UF student tasered at John Kerry Speech

[Tempest19]

Too late, claimed it as my own. No, not really- no.

 

[Mr Sparkle]

LOL. No it's not. Have you even taken Aikido. I have. First of all, it's hard to subdue someone with Akido since almost all of the moves are designed to keep the attacker AT A DISTANCE. Two, getting your ass thrown face first onto the floor...well, there is "fun" or "harmless" about that.

you have taken aikido?
and you're saying the moves are to keep the attacker at a distance?
NO, you're confusing it with Judo.
sorry, moving on, you're wrong again.

No, you're wrong. I work out and train with police officers. You watch COPS apparently, according to your own admission. COPS is a television show therefore it's going to show people what it CAN show them not necessarily a correct overrview of things. There are no martial arts designed to 'not hurt'. The only reason sports like Wrestling and Boxing have minimized injury is because rules and regulations protect the individuals involved.

lol, again, you're adding stuff to my post, that I never said to defend your weak position, so far, the best you can come up with are parallels that have little or nothing to do with the situation.
simply put, five people CAN subdue an individual without using tazers.
regardless of how much you work out with them, and how irrelevant that happens to be.

Practicing Akido moves in a McDojo might have given you the false impression they are 'safe' or 'harmless' to the attacked. However if your sensei or coach is teaching MMA or Akido moves that "will cause little harm to the attacker" then he is a dumbass. When someone is actively trying to get away or hurt the person in question, the lack of control in said situation means that the person attempting to subdue must use some form of physical force.

LOL, now not only do you assume, but you assert that I practice in a Mc Dojo, I'm sure your seven years in the orient taught you many skills, but sadly debating a credible argument isn't one, aikido in fact, is based ON submission. as I stated before, the amount of damage sustained by the opponent is based upon his resistance, I'm sure that your nine years in ninja school didn't cover that, but it is in fact "how it is"

bottom line? again? five people CAN subdue a suspect such as this without the use of tazers.
again, you happen to be wrong.

So, you're wrong MrSparkle...and you fall into the same misconceptions about fighting that most people do.

so, no, you're wrong, and unlike you I don't have to make up some bull**** about what kind of Dojo you practice at, or something about your sensei, the mere fact that you said this:

"since almost all of the moves are designed to keep the attacker AT A DISTANCE"

completely discredits you.

so again, you're wrong.
sowy

 

[Mr Sparkle]

hey, if you haven't already, pick up the shout out louds' first album "howl howl gaff gaff". it's awesome and completely up your grimy alley.

I shall get this, if its the last thing I'll do tomorrow morning.
( it probably will be)

 

[Mr Sparkle]

Dude, you're nuts. I'm not talking about the speed of the take down, I'm talking about the physicality. And you just said a couple. Mr. Sparkle was talking about one cop.

how many cops in this altercation?t: LOL.

 

[Mr Sparkle]

What the hell do you know about hand to hand combat? How often have you tried to subdue someone that doesn't want to be? It's not as easy as it you seem to think it is. I watch cops alot, and I've never seen someone "simply" be subdued. Those cops probably aren't black belts, they've probably had one or two classes in self defense. And being campus police, they probably don't use their "training in hand to hand combat" much anyways. And that guy wasn't a small dude.

LOL, that doesn't want to be what? I just noticed how we went from certainty to what "probably" is the reason, the facade is starting to crack and methinks that much like shadowboxing and many friends I had in college you just like to argue a point even when you realize your wrong.

Yes, a kick is considered bodily harm, as in it HARMS THE BODY even if it only leaves a small bruise.

AHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!! "drop your legs or I'll shoot!!!" ahahahahahahahahaha!!!!

YES YOU DILLHOLE. If an armed robber is coming at you with a gun, the police can shoot them. What ****ing cop is going to sit there in front of an armed person just asking question. Your knowledge of police procedure is about a thorough as your knowledge of hand to hand combat.

LOL, you can't shoot armed robbery suspects on sight, sorry that's what I said.
look at it.

gee, guess they should just shoot armed robbery suspects on sight, you know "why go to all the trouble" of questioning them?

I don't know what the hell you were responding to though, good job on being an incoherent ranting loon though, stellar job on that.

Apparently you haven't read the numerous posted I have made on this subject.

no, I have, what I said was BECAUSE i have read your responses, not in spite of not reading them.

Ok, and how much experience in combat have you had? Playing Street Fighter doesn't count.

LOL, did you read my post? I mean, seriously I'm not going to match UFC credentials with you, because it's the internet, I could claim like shadowboxing that "your kung fu is good, but you need dsicipline"but that would make me sound like an insecure, balding chump.
( oops, I mean "argumentative" sorry shadow :heart

Lets see, you have no knowledge of hand to hand combat. You have no knowledge of police procedure. You have no knowledge of my arguement of why this kid deserved to be tased. You're batting a thousand here.

you realize that you just pretty much assumed everything in this post with no proof to back up your statement right? I hope you realize how wrong that makes you in the real world.

Nothing you have said is "true". At most, they are you opinions, and not very thought out opinions either. You just cling to lame exaggerations. I can see why you defend this kid though. You both have the same style of debate, ie: just talking out of your ass with no real sense of logic. You could be the next President Bush.

given your statement above this one. maybe YOU could be the same president Bush.
let's take your statement and Bushy-fy it a little.

Lets see, you have weapons of mass destruction. You have aided AL Quaeda. You have kissed Osama Bin Laden. You're batting a thousand here....Saddam.

um, yeah, that's real presidential of you.

 

[Mr Sparkle]

No one said subduing someone was easy and painless, except apparently Mr.Sparkle...who I disagree with. However tasing someone isn't easy and painless either

LOL, see, the only thing I said, was that a physical takedown was more appropriate in this situation and that it would have caused less harm to the suspect than tazing.

Like I told you, you rush for that "argumentative *****" merit badge so much, that you seldom stop and read.

I mean, 5 officers.

5

 

[TNC9852002]

This thread has inspired me.

<-------------------------------

Out of curiosity, has anyone bought one of those shirts?

-TNC

 

[Mike_D202]

Use the *edit" function Sparky Nuts