Universal Monsters

Status
Not open for further replies.
That Dracula movie bombed though, didn't it? I doubt they want to connect it to that.

Well it had a budget of about $70 million and made $56 million domestic, but it did make $217 million worldwide. So maybe that's enough.

I have no idea what they are doing, but apparently Untold was supposed to be the start of whatever this shared universe is.
 
Well it had a budget of about $70 million and made $56 million domestic, but it did make $217 million worldwide. So maybe that's enough.

I have no idea what they are doing, but apparently Untold was supposed to be the start of whatever this shared universe is.

That's O.K., I don't think THEY have any idea what they're doing either! :oldrazz:

Crap, at this point they may as well go back to the same game plan that they used back in the '40s: make a bunch of'em, see which ones make money, and then just hodgepodge them into something that's supposed to resemble a single continuity after the fact.
 
How Universal plans to bring its monster movies back to life http://bit.ly/1HUH6hL

Universal is the house that “Dracula,” “The Wolf Man” and “Frankenstein” built.
At a time when other studios are furiously raiding the vaults of comic books and graphic novels, trying to find the next Marvel and DC Comics, Universal is deviating from the superhero movie playbook — at the same time it mimics some of its strategies.
The studio has tapped Alex Kurtzman (“Transformers”) and Chris Morgan (“Furious 7”) to revive the monsters that were the studio’s stock in trade during the golden age of Hollywood. Together, they’re overseeing a team that’s busy mixing in elements of those classic films, such as the bolts in Frankenstein’s neck, with a modern setting tied to contemporary themes.
“This is not a heightened world,” Morgan says. “We’re exploring issues of family identity and questions of, ‘Where do I belong in the world?’ ”
The films are taking a page from Marvel in certain ways, however. Just as the comic book label launched its onscreen group of heroes in interconnected films before teaming them in one big superstream adventure with “The Avengers,” Universal is planning to create a shared universe for its creatures. “The characters will interact with each other across movies,” says Donna Langley, chair of Universal Pictures. “We’re incubating it at the moment, and we’re taking the time to get it right.”

The plan is for a new monster movie to come out every year. The first of these, based on the character of the Mummy, will begin shooting in early 2016, with other pictures centered on Dracula, Van Helsing, Bride of Frankenstein and the Wolfman following in short order. To prepare, Kurtzman and Morgan obsessively watched Universal monster films made with the likes of Boris Karloff and Bela Lugosi, and to broaden the sense of genre, augmented that with a diet of Hammer Horror pictures and other creepy works.
“We’re creating a mythology, so we’re looking at this canon and thinking, ‘What are the rules?’ ” Kurtzman says. “What can we break and what are the ones that are untouchable?”
Storyboard artists and designers are creating the look and feel of the various productions, and each of the 10 writers working on the project has been assigned a monster to oversee.
“The idea is that we have a deep bench of brains to consult with about how their monster fits into our world as we go forward,” Kurtzman explains.
To head its team, Universal brass has found two self-confessed horror geeks who credit pictures like “Dracula” and “Abbott and Costello Meet Frankenstein” with inspiring their love of film.
“I was raised on monster movies,” Morgan says. “I used to make my own fake puke, so I wouldn’t have to go to school and could stay home and watch things like ‘Cat People’ on TV. I can still tell you what I used — orange juice, Saltines, Pepsi and milk.”
Both men think that after more than a decade of seeing Captain America, Batman and other heroes routinely save civilization, moviegoers are ready for a change of pace.
“Heroes tend to be perfect, but most people in an audience aren’t ever going to know what it’s like to be the smartest, strongest or fastest person alive,” Morgan says. “But there’s a darkness inside everybody. And everyone wants to be able to turn a curse into empowerment. The monsters have been in the shadows, and now it’s time to bring them out into the light.”
 
I feel like we are hearing so much about this plan, but I mean, what's the end game here? Where are the results?
 
I feel like we are hearing so much about this plan, but I mean, what's the end game here? Where are the results?


The Mummy reboot starts' filming next year for a 2017 release and they've just hired two writers to write the screenplay for Van Helsing.

They also have Dracula Untold if need be to attach it in to this universe.
 
The Mummy reboot starts' filming next year for a 2017 release and they've just hired two writers to write the screenplay for Van Helsing.

They also have Dracula Untold if need be to attach it in to this universe.

I'm just not sure I see this franchise plan working out.

Also, why a Van Helsing remake? The first movie wasn't a huge hit. It was supposed to spawn a franchise but it didn't. It underperformed. Why is it going to work this time?
 
I'm just not sure I see this franchise plan working out.

It's only been a year since they came together. You're acting like this group of people have been working on this for years. :funny:

Van Helsing remake of the character not the crappy movie. Van Helsing has been around for decades longer.
 
