wanted to sell toys. They didn't have to have Megatron turn into a nazi-gun, or make the Transformer civil war a battle for energy resource, or make the Autobots the descents of a slave-worker class who become freedom fighters, or make the decepticons intergalactic imperialist obsessed with energy who attack oil rigs on a regular basis, or make the creators of the Transformers elitist, super-intelligent, five-faced, conspirators. They didn't take the pokemon/power ranger route to sell toys. Instead of exploiting children's imagination for a quick buck they gave kids "one to grow on". Giving them water instead of "Brawndo" (see the movie Idiocracy).

You realize that Transformers is pretty standard stuff? There's nothing ground breaking in it. Most of what you cite is just filler, for fights, every TF episode I saw the main entree was the fights. However maybe it's selective memory... point out an episode and I'll go watch it and maybe my opinion will change. Look all of this was in the background, it wasn' the focus, just like it will be in the movie. I don't get why your citing this as a negative, since there's been nothing that saying that this stuff isn't in the movie.

then you have the "what qualifies as life" sci fi elements that have more in common with Blade Runner, Spielberg's "Artificial Intelligence", and Ghost in the Shell than it has in common with power rangers.

But keep thinking Harry Potter deserves to be translated accurately but Transformers deserves a dumbed down, half-assed adaptation. You're all a bunch of "muggles" to the Hollywood wizards anyway.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muggle


Harry Potter is a simple story coming of age story set to a backdrop of magic. Just like Transformers is a simple good vs. evil story set against a sci-fi backdrop, what's important is the good vs. evil struggle the rest is rather unimportant.

Just look at the intro it cites exactly what I've been saying

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZhCtVq5iIa0

Transformers is about a battle against evil that is the focus wtih huge spectacular fights. Now I'm watching this episode on youtube, a typical TF episode not one thing you said is in it... of course I'm only 2 minutes in so maybe I'll eat my words...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e3bM4p0ikkI&mode=related&search=
 
damn that trailer looks so freakin sweet... il go see it for the action.. screw it, we know this isnt going to be a drama ridden film. more of a action packed rollercoaster crazy shiet goin down film
 
anyone know waht movie this will be playing with
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"