Whirlysplat
Superhero
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2006
- Messages
- 5,414
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 56
Mistress Gluon said:And Rorschach was easily an opposing view in that same breadth. Nighthawk felt the people should be in control, where Rorschach felt the people should know. So it could be easily said that killing Nighthawk was killing the idea of truth. I'll admit that in Watchmen, it was "actually killed" since it wasn't allowed to spread. But Nighthawk was killed only AFTER he was allowed to spread it.
Nighthawk and Hyperion had different views, you see Nighthawks as a truth fair enough. I see it as a view.
Mistress Gluon said:Both were killed for their beliefs. And both were considered truths. Except for Rorschach, because it was believed he SHOULD be killed to not spread the truth
Now you're getting it except one is a truth and the other an opposing view.
Mistress Gluon said:giving a mysterious "controlling the fate of mankind" deal to the others, basically putting them at the beginning of the SS's cycle of control.
Not really as they had unified mankind by presenting an external threat and not imposed a doctrine.
- Whirly