Are moviegoers going to tell the difference? The only reference for a Van Helsing movie is the 2004 film.

One of the writers worked on 47 Ronin.
 
It wouldn't be that hard to differentiate them. Anymore that it was hard to different Hugh Jackman's Van Helsing from, say Peter Cushing's or Sir Anthony Hopkin's (ie, not at all).
 
I highly doubt they're going to tie this to that Dracula Untold movie. Even though it did okay internationally, I don't think it was very well-received and it seems to be all but forgotten already. And there have been so many Dracula movies over the years, it's not like anyone will think "oh, it's a reboot" if they release a new one with a new actor.
 
I highly doubt they're going to tie this to that Dracula Untold movie. Even though it did okay internationally, I don't think it was very well-received and it seems to be all but forgotten already. And there have been so many Dracula movies over the years, it's not like anyone will think "oh, it's a reboot" if they release a new one with a new actor.


Yeah it sounds like they are ditching that turd and starting fresh. That's for the best.

So it seems like they are using Dracula, The Mummy, The Wolf-Man, Frankenstein's Monster, and The Bride. I hope they include The Creature and The Invisible Man too. They are excellent characters with unique qualities and motivations.

I'm really not sure how to feel about this whole thing. I love the idea of bringing the Monsters back and creating a shared universe for them. I mean come on Frankenstein, Dracula, and The Wolf-Man belong together! However, I'm just not confident in the direction they seem to be going. These shouldn't be PG-13 action/adventure movies they should be Rated R horror films. These monsters should be the villains (sympathetic or not) of their films not the heroes. Making Dracula a tragic hero like in Untold is antithetical to the whole character. He is a villain and a delightfully sinister/deviant one at that. Hell in the original novel he's basically a sexual predator! These monsters shouldn't be turned into the "Dark Avengers". I fear that is where they are headed. They need to actually look at the original classics and literature (skip the awful sequels and/or remakes) for inspiration of how to tell a quality horror story and stop trying to make a Fast and Furious movie with monsters.
 
I wonder how they're going to go with Van Helsing, i myself enjoyed the 2004 film, even though it wasn't very good. Going with an action adventure where the universal monsters are villains has some potential, i wish Universal would just get the rights to Castlevania and use that as the "event film", since turning Van Helsing into an action hero didn't go so well.
 
i hope they dont start fresh with dracula. i like Luke Evans as an action hero Vlad.
 
Yeah it sounds like they are ditching that turd and starting fresh. That's for the best.

So it seems like they are using Dracula, The Mummy, The Wolf-Man, Frankenstein's Monster, and The Bride. I hope they include The Creature and The Invisible Man too. They are excellent characters with unique qualities and motivations.

I'm really not sure how to feel about this whole thing. I love the idea of bringing the Monsters back and creating a shared universe for them. I mean come on Frankenstein, Dracula, and The Wolf-Man belong together! However, I'm just not confident in the direction they seem to be going. These shouldn't be PG-13 action/adventure movies they should be Rated R horror films. These monsters should be the villains (sympathetic or not) of their films not the heroes. Making Dracula a tragic hero like in Untold is antithetical to the whole character. He is a villain and a delightfully sinister/deviant one at that. Hell in the original novel he's basically a sexual predator! These monsters shouldn't be turned into the "Dark Avengers". I fear that is where they are headed. They need to actually look at the original classics and literature (skip the awful sequels and/or remakes) for inspiration of how to tell a quality horror story and stop trying to make a Fast and Furious movie with monsters.

Oh crap, now I just want to see a Dracula movie called 2 Fangs 2 Furious.
 

seal-of-approval2.gif
 
Damn! They ain't gonna mock this universe if they land Cruise.
 
Too good to be true but imagine if this universe has both Cruise and Jolie. And maybe some more from their league. :wow:
 
Wasn't Cruise attached to star in the Van Helsing reboot awhile back? Oh well, guess that leaves them room to get Christoph Waltz for the role, which they really should.
 
But yeah this is a good sign nonetheless since Cruise's film choices as of late have been impeccable.
 
THR saying a window opened up because Liman will be directing Gambit next. http://thr.cm/y2S0g8


Cruise was most recently seen in Mission: Impossible - Rogue Nation. He was planning on reuniting with Doug Liman, for whom he recently wrapped 1980s drug movie Mena, for Luna Park but when Liman took on Fox's Gambit, it left a space in his schedule for Mummy.

The movie will begin shooting mid- February. Cruise will then head back to the Mission: Impossible franchise for the sixth installment, which will shoot in later 2016.
 
Cruise for the Mummy would be good for this reboot, they need someone to draw in audiences, and as said before, Cruise's past films have been pretty good.
 
Hopefully, Cruise signing on means that it won't suck.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,294
Messages
22,081,672
Members
45,881
Latest member
lucindaschatz
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"