Superman Returns Was Superman Returns the perfect movie?

[Papa Burgundy]

thumbs up if you think mac and me is perfect!

look at this classic scene!

http://youtube.com/watch?v=K5le9sYdYkM

amazing!!!

 

[dr collossus]

^I'm all out of pillows!

But seriously, if anyone wants me to discuss my problems with the movie, either look through my past posts or create a thread were i can do so!

You can discuss them here.

 

[sithgoblin]

No movie is flawless and perfect.

I think some are. I can't think of anything I'd change about Raiders or Terminator 2, for example.

 

[dude stannis]

I think some are. I can't think of anything I'd change about Raiders or Terminator 2, for example.

I personally prefer Terminator 1.

 

[Angeloz]

Including her hair?

Hi dear.

Angeloz

 

[dude stannis]

Hey sweetie, well, the movie itself took place in 1984 so it's forgivable. Rather than say Aliens which is set in 2179 and Ripley has an afro.

 

[Angeloz]

Yeah but that doesn't make it slighty imperfect?

Angeloz

 

[dude stannis]

Why? My mullet looks pretty much the same.

 

[Angeloz]

And you admit that publicly?

Angeloz

 

[dude stannis]

Well, it's not actually true. I had a mullet like 15 years ago. I'll bet you had Sarah Conner hair in '84!

As for the perfect movie. There's no such thing every movie has it's faults. Except for Batman '89. That movie is perfect. Anyone who thinks otherwise should be burned at the stake.

 

[Papa Burgundy]

i think spiderman 2 is about perfect but i dont know about the punch me i bleed line...spiderman 3 was about perfect for exactly one hour then all the sudden he started bustin moves and saying he was gonna put dirt on peoples eyes.

million dollar baby was perfect. so was toy story 1 & 2. hell almost every pixar movie is perfect. i think american history x is about perfect aside from one continuity mistake but do those count? and imo harry potter and the poa was perfect idk about you guys though but that was a great movie and one of the best sequels ever. malcolm x was a perfect movie also. and there was on scene in alexander that i thought was perfect, if youve seen it you should know what im talking about. but i think im getting off topic lol

 

[AVEITWITHJAMON]

You can discuss them here.

Well to go through briefly, the RTK scene should have stayed (unless we see it in a sequel), the Doctor pulling the undiluted Kryptonite shard should have been cut, Superman should have had more screentime, with Lex and Lois having slightly less and Bosworth wasnt the best choice, but at the same time, sometimes her character was written poorly.

I personally prefer Terminator 1.

Me too, its the better movie IMO.

 

[C. Lee]

I think some are. I can't think of anything I'd change about Raiders or Terminator 2, for example.

I love Raiders....but there are minor things that keep it from being perfect...Indy packs a revolver to go to Marion's, comes in with an automatic.....Indy and Sallah through rope into the Well of Souls and the rope is laying across the lip of the hole, as Indy climbs down it you can see it extending up past the lip into the air.....Indy and Marion break out of the tomb with snakes, and an Arab can be seen sitting right there doing nothing (there was a scene cut where he faints at them coming out).....great movie, I love it....but not perfect.

There are imperfections in T2 also (the date of the apocalypse, John's age....)....again, great movie, I love it....but not perfect.

 

[I SEE SPIDEY]

No movie can ever be really perfect...except Robocop and Terminator 2.

 

[SuperDaniel]

I love Raiders....but there are minor things that keep it from being perfect...Indy packs a revolver to go to Marion's, comes in with an automatic.....Indy and Sallah through rope into the Well of Souls and the rope is laying across the lip of the hole, as Indy climbs down it you can see it extending up past the lip into the air.....Indy and Marion break out of the tomb with snakes, and an Arab can be seen sitting right there doing nothing (there was a scene cut where he faints at them coming out).....great movie, I love it....but not perfect.

There are imperfections in T2 also (the date of the apocalypse, John's age....)....again, great movie, I love it....but not perfect.

Thats just nitpicking. Or contuinity flaws. That doesnt count as mistake for me.

 

[dr collossus]

Thats just nitpicking. Or contuinity flaws. That doesnt count as mistake for me.

And that's just making excuses. Surely by definition a perfect movie would have to be absolutely 100% flawless without even the slightest defect.

 

[B]

The title of this thread made me laugh

 

[dr collossus]

Very true even Batman Begins has it's flaws

Yeah - Katie Holmes

 

[El Payaso]

A flaw can't be a mistake!

http://dictionary.cambridge.org/define.asp?key=29542&dict=CALD

wtf

 

[DanSupKP37]

even Batman Begins has it's flaws

http://youtube.com/watch?v=A1LifiFYzNE

A great many of them at that.

 

[C. Lee]

A flaw can't be a mistake!

http://dictionary.cambridge.org/define.asp?key=29542&dict=CALD

wtf

Where'd you read that...here's what I saw -
Definition
flaw Show phonetics
noun [C]
a fault, mistake or weakness, especially one that happens while something is being planned or made, or which causes something not to be perfect:

 

[Papa Burgundy]

the only problem i had with this movie was that routh didnt have enough dialouge but he was still great. i just wanna see more of his skills.

 

[mego joe]

By no stretch of the imagination is SR the 'perfect' film, or even close. It's is so bad it's not even funny.

 

[Angeloz]

Worse than "Superman IV"?

Angeloz

 

[mego joe]

Worse than "Superman IV"?

Angeloz

Undoubtedly. The concept for SIV was very good and 1/2 the film was good.

SR just mistepped almost each moment.