Warrior

I agree that Hardy is of the same mold of actor as DDL, but he has a looong way to go before he should be considered in the same league, imo. Give him 10-20 years, and he could be. I have noticed his taste in projects is starting to trend toward the mainstream fare, which DDL's generally hasn't, so we may be seeing a change in direction for Hardy's career that takes him away from the DDL types of roles. Only time will tell.
 
Hardy portraying Al Capone could place him back on that road, but honesty, Tom has range. He could very well be on DDL's level in ten years.
 
Anybody CAN become the new best thing. But the chances of Tom Hardy becoming the new Daniel Day-Lewis is as big as Mila Kunis becoming the new Meryl Streep.
 
Anybody CAN become the new best thing. But the chances of Tom Hardy becoming the new Daniel Day-Lewis is as big as Mila Kunis becoming the new Meryl Streep.
Come on now, that's not even close to an equal comparison. Hardy's already displayed FAR more range than Kunis has, or let's be real here, probably ever will.
 
Yep, it's a horrific comparison. Tom Hardy is leagues ahead of Mila Kunis.
 
I've not even managed to see this movie yet and it's not released for another ten days on blu and dvd in UK. Being a hardy boy fan tho I know I will enjoy it.
 
Come on now, that's not even close to an equal comparison. Hardy's already displayed FAR more range than Kunis has, or let's be real here, probably ever will.
No I think its a very fair comparison. They are both new it actors at the moment, and they have shown equal amount of acting talent. Actually I prefer Kunis in Black Swan to anything Hardy has done.

And range isnt everything. Some of the greatest actors ever had little range. Having said that, I dont think he has shown that much range.
 
No I think its a very fair comparison. They are both new it actors at the moment, and they have shown equal amount of acting talent. Actually I prefer Kunis in Black Swan to anything Hardy has done.

And range isnt everything. Some of the greatest actors ever had little range. Having said that, I dont think he has shown that much range.
I could not disagree with you more. Megan Fox could have done just as good a job in Black Swan as Kunis did. It was a nothing role in which all she had to do was look sexy.

Hardy was at least been good in every film that I have seen of his. He is the real deal and not some bland "it" boy of the moment.
 
Hardy is a terrific actor. I don't know how anyone could say otherwise after seeing Bronson, The Take and Warrior. Even in his small roles in RocknRolla where he's a gay gangster, and Inception he is good.
 
not trying to say that Kunis did some complex acting in Black Swan. but Megan Fox couldnt play this role.
 
not trying to say that Kunis did some complex acting in Black Swan. but Megan Fox couldnt play this role.
Swan is an overrated peice of mediocre trash IMHO. I didn't see one special performance in. The Oscars disagreed with me but I don't care.
 
Obviously you guys like him more than I do. The point is its ridiculous when people talk about Hardy like he is some acting god. How could you possibly think my comparison is worse than the one comparing him to Daniel Day-Lewis. There are so many other young actors and actresses who are equally or better actors than Tom Hardy.
 
Laderlappen you need to put everything in context. Hardy is the second time in a Nolan movie . and this is superherohype. things changed.
 
I never compared him to DDL. I just said that he was a damn good character actor and I think that he will get even better with age.

Very few are treating Hardy like he is some sort of acting god and only like one person compared him to DDL. If we are going to get into the Batman thing, that "acting god" type of hyperbole is only reserved for Heath Ledger.
 
I never compared him to DDL. I just said that he was a damn good character actor and I think that he will get even better with age.

Very few are treating Hardy like he is some sort of acting god and only like one person compared him to DDL. If we are going to get into the Batman thing, that "acting god" type of hyperbole is only reserved for Heath Ledger.

While we are on the subject, I found it funny how some Chris Nolan Bat fans cried, whined and trolled when it was first announced that Heath Ledger was playing the Joker. There was like a TON and I mean a TON of Brokeback Mountain jokes on these forums. Then Heath dies, and the buzz about his performance catches fire. Everyone sees the movie and then worships Heath Ledger like he was some kinda God lol. Crazy how quick fanboys turn. Now Tom Hardy is the new Heath Ledger of sorts.
 
While we are on the subject, I found it funny how some Chris Nolan Bat fans cried, whined and trolled when it was first announced that Heath Ledger was playing the Joker. There was like a TON and I mean a TON of Brokeback Mountain jokes on these forums. Then Heath dies, and the buzz about his performance catches fire. Everyone sees the movie and then worships Heath Ledger like he was some kinda God lol. Crazy how quick fanboys turn. Now Tom Hardy is the new Heath Ledger of sorts.
I wasn't on board with Ledger's casting either but he did a great job. I did like him before that but I wasn't some huge fan and I'm not a huge fan now. It's sad for his family that he died so young and I was shocked but I will never put him on a pedestal that I never had him on in the first place. I do find that to be a deeply dishonest thing that runs through the Batman forums.

He was great as The Joker and he was a talented actor but he isn't and never will be in my top ten favorite actors and he doesn't get into that list just because he killed himself...accidentally. I honestly found the reaction to Ledger's death by people who didn't even know him to be over the top and deeply annoying on every level. Sometimes I hate my fellow nerds.
 
I wasn't on board with Ledger's casting either but he did a great job. I did like him before that but I wasn't some huge fan and I'm not a huge fan now. It's sad for his family that he died so young and I was shocked but I will never put him on a pedestal that I never had him on in the first place. I do find that to be a deeply dishonest thing that runs through the Batman forums.

He was great as The Joker and he was a talented actor but he isn't and never will be in my top ten favorite actors and he doesn't get into that list just because he killed himself...accidentally.

I would have said I was in the same camp. I never saw Brokeback mountain or anything else Ledger was noted for, in fact I'd only ever seen him in his earlier less serious films (10 Things I Hate About You, A Knight's Tale) so I wasn't really a big fan or considered him an amazing actor. I'd heard good things, but that was it. When he was cast, I was quite indifferent to it.

Then I saw TDK, and was blown away. Every acclaimed actor has a breakout role of sorts - something that transcends the previous works they were in and marks them out as something special - and in my opinion, for Ledger that was TDK. The way he changed his voice, his mannerisms, his posture, his fidgeting, his look, everything - it blew me away. To me he was totally unrecognisable from the young guy in 10 Things...............

And not only that, but he managed to create a new and very sinister take on a character which had already been played (somewhat iconically, I may add) by Jack Nicholson, a performance which many people felt was pretty pitch perfect and couldn't be bettered. I've read many articles about the work and effort Ledger put into the creation of his take on the Joker, and his dedication was impressive. I particularly loved the scenes where he maintains the hysterical laughing side of the Joker perfectly, but a second later switches to this dangerous, growling personality - such as the handheld cam video where he has tied up one of the civilians posing as Batman. That to me exuded much more menace and danger than Nicholson's did.

It's just a pity his body of work was cut short by his untimely death. Many of the actors considered Hollywood greats (Pacino, De Niro, etc) have been phoning in their roles for years now, and I'd dearly loved to have seen what someone like Ledger - with a bit of vigour and youthful enthusiasm - would have done with his future roles.
 
Last edited:
While we are on the subject, I found it funny how some Chris Nolan Bat fans cried, whined and trolled when it was first announced that Heath Ledger was playing the Joker. There was like a TON and I mean a TON of Brokeback Mountain jokes on these forums. Then Heath dies, and the buzz about his performance catches fire. Everyone sees the movie and then worships Heath Ledger like he was some kinda God lol. Crazy how quick fanboys turn. Now Tom Hardy is the new Heath Ledger of sorts.
The difference is of course that Hardy is so popular by Batman fans before the movie is out. We will have to see if he is still as popular when the movie is released.
 
It's Anne that's getting the "Heath reaction". The initial positive reaction of Hardy's casting outweighs the negative. It's the opposite for Anne in terms of initial reaction.
 
The National - About Today (Warrior Version)
[YT]r26VsCGCgb0[/YT]

Hell of a song to end on.
 
The National - About Today (Warrior Version)
[YT]r26VsCGCgb0[/YT]

Hell of a song to end on.

got choked up when that song played, and when Hardy was leaning against the cage crying. :csad:
 
It's Anne that's getting the "Heath reaction". The initial positive reaction of Hardy's casting outweighs the negative. It's the opposite for Anne in terms of initial reaction.

Yep. Anne Hathaway seems to be getting the 'blown away' reviews this time around. Sources keep stating that Anne shocked everybody on-set. I hope it's true. She's been criticized since being offered the role on other sites (from 'no boobs' to 'she's ugly' to 'she's a mediocre actress' debates).

As for Heath Ledger, he was remarkable and stellar as The Joker. His performance certainly deserved The Oscar. I'll admit though, prior to witnessing his portrayal as The Joker, I was bewildered by the casting choice. I thought Nolan had jumped the shark. Now, keep in mind, I'd only seen Heath in teen flicks like 'A Knight's Tale' at school. However, after the glorious teaser was released, I took my ass to the nearest Blockbuster and I rented 'Brokeback Mountain', 'I'm Not There' and 'Candy'.

Tom Hardy is not Daniel-Day Lewis. That much is assured. Yet, his acting chops cannot be denied. His performances in Bronson, Tinker Tailer Soldier Spy, Warrior, The Take, and Stuart: A Life Backwards indicate that Hardy undeniably has that potential. This is a guy who's basically a 'pansy' or 'big baby' (according to himself). Nevertheless, Tom manages to transform himself into a dark and/or vicious character effortlessly. That is something Daniel-Day Lewis is known for. They're both method actors, but the only difference between them is that one has chosen the more momentous roles.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"